|
|
Hexnut (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} tunxeh) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank, |
Wikipedia has no mention of "go!"
Unsurprisingly, there's now a Wikipedia article on the old language, a Wikipedia article on the new language, and a debate on whether to delete the article on the older language because it's not famous enough. Complete with such non-wanky contributions as "Again, this discussion is quickly becoming a "neener-neener" playground game.", "Are you frickin' kidding me?", "I guess you haven't read any of the previous discussion since your comment is completely backward", and "I protest against being accused as socket puppet."
Unsurprisingly, there's now a Wikipedia article on the old language, a Wikipedia article on the new language, and a debate on whether to delete the article on the older language because it's not famous enough. Complete with such non-wanky contributions as "Again, this discussion is quickly becoming a "neener-neener" playground game.", "Are you frickin' kidding me?", "I guess you haven't read any of the previous discussion since your comment is completely backward", and "I protest against being accused as socket puppet."
Post a comment in response:
