Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



dragonchic ([info]bananainpyjamas) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2009-03-01 22:56:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:it is very sad that this post has no tag

Pound for pound this is one of the most befuddling wanks I've seen
A question about a common symbol leads to three pages of cross-Atlantic warfare.

There's really nothing more to say.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]blue_penguin
2009-03-02 05:18 am UTC (link)
Wow, it's amazing how much wank-mileage they've gotten out of such a simple question.

Personally, I like "octothorpe." It's the most pretentious-sounding option.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]erototoxin
2009-03-02 06:03 am UTC (link)
"Octothorp" doesn't have an "e"! What is WRONG with you?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2009-03-02 06:19 am UTC (link)
It's "Octothorp#," you nits!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]blue_penguin
2009-03-02 06:46 am UTC (link)
It does SO have an "e"! God, what are you, stupid?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tunxeh
2009-03-02 06:39 am UTC (link)
Yeah, I'm sad it took until most of the way through page 2 of the comments for that one to show up.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]blue_penguin
2009-03-02 06:45 am UTC (link)
Seriously. Where is the love for the poor, neglected octothorpe?

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map