|
| |||
|
|
Three things! 1. Mauscript? Why is he writing about dictators, again? 2. Why did his editor have to give him erasers? Didn't he have his own? And seriously, wouldn't it make more sense to maybe just reprint the damned manuscript? With the sensible edits incorporated? 3. Something I haven't seen anyone suggest is that maybe this author is the kind of special little snowflake who sees one or two red marks and FLIPS THE FUCK OUT, and then screams on the internets about how his manuscript was BLEEDING from the MEEEEN copyeditor's EEEVIL pen. Given his BAAAWWWWW rant online and his condescending follow-up, I know that's what I'm thinking. Post a comment in response: |
||||
|
Privacy Policy -
COPPA Legal Disclaimer - Site Map |