Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



gusty ([info]gusty) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2009-09-25 12:45:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
When banning someone from a community, it's a good idea to make sure you've actually banned them.
[info]abandonedplaces is a community for taking photographs of... well. Abandoned places. [info]rhodamine is a frequent poster on said community, and somewhat infamous for not always posting things that are necessarily abandoned.

It all started a few days ago when [info]cymbal_rush took it upon themselves to express a very strong opinion of [info]rhodamine by making a new post to the community: "Dear [info]rhodamine,

This community is dedicated to "abandoned places", not "random pictures I took while walking around on railway tracks in the boroughs". You have this habit of posting solitary pictures of things that clearly aren't of abandoned places, and always with a link to a particular external web site that merely re-displays the whole photo. You're clearly not here on Livejournal to do anything other than drive traffic to a web site you co-own (I mean, that's all you use Wikipedia for, too, right?), and I'm positive that I'm not the only one here that is getting tired of your spamming. So please, knock it off.

For a sense of what we're collectively interested in around here, have a look at the recent amazing posts by [info]shktgun, [info]villy_barankin, [info]dedushka_nomto, [info]seventreehouses, and many others."


There's both agreement and displeasure that [info]cymbal_rush chose to use this public avenue to express their opinion, but the accused does not make an appearance. A day afterwards the mod of the community, [info]jj_maccrimmon, makes a post announcing [info]rhodamine has been banned and locks comments.

However, the REAL fun starts shortly after when [info]poindexter makes a post to the community simply saying "It's been fun!" with the header 'Bye!'.



Needless to say, this goes over like gangbusters. There are macros and snarking aplenty!

[info]liquidwhite: "What, do you mean that you're actually offended by an entire community embracing lynch mob mentality to cull a member?"
[info]rhodamine: "the funniest part is that, amidst all his lynch-mob mentality, the mod forgot to actually ban me. imagine that!"

OOPS.

[info]carriepika and [info]quantam_soul have a disagreement that boils down to 'Well you're a furry so your opinion doesn't count!'. Bolding mine:

[info]quantam_soul: "I'm sorry, but I cannot take anything seriously from a furry. I've done my research on them for psychology. And ew. But, this does explain why you wanted to be in on the drama. Go get in your costume and suck your thumb. You'll feel better. This community is not normally dramatic. We just had a drama whore come in and it got the others stirred up. The more drama whores that leave, the better off we'll be again."

Who knew abandoned buildings could be so wanky?

ETA: And now [info]rhodamine's comments on the post have been deleted.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]_goblin_
2009-09-27 12:33 am UTC (link)
Don't feel too bad. I'm pretty sure I've clicked that link before, but I did it again anyway because I couldn't remember exactly why I felt so certain it was a bad idea to be clicking that link I was clicking.

Yeah. I R DUM. Hopefully this time the lesson sticks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dragonfangirl
2009-09-27 04:50 am UTC (link)
I never feel like I have anything to contribute to these threads because I never do click.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]librarianmouse
2009-09-27 03:48 pm UTC (link)
Me neither. If I have to wonder about whether or not a link is okay, it is my policy not to click until someone else comments about it. So thanks, guys, you've answered my questions and I don't have to click now!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kadira
2009-09-27 10:08 pm UTC (link)
That makes three of us. Apart from the fact that my eyes and my brain hate me now very strongly, the site also crashed my entire computer.

I will learn it one day. I'm certain about that. Hopefully.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map