Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



duraniedrama ([info]duraniedrama) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2011-01-15 09:58:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
First One Digital Publishing--Sign Away All Your Rights and PAY Us For It!
So a new ebook publisher called First One Digital Publishing and they're holding a contest called Who Wants to be an Author? Sounds nifty, right? Then you have a look at the rules.

Okay, must be original, must be in English, Microsoft Word format, yadda, yadda, yadda . . .

7. FEES: There will be a $149.00 entrance fee for each submission. The fee must be paid online before the manuscript will be accepted.

Wait, WHAT?

One Grand-Prize Winner will receive:

• First One Publishing contract for terrestrial and digital publication of winning book.
• Five thousand ($5,000) cash
• A complete marketing and publicity tour tied to the winning book.
• First One Publishing Library (20 books valued at $240.00)
• Grand-Prize Winner must sign the publishing contract, which contains additional terms and conditions in order to be published.

Twenty Second-Prize Winners will receive:

• A First One Publishing contract for digital publication
• A complete marketing and publicity plan to promote the digital book as well as feature placement (bio, blog, etc.) on the First One Publishing website.
• A First One Publishing Collection (10 books valued at $120)
• Second-Prize Winners must sign the publishing contract, which contains additional terms and conditions in order to be published.


So, a $149 "entry fee" for a shot at a $5,000, um, award? Advance? Oh, and you get published! Yay! Right?

Then we get to the dreaded Paragraph 13:

All submissions become sole property of Sponsor and will not be acknowledged or returned. By submitting an entry, all entrants grant Sponsor the absolute and unconditional right and authority to copy, edit, publish, promote, broadcast, or otherwise use, in whole or in part, their entries, in perpetuity, in any manner without further permission, notice or compensation. Entries that contain copyrighted material must include a release from the copyright holder. Prizes are nontransferable. No substitutions or cash redemptions, except by Sponsor in the event of prize unavailability. Sponsor reserves the right to its sole discretion to not publish the winning entry for any reason whatsoever.
In the event that there is an insufficient number of entries received that meet the minimum standards determined by the judges, all prizes will not be awarded.


Pay $149, lose all your rights to your own work and maybe we'll publish you or something.

Laura Anne Gilman is not impressed.

Neither is Janet Reid.

Nor John Scalzi.

Okay, so a budding self publisher does something stupid and writers warn them about it. Where's the wank, exactly?

That would be where Karen Hunter herself shows up in the comments of Janet Reid's blog and also in the comments in this thread at the Absolute Write forums.

Could I, a 20-year veteran in publishing as a writer and publisher, afford to put out a contest that rips people off? I'm not desperate. The goal is to truly find the next great author, something not too many people are actually looking for. What's been your success track record?

Note she asks for the 'success track record' of Janet Reid.

On Absolute Write, she drops such gems as:

And regarding the term "major publisher," which seems to be a point of conversation, First One will be releasing 5-10 titles a month. I think that's pretty major. Don't you?

LOL...to most of the responses. Here's the deal: If you want to be a part of something bigger than what you're currently doing, join us. Be a part of the solution, not a part of the naysaying and the problem. It's very easy to sit on the sidelines and poke holes at everything. It is far more difficult to get out there and do something different. That's what we're doing.

Again, we're grateful for the feedback because it certainly forces us to do a better job, which we will. But it seems as if the comments and the criticisms are not edifying. If your goal is to be a boo-bird. Good job. If you're goal is to help change publishing, get in the game and let's play.


And play they do. Two pages so far and it may yet blossom into greater things if she comes back to bawwwww some more.

ETA: Smart Bitches, Trashy Books weighs in. (Thanks to [info]midnight_hawk for the tip.) The comments also link to a "contest" by Evil Reads, with additional suggested clauses in the comments. ([info]khym_chanur finds quite possibly the best one here.)

It's also hit sf_drama. (Thanks to [info]seiberwing.)

ETA Part Deax: aaaaaand, the rules now lead to a 404 page. (Per John Scalzi via [info]sistercoyote.)


