Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



white_tean ([info]white_tean) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
Oh good, new and tasty snowflake wank.

Someone really has this much of a problem, after writing several books with the idea that his work may not be perfect on the first go?

I like point number one on his new rant musing:
"The ms. went to production with a cover sheet from my line editor that specifically requested a “light” copy edit with queries. My editor is the one who gave me the erasers to fix this mess."

Clearly, the hugbox is not as impenetrable as he'd have liked it to be.

Also, how are people allowed to say how many flaws they want to be found in their work?

Of course, I'm assuming these edits were with basis, because I can't see any true professionals getting their knickers in such a twist if the red marks were the ranting of a nutter, because you don't get angry if someone says the sky is orange because it's irrefutable not.

Snowflake wank; It dissolves into tastiness on the warmth of my tongue.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map