Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Loopywafflehead ([info]loopywafflehead) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2012-01-07 21:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:authorwank

'I didn't make it up, beyotch! I had a friend who faked her own kidnapping!'
Many thanks to the anon on wank_report for this one.

Julie Halpern is an author of YA books. She discovers the following review of her book, Don’t Stop Now:

I had high hopes for Don’t Stop Now by Julie Halpern. Y’all, it is a road trip book. Enough said. I love road trip books. Several of my favorite YA contemporary roads involve them. Needless to say, I was hoping to add Don’t Stop Now to that list. Unfortunately – it let me down in a big way.

The plot of Don’t Stop Now is totally weird. Lillian finds out that her friend Penny has faked her own kidnapping. She decides to track Penny down because the police and FBI are all over the situation. Lillian is freaked out. Can I just say – uhhh. The entire Penny debacle was kinda ridiculous. A plot line made up so that a road trip could come into play is what I got out of it. Lillian recruits her best friend Josh (and Josh’s car and credit card) to take her to Oregon – and Penny. Totally throwaway.

Anyway, putting all that aside. Lillian isn’t the smartest gal I’ve come across. For reasons other than heading out to find Penny herself instead of just telling the FBI where she is. She is wondering whether or not she and Josh should be more than friends. Well, I can take that one: NO.

To be frank (and slightly mean), Josh is a sorry excuse for a male MC. He is a total jerk. (Take my word for it. I’ve already given my copy of Don’t Stop Now away so I can include specific examples.) Lillian was funny, mostly intelligent (other than in her choice of friends) and incredibly nice. Girl: you can do better. I promise.

So, I don’t really much to say about this one other than the negative. The plot and characters completely let me down. Even if you’re normally a fan of road trip books – I don’t recommend Don’t Stop Now. If you have read and enjoyed it – make sure and let me know what I missed! I love talking to people with different opinions.


Enjoy the author's mature and professional response under the cut!


Halpern's first post (all posts have sadly been deleted but you can read the comments on this one via Google cache):


Google Trash

I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself, and I came across a nasty review of "Don't Stop Now." I ALMOST responded. I fucking hate people who write nasty reviews! You already know that if you've read this blog post of mine. (Um, you probably already know that anyway.) There is nothing redeeming about this one. And, like I noted in my other post, the blogger goes there: "A plot line made up so that a road trip could come into play." Ugh! I didn't make it up, beyotch! I had a friend who faked her own kidnapping! Grrrr. She insults my main character and writes this amazingly insightful line in her "review" : "The plot of Don’t Stop Now is totally weird." Wow. Great. Okay. What really pisses me off is this blog has a ton of followers, who, by the two comments already posted, are just as delightful and loving as the blogger.

I know it should not matter what this blogger says about my book (and after just reading her bio, which has much in the way of potential mocking, I am just going to rise above). Because I am already SO FAR ABOVE in my life. Ooh, that was kind of mean, right? But I know this type of person, one who doesn't have their own accomplishments so they have to dog on anyone and anything to make themselves feel bigger and better. That's all bullies are, right? And hilariously, the internet has turned so many of the once bullied into bullies. Now that they have a voice and an audience, it's time for their power to come to fruition. But they're going about it the wrong way.

Negativity is never the way to beat down those who tormented you (is this sounding like I tormented bloggers? I just mean that, in my opinion, those who write critical reviews lacking in any actual thoughtful criticism obviously have some issues they're working through from the safety of their computer desk). Instead, why don't you get out and do something great for the world? Create something meaningful. Find happiness. Because what you're doing is DISCOURAGING PEOPLE FROM READING. Even a negative review, when written well and from an open-minded perspective, can give readers insight into whether they, no matter how the reviewer feels about a book, might like it. As a librarian, I may hate some books, but I would NEVER stop someone from reading a book. I even suggest books I hate to people because who am I to say whether someone else should or should not read a book? So, Ms. Blogger, you say you'd like to get your Library Science degree? Time to start thinking like a librarian.

I guess I did respond.



After receiving a slew of negative comments (including one from a friend of the reviewer), she responds with a second post:


Oh, Internet, How I Love and Loathe You

Take a breather, everyone. Geez! I am sorry to say that I will not even read all of the comments on my blog because I don't like the negativity. Yes, I was negative. Yes, that is hypocritical. But understand this: bashing a review of a book? That's bashing a few paragraphs that someone put some minutes into. Bashing a novel that someone put their heart soul, time, and life into? WAY DIFFERENT. And if you think my blog was not cool in some way because I used the word "beyotch" then you obviously wouldn't find my books funny anyway.