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]varethane
2011-01-15 06:42 pm UTC (link)
From the Absolute Write thread:

Just as American Idol has given us Kelly Clarkson, Fantasia, Jennifer Hudson, Clay Aiken, and so many, many more, First One will deliver the next Stephen King, Nicholas Sparks, and Stephenie Meyer.

....The fact that they're holding up Meyer as an example of a Great Writer is telling, I think.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ruffwriter
2011-01-15 06:53 pm UTC (link)
And Nicholas Sparks, for that matter.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]librarianmouse
2011-01-15 07:33 pm UTC (link)
Nicholas Sparks, who claims not to be a romance writer?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarkhunter
2011-01-16 11:34 pm UTC (link)
PFFFFT.

Of course, Diana Gabaldon claims the same thing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ekaterinv
2011-01-15 08:05 pm UTC (link)
Yep, Nicholas Sparks is just as bad. He just doesn't get as much flak. (Unfairly.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tehrin
2011-01-15 08:31 pm UTC (link)
I've never read one of his books or seen a movie based on them. They seem like they'd bore the shit out of me. Is he really that bad?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]librarianmouse
2011-01-15 08:34 pm UTC (link)
He's not Dan Brown bad, but he's not fantastic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ruffwriter
2011-01-15 09:08 pm UTC (link)
His sappy writing aside, my main problem with him is that for one of his books (Message in a Bottle?) had one character write a love letter to another. The text was actually taken straight from a Civil War-era love letter that has been featured in several documentaries and such. And yet no one has called him on this!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bobafeis
2011-01-16 08:48 am UTC (link)
I tried one but I only got fifty pages in before it bored the shit out of me. The girl who recommended it to me summarized the rest for me (and it didn't inspire me to keep reading) and then came back half an hour later, told me she was thinking of the wrong one and told me the correct summary. Which was pretty the same much the first one, only in a different order. All those jokes that he just cuts and pastes plot elements? Apparently true!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chienne
2011-01-19 04:00 am UTC (link)
To put it simply: His books all seem to take place within a Thomas Kinkade painting.

If you aren't the type of person who is moved to tears by Hallmark movies, you probably won't like Nicholas Sparks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tehrin
2011-01-19 05:02 am UTC (link)
Why did you have to use that name?

I'm a painter. That's just cruel.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]librarianmouse
2011-01-19 05:12 am UTC (link)
Heck, I love the Hallmark channel and I can't read Nicholas Sparks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eleutheria
2011-01-15 11:22 pm UTC (link)
I have no idea who Nicholas Sparks even is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sistercoyote
2011-01-16 01:42 am UTC (link)
90% of guy dies, girl mourns "Romances" starring Sandra Bullock.

Okay, maybe less.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarkhunter
2011-01-16 11:34 pm UTC (link)
The other 10% are "girl dies, guy mourns."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tehrin
2011-01-15 07:40 pm UTC (link)
One of these things is not like the others!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tehrin
2011-01-15 07:47 pm UTC (link)
Also, its Stephen King, Toni Morrison, Nicholas Sparks, and Stephenie Meyer now. Looks like someone noticed they forgot to include a PoC.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]darksumomo
2011-01-15 11:17 pm UTC (link)
Until Toni Morrison's name was added, it showed that they were more interested in best sellers than great literature.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarkhunter
2011-01-16 11:35 pm UTC (link)
Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. There's nothing wrong with wanting to write bestsellers.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]greymouse
2011-01-17 11:52 am UTC (link)
So, uh, I don't listen to that sort of music in the first place, but Pop Idol/American Idol are being presented as some sort of Holy Grail of music here? Or did those shows manage to produce someone halfway competent? (actual question)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarkhunter
2011-01-17 03:21 pm UTC (link)
YMMV, but I think both Kelly Clarkson and Carrie Underwood are pretty good.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kumquat_of_doom
2011-01-19 03:36 pm UTC (link)
Kelly Clarkson's pretty good, I agree. And in the UK, the original versions of those shows and spin-offs have given us Will Young and (although they're VERY YMMVy) Girls Aloud, neither of whom are half bad. Will Young deserves his career just for All Time Love and being whole-heartedly adorable.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map