|
|
bukowski (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} bukowski) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} otf_wank, |
I love how she was like, "I didn't tell anyone not to do NaNoWriMo!" Did she even read her own article?
But my absolute favorite comment on that is the one by "E. Miller" on the first page, which is full of nonsensical analogies like this one:
12. Literary culture isn't a temple, it's an ecosystem. Writers can be readers, readers can be critics, critics can be writers, audiences can have a voice.
Yes, and predators can be omnivores, but you can't have more predation than prey in a sustainable ecosystem. Literary culture requires more readers than writers. That's the ecology of it. Miller is right. You're wrong, and helping NaNoWriMo undermine the literary ecology.
Writers are... predators? They eat their readers? HOW ON EARTH DOES ANYONE THINK THAT MAKES SENSE
But my absolute favorite comment on that is the one by "E. Miller" on the first page, which is full of nonsensical analogies like this one:
12. Literary culture isn't a temple, it's an ecosystem. Writers can be readers, readers can be critics, critics can be writers, audiences can have a voice.
Yes, and predators can be omnivores, but you can't have more predation than prey in a sustainable ecosystem. Literary culture requires more readers than writers. That's the ecology of it. Miller is right. You're wrong, and helping NaNoWriMo undermine the literary ecology.
Writers are... predators? They eat their readers? HOW ON EARTH DOES ANYONE THINK THAT MAKES SENSE
Post a comment in response:
