Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



gusty ([info]gusty) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2009-09-25 12:45:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
When banning someone from a community, it's a good idea to make sure you've actually banned them.
[info]abandonedplaces is a community for taking photographs of... well. Abandoned places. [info]rhodamine is a frequent poster on said community, and somewhat infamous for not always posting things that are necessarily abandoned.

It all started a few days ago when [info]cymbal_rush took it upon themselves to express a very strong opinion of [info]rhodamine by making a new post to the community: "Dear [info]rhodamine,

This community is dedicated to "abandoned places", not "random pictures I took while walking around on railway tracks in the boroughs". You have this habit of posting solitary pictures of things that clearly aren't of abandoned places, and always with a link to a particular external web site that merely re-displays the whole photo. You're clearly not here on Livejournal to do anything other than drive traffic to a web site you co-own (I mean, that's all you use Wikipedia for, too, right?), and I'm positive that I'm not the only one here that is getting tired of your spamming. So please, knock it off.

For a sense of what we're collectively interested in around here, have a look at the recent amazing posts by [info]shktgun, [info]villy_barankin, [info]dedushka_nomto, [info]seventreehouses, and many others."


There's both agreement and displeasure that [info]cymbal_rush chose to use this public avenue to express their opinion, but the accused does not make an appearance. A day afterwards the mod of the community, [info]jj_maccrimmon, makes a post announcing [info]rhodamine has been banned and locks comments.

However, the REAL fun starts shortly after when [info]poindexter makes a post to the community simply saying "It's been fun!" with the header 'Bye!'.



Needless to say, this goes over like gangbusters. There are macros and snarking aplenty!

[info]liquidwhite: "What, do you mean that you're actually offended by an entire community embracing lynch mob mentality to cull a member?"
[info]rhodamine: "the funniest part is that, amidst all his lynch-mob mentality, the mod forgot to actually ban me. imagine that!"

OOPS.

[info]carriepika and [info]quantam_soul have a disagreement that boils down to 'Well you're a furry so your opinion doesn't count!'. Bolding mine:

[info]quantam_soul: "I'm sorry, but I cannot take anything seriously from a furry. I've done my research on them for psychology. And ew. But, this does explain why you wanted to be in on the drama. Go get in your costume and suck your thumb. You'll feel better. This community is not normally dramatic. We just had a drama whore come in and it got the others stirred up. The more drama whores that leave, the better off we'll be again."

Who knew abandoned buildings could be so wanky?

ETA: And now [info]rhodamine's comments on the post have been deleted.


(Post a new comment)


[info]quietladybirman
2009-09-25 07:28 pm UTC (link)
Aww, dammit, beaten to the punch.

Oh well, I got a flouncing kitten icon out of it, so I guess it's not all bad.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]feenix
2009-09-25 08:22 pm UTC (link)
Man, I'd ask to borrow that, but that'd be trolling the wank, wouldn't it.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2009-09-25 11:47 pm UTC (link)
Asking for icons is fine, I think. At least in my opinion.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2009-09-27 07:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-09-27 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2009-09-27 07:39 pm UTC

[info]aaron_agonistes
2009-09-25 07:49 pm UTC (link)
[info]ihatepeoplealot: Couldn't you be more diplomatic about it?

[info]cymbal_rush: Sure. More importantly, do you agree or disagree with what I'm saying here?



Man, this wank just keeps on giving.

(Reply to this)


[info]doire
2009-09-25 07:59 pm UTC (link)
[info]rhodamine posts all over [info]deadmachinery too.

I just adblock citynoise.org.

(Reply to this)


[info]onyxnoir
2009-09-25 08:05 pm UTC (link)
[info]rhodamine has been warned before. I got into it with him back in March about posting photos of questionable abandonments. He deleted those comments but I still have the caps.

http://pics.livejournal.com/onyx_noir/gallery/000050ps?page=1

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]persona
2009-09-25 08:48 pm UTC (link)
What a jerk.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]onyxnoir, 2009-09-25 08:51 pm UTC

[info]radiotrash
2009-09-25 11:11 pm UTC (link)
Lol I like how he came back weeks later to leave a comment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mercorir, 2009-10-17 05:12 am UTC

[info]lady_ganesh
2009-09-26 12:57 am UTC (link)
I don't see why they couldn't have just quietly banned him and made a general post about 'remember, this is a community about sharing photos, not a place to pimp your personal website.' I mean, everyone would have known what it was about from what you said.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-09-26 05:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-26 05:14 pm UTC

[info]carbucketty
2009-09-26 01:34 am UTC (link)
I'm just commenting to say seeing 'sutrobath' in the search bar intrigued me enough to google in myself. The More You Know!(tm)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]becktionary, 2009-09-26 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2009-09-26 12:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onyxnoir, 2009-09-29 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onyxnoir, 2009-09-29 11:37 pm UTC

[info]onyxnoir
2009-09-25 09:49 pm UTC (link)
LOL ETA. This does not surprise me at all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]darksumomo
2009-09-26 01:23 am UTC (link)
What a deal--two bannings for the price of one!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sisterelwood
2009-09-26 12:03 am UTC (link)
WATCH OUT GUYS- [info]quantam_soul is an internet psychologist. She might hurt us with her online degree.

Moron.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lady_ganesh
2009-09-26 12:59 am UTC (link)
I have never been on the side of furries more in my life, man. When you've got me squealing 'LEAVE THE FURRIES ALONE' you have officially crossed the line.

Note: I have no actual problems with furries. I just think that they are perhaps not as much of a persecuted minority as some of them claim to be.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-09-26 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-26 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-09-26 03:23 am UTC

[info]janegraddell
2009-09-26 01:04 am UTC (link)
Yes, she was very convincing in the way that she couldn't cite a journal name or article from her supposed paper that she allegedly slaved over.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-09-26 01:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]janegraddell, 2009-09-26 02:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-26 01:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gusty, 2009-09-26 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-26 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2009-09-26 02:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-26 04:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2009-09-26 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2009-09-26 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2009-09-26 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2009-09-27 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-09-27 01:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2009-09-27 05:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2009-09-27 06:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2009-09-29 07:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2009-09-29 08:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2009-09-27 01:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2009-09-27 02:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenscanary, 2009-09-26 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sisterelwood, 2009-09-28 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenscanary, 2009-09-28 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ara, 2009-10-02 03:22 am UTC

[info]dragonfangirl
2009-09-26 04:41 am UTC (link)
I love people who try to use psychoanalysis as a method of aggression.

Mostly because they usually fail at it so hard.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-26 05:19 pm UTC

[info]gmth
2009-09-26 12:34 am UTC (link)
Oh god, don't click on the "Offended" link going to ED. I should have known better, I should have known better...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]menatarms
2009-09-26 12:46 am UTC (link)
Ha, this. I can handle rude manips and pictures of explicit sex acts. Graphic pictures of people's brains spilling onto the ground? *flees*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-09-26 03:55 am UTC

[info]littleshebear
2009-09-26 02:13 am UTC (link)
I wish I'd read this comment before I clicked. There is not enough brain bleach in the world. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-09-26 04:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littleshebear, 2009-09-27 12:39 am UTC

[info]firebad
2009-09-26 02:25 am UTC (link)
I know. I'm usually pretty thick-skinned and strong-stomached, but the animal abuse stuff tipped me over the edge. Seriously, people, DO NOT CLICK.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2009-09-26 03:34 am UTC

[info]spawn_of_kong
2009-09-26 05:26 am UTC (link)
Thankfully, TV Tropes tipped me off that the ED link in question was prime schmuck bait (It's mentioned in the "Truth in Television" folder).

TV Tropes: not only the ultimate time-waster, but the ultimate lifesaver too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lied_ohne_worte
2009-09-26 09:24 am UTC (link)
I did that once. You have my sympathies.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]robinterrae
2009-09-26 12:50 am UTC (link)
Oh, so that's WHAT Carrie was talking about. I wondered.

(Reply to this)


[info]lizrocks
2009-09-26 11:03 pm UTC (link)
Whyyyyyy did I click on the Offended? link. Seriously? Am I new to teh internets? I know better than that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]_goblin_
2009-09-27 12:33 am UTC (link)
Don't feel too bad. I'm pretty sure I've clicked that link before, but I did it again anyway because I couldn't remember exactly why I felt so certain it was a bad idea to be clicking that link I was clicking.

Yeah. I R DUM. Hopefully this time the lesson sticks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2009-09-27 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2009-09-27 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadira, 2009-09-27 10:08 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map