Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Like a book club, except with more sex! ([info]notjo) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2009-09-20 18:29:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I doubt your committment to edginess
Once, long ago, an author released a book unto the world. And this book was considered to be awful by many many many critics, to the point where much parody was made of the author, the book, and the fans. This mockery ramped up when a movie was made, and even more people were introduced to the author. And, of course, all truly "hip" readers turned up their noses, refusing to call that... that... tripe... literature.

I am, of course, talking about Dan Brown.

Over at
Literary Tattoos, Loosma writes:

I love Dan Brown, particularly his Robert Langdon series and I have huge respect for him and his research for his new book The Lost Symbol. I'm reading that now and I'm having a hard time putting it down but there are some great quotes in here. I keep wanting to highlight them and come back because sometimes I come across a sentence that hits me hard just because it relates to me in a way. As do everyone when they tattoo a quote or lyric or whatever on their body

Anyway, so really if any readers of those books have gotten a tattoo relating to the plot or through some quote in there? Especially puzzle lovers? lol



Marvel at the pretentiousness, when we're assured that people are basically sheep and only the amazing folks at Literary Tattoos are capable of sorting that a dancing dog isn't that big a deal.

Be assured that a book is no longer any good once it's popular.

Discuss how Brown does research wrong! Have other people insist that Dan Brown actually does lots of research and is very accurate! (I skipped that, because I am an historian who lives with a theologian, so LOL NO)

OMG! Everyone is so meeen! - not from the OP, although she agrees. More MEEEN!

The OP ultimate tacks on her flounce, in bold:
Ok ok! I got the message! Dan Brown sucks, I have horrible literary sense, the oprah book club thing is probably I something should check into, etc etc etc. Anyway, everyone is entitled to their opinion, regardless of how polite or bitchy it was presented but to each their own.



I just want you all to know that I hated Dan Brown before it was "in" to hate Dan Brown. I bet it's now ~edgy~ to be scholar who loves Dan Brown for the plot, and I totes want to be ~edgy~. Dan Brown Forever! Go Robert Langdon!


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]hallidae
2009-09-21 05:12 am UTC (link)
I admit, I started reading the The Da Vinci Code because of the "TRUTH" hype, and was (and am) a big art history geek, so that clouds my judgment. I went RAWR at a lot of the things about Leonardo and the works cited in the novel that were fucked up and pretty much declared Brown a hack from then on.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]brennalarose
2009-09-21 05:26 am UTC (link)
For me, it was the Mary Magdalene stuff that ground my gears. He would have been okay and maybe even plausible, after a fashion, if he had kept Da Vinci's name out of it (and Disney, and the Louvre, and too many others to remember at present).

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]inarticulate
2009-09-21 05:49 am UTC (link)
The TRUTH hype and his lack of "yeah, okay, I made shit up," is kind of where I get stuck, too. I love it when authors make shit up*! It's the lack of acknowledgment that he did.

On the other hand, as much as I hate to admit it, it was great publicity.



* Depending, of course, on whether the shit they make up is awesome or full of fail. But you know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lady_ganesh
2009-09-21 02:35 pm UTC (link)
I had a friend who was like WOW THIS STUFF IS AMAZING. And then I read it and was like, 'okay, half these theories I already knew, and the other half are...no.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]squeakthemouse
2009-09-21 10:26 pm UTC (link)
A while back, I tried to argue with a friend that the Da Vinci Code was not based on a true story. I eventually gave up.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map