Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



I wish I was boning vampires. ([info]tehrin) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2010-08-13 02:06:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Librarian Wank
As we know from Harry Potter, children's books are serious business.

Dougal the Garbage Dump Bear is an award-winning Australian children’s book about the adventures of a teddy bear who gets "drunk" on ginger beer. A librarian submits the book to Awful Library Books because the bear falls asleep on a couch and "no one needs to sleep off a soda!" so it was weeded from the library she works at for fear of offending conservative parents despite having received no complaints, taking the book home for herself for her own collection.



She had done so without knowing the provence and popularity of the book. Posters in the comments swiftly bring this to her attention. At large, the majority of the commenters are civil and there are also defenders in the wank. Some do accuse the submitter of being a “poor librarian” and are not so civil:

This is such a cute book, why is it here? I think you meant to submit it to Awful Library Patrons :)

Wow. I’ve never been moved to write in to disagree with a weed before, but here’s a tip, submitter: when you bring the book home because of its quality, having weeded because of a few hysterical returns, you’re one of the bad guys. Think it through for a moment: if it’s a valuable addition to your home library, then it’s a valuable book for the public, too, isn’t it?
Sorry, but censorship isn’t the same as weeding.
P.S.: There’s nothing offensive about “sleeping off” ginger beer, either.


It doesn’t get truly wanky until the submitter, Raeanna, shows up. Apparantly the book was shown to some of the library regulars before the weeding took place. Raeanna comments to posters MULTIPLE TIMES using the YOU DON’T KNOW ME defense and, in the words of the mouse who reported it:

- Why are you so mean?
- I thought this was meant to be fun!
- I will NEVER SUBMIT HERE AGAIN!

We were trying to be sensitive to the needs of the public. We live in a very small, conservative town. Everyone has their opinions, but our librarians don’t need to be called insensitive or need to be jumped on. Some of you are just being nasty about it. I probably won’t post anything here anymore because I don’t need people getting uptight about things. I thought this was supposed to be fun.

We haven’t banned it or put out a hit on the author! We don’t get rid of books that personally offend us or refuse any sort of liberal material. Don’t knock us until you’ve been in our shoes and have been ripped into shreds by a devout Christian parent who feels we’ve put something ‘inappropriate” out.
We’re not shoving Ann Coulter down people’s throats, for goodness sake.
Everyone just cool your jets! Yeesh


If you have such a respect for librarians and the field, then you should consider being decent instead of jumping down other librarian’s throats and making rash conclusions about that person’s decision. It was a few very capable librarians who made the decision, and it’s not your job to tell us we’re horrible at our job. Honestly, I’m sorry we’re not all as perfect as we should be.
We know how our community is, and you don’t. I never said that children would act drunk, and I do have respect for others, including young people. I just have respect for our parents and know that they wouldn’t appreciate it. Don’t accuse me of a thing until you know me!
Honestly, if you don’t like our decision, then don’t even comment. I’m sick of everyone accusing me of this and that, suggesting I’m an awful librarian, and being rude. Thanks for giving me a fair shake everybody! Nothing like librarians jumping on top of each other...fun...


Wow, it’s very very rude of you to say that I and then the other librarians I work with deserve to be removed from the profession. I don’t care what your opinion is, that’s just very rude. You have no clue how I am in my library and with my patrons, and I don’t need some self-righteous librarian telling me I don’t deserve to be one.
I wasn’t aware that you’re perfect at the job. I understand everyone’s opinion, and I’ve been beaten up enough about it. But, what you said about that was just wrong, and it’s wonderful to see you have so much respect for other librarians.
I see that taking away a book that didn’t fit in our library is super wrong, but going on a message board and being beyond rude to a peer is perfectly acceptable in the field. Thanks for your comments.


Eventually Raeanna finally flounces this time forever(after saying she was going to stop commenting a couple times previously), vowing never again to comment on the post.

You know, I’m just done. This whole thing has gotten out of control, and this is a fight no one is going to win. I, for one, really don’t have the time or the desire to be on here fighting with complete strangers all day. I’ve already said more than I need to, and this topic is officially closed in my mind. I hope others will follow suit. Best of luck to all of you.



Thanks to the mouse on [info]wank_report for reporting this.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]sepiamagpie
2010-08-13 10:11 am UTC (link)
Just wait until the sequel with the pixie stix and his adorable little bear nose and him knifing that guy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tofuknight
2010-08-13 11:21 am UTC (link)
I'm sorry. I can't pay attention to Australian librarians getting their panties in a twist because of drunk teddy bears when your icon is so cute.

*stares at cute*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]oxfordcomma
2010-08-13 05:24 pm UTC (link)
I'm pretty sure the librarian who did the weeding was red-state Amur'k'n.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2010-08-13 11:40 am UTC (link)
In the third book, he rents himself out as a sex toy to pay for his marshmallow creme habit. Also, there's donuts.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tehrin
2010-08-13 04:08 pm UTC (link)
Which one does he get busted for peddling Sweet Tarts and candy necklaces and the stuffed rabbit, his depraved!alternative sexuality friend, ODs?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2010-08-13 04:47 pm UTC (link)
Hmmmm, I think the fourth or fifth, maybe? It's the same one where he gets the cavity search and they find cotton candy all up inside his stuffing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]librarianmouse
2010-08-14 02:46 am UTC (link)
Candy necklaces are the fifth. The fourth is the one with the gummi bear smuggling ring.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kaesa
2010-08-14 07:53 pm UTC (link)
I think you mean snuggling ring.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pandonkey
2010-08-13 10:29 pm UTC (link)
What are the donuts filled with?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2010-08-14 02:35 am UTC (link)
You don't even want to know. ;_;

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]silrana
2010-08-13 10:58 pm UTC (link)
Somehow I wouldn't be surprised.

Sorry, I agree that the librarian handled things badly, but I don't find drunkenness the least bit cute. I wouldn't yell at a librarian or cause a scene if one of my girls checked it out of the library, but my reaction wouldn't be 'oh how adorable' either.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2010-08-13 11:40 pm UTC (link)
Because it's totally likely the stuffed bear is going to knife someone.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2010-08-13 11:42 pm UTC (link)
They're not themselves when they drink. You KNOW that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2010-08-13 11:44 pm UTC (link)
The bear has a problem and it's tearing our family apart!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2010-08-13 11:46 pm UTC (link)
Yes. *sob* God, yes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]silrana
2010-08-14 12:09 am UTC (link)
Sure, it's completely ridiculous. Totally silly. But then, if someone had told me that a writer thought it was cute to have a stuffed bear getting drunk and passing out, I would have thought that was completely ridiculous, too.

*shrugs* Chalk it up to a personal thing. I don't find drunks funny and never have. Characters that intentionally get drunk turn me off in the books I read. I avoid people who get drunk in RL. So a book that tells my kids that getting drunk was a great thing to do is not going to be on my 'great books' list.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2010-08-14 02:38 am UTC (link)
Somehow I wouldn't be surprised.

Seriously? Really? It's a fucking children's book and you wouldn't be surprised if the teddy bear knifed a guy? Are you fucking insane?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]silrana
2010-08-14 03:17 am UTC (link)
It was meant in the spirit of "this is so ridiculous, what's next?" I guess I should have put a /sarcasm tag or something on it, but I thought it was pretty obvious that I wouldn't actually expect that to happen in a kids' book. But considering how many whacko things wind up in wank reports, I guess I can understand how it could get taken wrong. So to be perfectly clear, no, I wouldn't truly expect that to find a teddy bear stabbing someone in a children's book.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map