Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Like a book club, except with more sex! ([info]notjo) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2009-09-20 18:29:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I doubt your committment to edginess
Once, long ago, an author released a book unto the world. And this book was considered to be awful by many many many critics, to the point where much parody was made of the author, the book, and the fans. This mockery ramped up when a movie was made, and even more people were introduced to the author. And, of course, all truly "hip" readers turned up their noses, refusing to call that... that... tripe... literature.

I am, of course, talking about Dan Brown.

Over at
Literary Tattoos, Loosma writes:

I love Dan Brown, particularly his Robert Langdon series and I have huge respect for him and his research for his new book The Lost Symbol. I'm reading that now and I'm having a hard time putting it down but there are some great quotes in here. I keep wanting to highlight them and come back because sometimes I come across a sentence that hits me hard just because it relates to me in a way. As do everyone when they tattoo a quote or lyric or whatever on their body

Anyway, so really if any readers of those books have gotten a tattoo relating to the plot or through some quote in there? Especially puzzle lovers? lol



Marvel at the pretentiousness, when we're assured that people are basically sheep and only the amazing folks at Literary Tattoos are capable of sorting that a dancing dog isn't that big a deal.

Be assured that a book is no longer any good once it's popular.

Discuss how Brown does research wrong! Have other people insist that Dan Brown actually does lots of research and is very accurate! (I skipped that, because I am an historian who lives with a theologian, so LOL NO)

OMG! Everyone is so meeen! - not from the OP, although she agrees. More MEEEN!

The OP ultimate tacks on her flounce, in bold:
Ok ok! I got the message! Dan Brown sucks, I have horrible literary sense, the oprah book club thing is probably I something should check into, etc etc etc. Anyway, everyone is entitled to their opinion, regardless of how polite or bitchy it was presented but to each their own.



I just want you all to know that I hated Dan Brown before it was "in" to hate Dan Brown. I bet it's now ~edgy~ to be scholar who loves Dan Brown for the plot, and I totes want to be ~edgy~. Dan Brown Forever! Go Robert Langdon!


(Post a new comment)


[info]keri
2009-09-21 04:38 am UTC (link)
The Have other people insist that Dan Brown actually does lots of research and is very accurate! link/poster had be thinking it only needed a smiley at the end to be pure sarcasm, until I got to the final bit of the comment.


still, lololololol.

(Reply to this)


[info]beejium
2009-09-21 04:50 am UTC (link)
I don't understand the Dan Brown hate. I thoroughly enjoyed both his last books and am looking forward to buying stealing the new one from my stepmom when she's done because I'm poor. I'm no history major or anything, but I don't see what's so horribly wrong about him not doing his research. Thousands upon thousands of other works have been terribly inaccurate and haven't been subject to as much venom as Dan Brown has, so what's the big deal?

Honestly, if I wanted to read a super srs book about the Knights Templar or whatever, I'd go read a textbook. I'm in it for the campy LHC subplot and the dudes getting killed in creative ways.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hallidae
2009-09-21 04:56 am UTC (link)
Part of the reason is because he sold it as conspiracy truth wrapped in a story when the first book came out. It wasn't until historians, art historians, astronomers, geographers, etc. started trashing him loudly up and down that he finally admitted that he'd blown inaccuracy for the sake of fiction.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 05:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-21 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]inarticulate, 2009-09-21 05:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 02:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakthemouse, 2009-09-21 10:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-09-21 01:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 03:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2009-09-21 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-09-22 12:53 pm UTC
My favorite Little Johnny joke: - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 07:58 pm UTC
Re: My favorite Little Johnny joke: - [info]notjo, 2009-09-21 08:23 pm UTC
Not a Little Johnny, but... - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 08:59 pm UTC
Re: My favorite Little Johnny joke: - [info]dejla, 2009-09-24 12:39 am UTC
Re: My favorite Little Johnny joke: - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 08:35 pm UTC
Re: My favorite Little Johnny joke: - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 08:42 pm UTC
Re: My favorite Little Johnny joke: - [info]beccastareyes, 2009-09-22 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2009-09-21 09:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2009-09-21 02:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2009-09-21 05:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2009-09-21 05:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-21 05:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2009-09-26 07:21 pm UTC

[info]brennalarose
2009-09-21 04:57 am UTC (link)
Word. Okay, so he's no literary god and his research is iffy, at best. The Da Vinci Code was a fun bit of mindless adventure novel for me and, if nothing else, I had fun turning my copy of Angels and Demons around and around and giggling at the cool writing effects (I was on Vicodin and very very loopy).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-09-21 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 05:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-09-29 06:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-09-21 05:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]persona, 2009-09-21 05:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 04:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-09-21 10:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 02:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-21 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-21 05:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-09-22 05:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghostmaster, 2009-09-21 07:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-09-21 01:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2009-09-22 02:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2009-09-22 03:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-09-22 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 01:11 pm UTC

[info]t_boy
2009-09-21 05:49 am UTC (link)
Read Da Vinci Code, spent an enjoyable day going, "Ooh! I remember Alan Moore talking about this!" over and over again.

Read Angels and Demons, got so angry I swore I'd never read his books ever again.

...

I don't even know what the difference was between those two books.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-21 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]t_boy, 2009-09-21 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-21 08:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 01:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luxshine, 2009-09-21 03:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 05:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lil_miss_stfu, 2009-09-22 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luxshine, 2009-09-22 06:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-22 09:29 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2009-09-21 06:38 am UTC (link)
Oh, you know, just the shitty writing style, the formulaic plots, the shit writing, the writing, the cliches, the writing, the crap writing, and the fact that there is no such thing as a goddamn fucking symbologist.

I liked the movie of Da Vinci Code, though. Really funny shit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2009-09-21 08:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]major_dallas, 2009-09-21 10:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 01:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]catslash, 2009-09-21 05:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]empy, 2009-09-24 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-25 06:50 pm UTC

[info]darth_wanker
2009-09-21 07:33 am UTC (link)
I'm with you. I equate it a little bit to Twilight in that I know what I am reading is not literary genius, but it is entertaining enough to keep me going. Only the Dan Brown stuff is maybe one or two ladder pegs above the SMeyer stuff in that there is no Cesarean section being performed by sparkly vampire teeth. Perhaps that will be in the next book, "Robert Langdon and the Adventures of Vampire Judas."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-21 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deliciouschaos, 2009-09-21 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2009-09-22 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sadisticferret, 2009-09-22 06:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-22 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-09-21 09:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2009-09-21 09:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 01:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 02:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]girlmorphine, 2009-09-21 07:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-21 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]girlmorphine, 2009-09-21 09:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lilgoala, 2009-09-21 11:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 08:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eisoj5, 2009-09-21 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-22 12:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]waitwut, 2009-09-22 04:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-09-21 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-22 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]miss_eponine, 2009-09-22 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sqbr, 2009-09-22 03:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]melannen, 2009-09-22 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-09-22 10:41 am UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-23 01:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-09-23 01:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-23 01:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-09-23 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-24 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sqbr, 2009-09-22 03:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jar, 2009-09-24 11:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 04:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jar, 2009-09-25 12:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-25 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2009-09-26 07:16 pm UTC

[info]ruffwriter
2009-09-21 05:19 am UTC (link)
I don't think I'm cool enough to hate Dan Brown for his research or lack thereof - I was too busy wondering how the dead guy from The DaVinci Code managed to run all about the Louvre leaving clues as he bled to death.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2009-09-21 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2009-09-21 07:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sukeban, 2009-09-21 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notarose, 2009-09-21 08:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2009-09-21 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2009-09-21 09:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-21 09:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-09-21 11:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-09-21 12:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2009-09-21 12:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-09-21 12:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 04:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-09-24 10:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_tean, 2009-09-21 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julian_black, 2009-09-22 03:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-09-22 07:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-09-22 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 02:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_tean, 2009-09-21 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 01:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-09-21 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2009-09-22 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-09-22 02:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2009-09-22 02:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-09-22 03:13 am UTC

[info]keleri
2009-09-21 05:36 am UTC (link)
Dan Brown? Meh. I'm still boggling over the friend of mine who got not one but TWO tattoos based on what she read in the Da Vinci Code.

