|
| |||
|
|
Oh good, new and tasty snowflake wank. Someone really has this much of a problem, after writing several books with the idea that his work may not be perfect on the first go? I like point number one on his new "The ms. went to production with a cover sheet from my line editor that specifically requested a “light” copy edit with queries. My editor is the one who gave me the erasers to fix this mess." Clearly, the hugbox is not as impenetrable as he'd have liked it to be. Also, how are people allowed to say how many flaws they want to be found in their work? Of course, I'm assuming these edits were with basis, because I can't see any true professionals getting their knickers in such a twist if the red marks were the ranting of a nutter, because you don't get angry if someone says the sky is orange because it's irrefutable not. Snowflake wank; It dissolves into tastiness on the warmth of my tongue. Post a comment in response: |
||||
|
Privacy Policy -
COPPA Legal Disclaimer - Site Map |