Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Darkeyes ([info]darkeyes) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
I found you a quote from LaNora. It's in reference to the 'Feminist Smut' article though, haven't seen anything else about the whole debacle.



"..If you call your book(s) smut, they are likely to be perceived as such. If that’s your goal, congratulations.

If, however, you wish to reach a wider audience and try to brand what you’ve labeled smut as Romance in order to do so, you will offend and anger many–writers and readers.

Smut is a word used to offend, insult or at least garner attention. Go right ahead and use it to describe the books published by RR if that’s your choice.

But if you use it, publish it, then call it Romance, you’re in for a hell of a backlash. As is evidenced by this thread."


Comment #76 if you don't want to wade through the wank.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map