Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



platedlizard ([info]platedlizard) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2010-07-07 18:41:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
AP vs. WOOt!; or platedlizard owes $100 to various blogs
Recently the CEO of WOOt! sent out what has to be the funniest 'We were purchased by Amazon' letter ever. Bloggers the world over quote from it extensively, and it was eventually picked up by the Associated Press. No big deal, right?

Well, there's a little problem. You see, the AP has started asking bloggers to pay them for taking quotes from their articles. This, needless to say, is not exactly popular in the bloggosphere. So of course WOOt! decided to poke a little fun at them.

The AP, we can’t thank you enough for looking our way. You see, when we showed off our good news on Wednesday afternoon, we expected we’d get a little bit of attention. But when we found your little newsy thing you do, we couldn’t help but notice something important. And that something is this: you printed our web content in your article! The web content that came from our blog! Why, isn’t that the very thing you’ve previously told nu-media bloggers they’re not supposed to do?

So, The AP, here we are. Just to be fair about this, we’ve used your very own pricing scheme to calculate how much you owe us. By looking through the link above, and comparing your post with our original letter, we’ve figured you owe us roughly $17.50 for the content you borrowed from our blog post, which, by the way, we worked very very hard to create. But, hey. We’re all friends here. And invoicing is such a hassle in today’s paperless society, are we right? How about this: instead of cutting us a check for the web content you liberated from our site, all you’ll need to do is show us your email receipt from today’s two pack of Sennheiser MX400 In-Ear Headphones, and we’ll call it even.


Now that's all bit of good fun, right? Anyone can see that it's a joke. Except maybe the AP.

This morning, Paul Colford, the Director of Media Relations for the AP sent emails to both me and Woot CEO Matt Rutledge. Here’s what we got:

MG Siegler:

Surely you’ll also want your readers to know that The Associated Press INTERVIEWED Mr. Rutledge, as this version of the “newsy little thing” you cite makes clear: http://bit.ly/cl8JlX

Meanwhile, AP staffers across the Gulf region and in Washington continue to provide comprehensive coverage of the oil spill.

You’ll find highlights of that coverage here: http://www.ap.org/oil_spill/

Cheers,

Paul Colford


That's right folks, he pulled the oil spill card. When asked for clarification Colford responded:

Root of this non-”story” ($17.50 for quotes) is 2 yrs old, as AP noted again in 2009: http://bit.ly/9ehJGZ

Thanks.


ORLY?

On final note, I am really not kidding about owing $100 for all the quotes according to the AP. See for yourself.

Edit: I apologize to the moderators for the attempted double post. My computer hit a pothole on the information superhighway.


(Post a new comment)


[info]sepiamagpie
2010-07-08 03:57 am UTC (link)
Edit: I apologize to the moderators for the attempted double post. My computer hit a pothole on the information superhighway.

is fine! Is fine

(Reply to this)


[info]keri
2010-07-08 04:01 am UTC (link)
You know, I didn't realize it'd been 2 years since the whole AP-copyright thing, and I also had no idea that they'd changed their minds a year later (if that's what happened?).

Also, AP? That copyright box thing that Woot! and TechCrunch linked to sure doesn't make it look like you're not aiming the quote-pricing-thing at bloggers.


I do love Woot! a tiny bit more now because of this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]adevyish
2010-07-08 06:42 am UTC (link)
I still want that cockroach evolution t-shirt *sniff*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]caoilainn
2010-07-08 04:56 am UTC (link)
I LOL'd.

Also, this quote - "However, given that the AP has previously suggested that writers pay for the right to quote as few as five words, $17.50 for Rutledge's 17 words, seems like a deal. Though at $6.99 plus $5.00 for shipping, the earbuds are a much better deal."

from the second link tickled me. Get the earbuds, dude.

(Reply to this)


[info]radiotrash
2010-07-08 05:14 am UTC (link)
Since I technically “interviewed” Colford for this post, I’m going to copy an AP story below.

I laughed so hard, oh man.

(Reply to this)


[info]darksumomo
2010-07-08 06:00 am UTC (link)
This is why I never quote an AP story in an unlocked blog post (such as my Science Saturday posts on Daily Kos) unless I have no other source for the story. Even then, I might just exclude the story from the post if I can find a story from, say, Reuters that is about something related, if not exactly the same story.

(Reply to this)


tetradecimal
2010-07-08 01:07 pm UTC (link)
Madam, I object to your wank report. The Associated Press is clearly an institution of SERIOUS BUSINESS.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]platedlizard
2010-07-08 10:21 pm UTC (link)
Oh. Oh dear.

I supose I need to be punished, like the bad, bad girl I am. Punish me Nightwing!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


tetradecimal
2010-07-08 11:35 pm UTC (link)
This conversation has taken an awkward turn. I NEED AN ADULT

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]singe
2010-07-08 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Pulling the oil spill card makes as much sense as claiming involvement in the Time War. Just...what?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lady_ganesh
2010-07-08 05:54 pm UTC (link)
The AP still does not understand this newfangled Internets thing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]singe
2010-07-08 11:55 pm UTC (link)
We're taking the moral high road...into Wacky-land!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]paladin
2010-07-09 07:25 pm UTC (link)
Bah! Does Woot! know how it feels to see your quotes go flying into the jaws of the Nightmare Child? To see your precious prose be mangled and warped nigh unto death by the twisted minds of bloggers, only to be resurrected and made to go through the process again by others quoting them? If so they would agree that these foul creatures have to be stopped, no matter the cost.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]singe
2010-07-11 06:10 pm UTC (link)
Snerk!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]giles6688
2010-07-08 03:57 pm UTC (link)
Woot, you're even more awesome than you were before. If only I wasn't broke, I would've bought every one of your Shakespeare shirts D= *Will be content with his other woot shirts, including his Delorean Vs Tardis one*

(Reply to this)


[info]snarkhunter
2010-07-08 04:25 pm UTC (link)
They want payment for *quotes*? Attributed quotes?

Um...fair use?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]darksumomo
2010-07-08 05:59 pm UTC (link)
The Associated Press apparently does not believe in Fair Use.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]annabelle_lee
2010-07-08 11:16 pm UTC (link)
Nor do they believe in pesky things called "spelling" and "grammar".

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]plazmah
2010-07-08 07:53 pm UTC (link)
You know, this would make footnotes much more complicated.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]plazmah
2010-07-08 07:54 pm UTC (link)
*boggles*

*LOLs at The AP*

(Reply to this)


[info]oxfordcomma
2010-07-08 09:25 pm UTC (link)
Surely we can come up with some great version of what AP really stands for. Other than Asshat Parade, obviously.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2010-07-08 11:26 pm UTC (link)
Archaic Predecessors?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bienegold
2010-07-08 11:34 pm UTC (link)
Antiquated Pedants?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]singe
2010-07-08 11:57 pm UTC (link)
Adder Pumpkins? Nevermind...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tez
2010-07-09 01:56 am UTC (link)
Admittedly Pernicious?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cafe_ennui
2010-07-09 08:20 am UTC (link)
Almost Plausible

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kaesa
2010-07-10 01:47 am UTC (link)
Arrogant Pickpockets?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]staroverthebay
2010-07-10 01:20 am UTC (link)
Absolutely Preposterous.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map