No, actually I was quite interested. I have had similiar conversations (and rants to be honest) about my position on the character of Daniel Jackson and how I'd want him to DIAF if he was a real person.

I'm an academic enough to recognize and chuckle at the academic world stuff that Bones touches. My only encounters with anthro outside of General Anthropology when I was an undergrad have been ethnographies assigned to me in grad school in history. As has been pointed out up thread, history tends to steal from a lot of other disciplines. Especially when we're trying to work around the bias' of surviving sources. I'm a particular flavor of historian that borrows more than others, but it's still reading others work not understanding the field as an insider.