(Reply to this)


[info]queencallipygos
2009-09-21 05:38 am UTC (link)
The two best observations I've heard about Dan Brown are:

a) One thing he does very, very well is write a good plot that makes you curious enough to want to know what happens next. Unfortunately, the language he uses to write ABOUT that plot sucks dingo kidneys. (Personally, that would be enough to put me off, but I am much more persnickety about the quality of the writing than most other people -- to the point that it's almost a fault. So I definitely know that "but that's just me".)

b) An anecdote -- when the Da Vinci Code movie was coming out, some friends tried to round up a bunch of us to all see it together. One of our friends -- a hard-core Jesuit and highly literary type -- insisted that he read the book before we all saw the movie. So he borrowed it from one of our other friends.

Except that after he read it, he returned the book and said, "I don't want to see a movie made out of this crap." And thus he sat our movie night out in protest.

(In Dan Brown's defense -- that friend is even more particular about writing than me.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2009-09-21 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]queencallipygos, 2009-09-21 12:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]annathepiper, 2009-09-21 06:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 12:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 12:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-09-21 01:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zyna_kat, 2009-09-21 02:09 pm UTC

[info]munchkinott
2009-09-21 06:07 am UTC (link)
Anyway, so really if any readers of those books have gotten a tattoo relating to the plot or through some quote in there? Especially puzzle lovers? lol

Isn't there a chance that a DaVinci Code tattoo could be misread by a film geek as a Hudson Hawk tattoo? Which is worse: being slaughtered by lit fanatics for your love of Dan Brown or living with the knowledge that someone, somewhere will think you loved that movie where Bruce Willis was a cat burglar SO MUCH?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cassildra, 2009-09-21 06:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beachlass, 2009-09-21 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 09:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 09:35 pm UTC

[info]tehrin
2009-09-21 08:37 am UTC (link)
Obligatory Dan Brown sucks. I didn't know there was a literary tattoo community. I long for the day Cassie is mentioned, either there or on bad_tattoos.

(Reply to this)


[info]ghyste
2009-09-21 09:09 am UTC (link)
I was on a tour of the British Library a few years back when one of the other members of the group asked the guide whether Dan Brown had used the library when researching The DaVinci Code. Their reply, in wonderfully deadpan tones, was: “Having read the book, I’d say no.”

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-09-21 12:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2009-09-21 01:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-21 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2009-09-22 01:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2009-09-26 08:01 pm UTC

[info]stella_polaris
2009-09-21 12:50 pm UTC (link)
I hated Dan Brown too before it was cool to hate Dan Brown. Jesus. Even now I feel a rant rising up in my throat like bile.



Although I make an exception: Angels & Demons is a halfway decent movie. Tom Hanks saves a lot.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]zyna_kat, 2009-09-21 02:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 02:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zyna_kat, 2009-09-21 02:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 02:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pariforma, 2009-09-21 02:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 02:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]persona, 2009-09-21 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2009-09-21 08:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-09-22 05:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-09-29 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-09-29 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2009-09-21 08:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 08:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]queencallipygos, 2009-09-22 08:54 pm UTC

[info]snarkhunter
2009-09-21 01:55 pm UTC (link)
Aside from the writing and his absurd manner of creating suspense (..."She'll never forget what she saw that night...IN THE BASEMENT!"), my biggest issue with Brown is that I am much, much smarter than his supposed Harvard symbologist main character.

SRSLY, Langdon, it doesn't take more than a second to figure out MIRROR SCRIPT.

(Have not read A&D. A friend of mine did...kept me updated as she read it. Sounds howlingly awful/funny.)

But my confession? I actually like Twilight, though I am not blind to its faults.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]zyna_kat, 2009-09-21 02:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 02:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-21 02:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-21 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2009-09-22 08:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meagenimage, 2009-09-22 02:20 pm UTC

[info]snarkhunter
2009-09-21 02:38 pm UTC (link)
I gotta say that I do feel kind of bad for the OP. Generally speaking, I'll side with Dan Brown readers over literary snobs.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 05:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-09-21 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-21 05:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2009-09-24 05:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-09-23 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]inarticulate, 2009-09-21 05:35 pm UTC

[info]mcity
2009-09-21 06:56 pm UTC (link)
>Oprah or her little club

"Little"?!

>OMG! Some people will have watched the LOTR films and not read the books first

What if you read the books, but skipped all the not-Frodo-and-Sam bits from the second one onward, like I did?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2009-09-21 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sistercoyote, 2009-09-21 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mercutia, 2009-09-22 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2009-09-24 04:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-09-21 10:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nibor, 2009-09-22 06:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-09-22 11:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-09-22 12:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigbigtruck, 2009-09-22 03:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-09-23 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]inalasahl, 2009-09-21 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mcity, 2009-09-21 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2009-09-22 09:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghyste, 2009-09-22 01:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]taterbird, 2009-09-22 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ghyste, 2009-09-22 07:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2009-09-23 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2009-09-23 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2009-09-26 08:03 pm UTC

[info]ara
2009-09-21 11:40 pm UTC (link)
Wow, that community is douchetastic.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2009-09-22 02:05 am UTC

[info]blue_penguin
2009-09-22 02:09 am UTC (link)
I kind of love that there are people complaining about literary snobbery and showing off one's highbrow tastes in reading material in a comm for literary tattoos. I mean, surely that kind of comes with the territory?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2009-09-22 02:09 am UTC

[info]dragonfangirl
2009-09-22 01:18 pm UTC (link)
Thanks to the internet, I've developed an amazing new reflex: as soon as I see someone use the word "sheep" in relation to other people, the respect and credibility centers of my brain automatically shut down.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bigbigtruck, 2009-09-22 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-09-23 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2009-09-22 03:26 pm UTC

[info]moongazingfae
2009-09-22 01:52 pm UTC (link)
I have a really odd way to explain why Dan Brown causes me distress.

If you're hungry, you want to eat something. You have two choices: some chewing gum/a pack of crisps, or a tasty, balanced meal. You choose the meal, you're satisfied at the end, it's all good. You choose the chewing gum or crisps, you munch away rapidly and before you know it, the artificial taste is gone and you're even emptier than before, left with either an empty crisp packet or a wad of rubbery crap in your mouth and a nasty aftertaste either way. Oh, and you're probably feeling somewhat upset that your choice failed to stop the hunger.

Dan Brown = the shit option.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady_jafaria, 2009-09-23 05:07 am UTC

[info]castalianspring
2009-09-22 07:42 pm UTC (link)
Just the title of his damn book annoys me. People, stop referring to Leonardo as "Da Vinci"! Leonardo is his name, da Vinci is where he's from. Stop it now.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2009-09-22 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-23 11:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meagenimage, 2009-09-23 01:32 pm UTC
reilly or brown?
[info]dana
2009-09-23 03:53 am UTC (link)
I haven't read Dan Brown. I don't ever plan to, but I did start reading Matthew Reilly (adventure where the pyramids and stonehedge are part of this great machine designed to save the world from some antimatter planet in teh solar system, and the protagonist is a super-soldier ).

So for anyone who read both, is Reilly better or worst then Brown?

(Reply to this)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2009-09-23 05:50 pm UTC (link)
So what does it say that I have so little awareness of this guy, my first thought was "what, the School Stories that were the ur-Potter?" (no, that's TOM Brown.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-24 08:35 pm UTC

[info]big_bad_wolf
2009-09-24 04:58 pm UTC (link)
I kinda of like that comm, they were pleasant to a girl who had Watership Down tattoos and when I went there looking - quite blatantly - for validation on my self-important tattoos of my own writing I got it in spades.

The fact that they recognise Dan Brown is not really writing just makes me like them more.

ZOMG I AM A DOUCHEBAG. :D

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map