All of y'all who said I was mean because I mentioned things from the blogger's bio: you are correct. But one can never assume that what an author writes in their fiction is "unrealistic" or "ridiculous" because SHIT HAPPENS. To all of us. Do those of you who wrote negative things feel better? Is this how we should be spending our time? I'm writing a response because I don't feel good about saying mean things about the blogger. I apologize for that. But I hope this is a wake up call to bloggers that AUTHORS ARE READING YOUR REVIEWS. That doesn't mean you need to like every book, but try to be a little more thoughtful about the way you see things. I wake up and google myself because I love to read NICE things people say about my books. I love to find a teen who discovered something that they related to, or an adult who was bummed out and read one of my books and laughed, or song lyrics someone composed for a school assignment about one of my books.

I wish there was a "Negative Review" internet filter because then I wouldn't run into any of the things that ruin my day. It's very hurtful to know that so many people are reading negative things about something I worked so hard on, something I may or may not have lived through, and something I really like. Think about that. So all you book bloggers out there, try to make your next review a positive one about a book you really liked. Let's get more people reading instead of spewing hate.



And then, finally, the last post:


One More Time

Please stop commenting on my posts if you are unhappy with what I write. If you don't want to read what I write, as many of you said in previous comments, then stop reading it. It's making me sick that people are getting off on keeping this up.


ETA: Added link to the author's blog, which I forgot to do the first time around.

ETAx2: Broke up the text so it's easier to read. And it seems this is the month for author freakouts (thanks for the link, [info]cleolinda): http://cuddlebuggery.blogspot.com/2012/01/first-five-days-on-goodreads.html



(Post a new comment)


[info]kitt_in_socks
2012-01-07 09:22 pm UTC (link)
"I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself"

That tells me everything I need to know about this writer.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]oxfordcomma
2012-01-07 09:25 pm UTC (link)
I know, right? I love how she says that as if it's just What One Does Of A Morning.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]oxfordcomma, 2012-01-07 09:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-07 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxfordcomma, 2012-01-07 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-07 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2012-01-07 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2012-01-08 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2012-01-07 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2012-01-10 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jkefka, 2012-01-08 02:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_tean, 2012-01-08 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2012-01-08 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2012-01-08 07:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2012-01-08 01:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]meagenimage, 2012-01-08 02:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2012-01-08 04:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beejium, 2012-01-08 05:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-08 06:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moongazingfae, 2012-01-08 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-08 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]abharding, 2012-01-08 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaythenerdkid, 2012-01-09 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2012-01-13 05:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-13 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2012-01-13 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-13 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]full_metal_ox, 2012-01-08 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]life_on_mars, 2012-01-08 09:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]schrodingerscat, 2012-01-09 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2012-01-09 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2012-01-09 08:55 pm UTC

[info]yattara
2012-01-07 09:24 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I love it when authors overreact to bad reviews. Totally makes my weekend.

(Reply to this)


[info]oxfordcomma
2012-01-07 09:25 pm UTC (link)
So all you book bloggers out there, try to make your next review a positive one

"NO NEGATIVE REVIEWS EVER BECAUSE I AUTHORS ~TRY SO HARD~! But let's pretend this is just about getting more people to read and not about my own inability to take criticism!"

(Reply to this)


[info]the_seventh_l
2012-01-07 09:30 pm UTC (link)
I had never heard of Julie Halpern until I had read about this due to a comment in SF_D . . . and now I'm pretty sure I will never read any of her books. What a ~classy~ response to a review, Miss Halpern.

(Reply to this)


[info]oxfordcomma
2012-01-07 09:38 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and now the last "One More Time" post is deleted, too, leaving only an extremely un-charming post about a dream that probably reveals more about her issues than she thinks it does.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]oxfordcomma, 2012-01-07 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-07 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-07 10:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxfordcomma, 2012-01-08 04:46 am UTC

[info]the__ivorytower
2012-01-07 10:29 pm UTC (link)
That's a whole lot of textwall. It walls textfully.

If the author doesn't like reading negative things about herself, perhaps she shouldn't... google herself?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-08 09:42 am UTC

[info]ekaterinv
2012-01-07 10:30 pm UTC (link)
A whole lot of negative reviews on amazon are ill-founded and just... wrong. And it's frustrating that people listen to those. But jeez, this woman's a published author -- she got the brass ring. If she were really "so far above", she wouldn't stoop to personally criticize and insult someone just because that person didn't like her book.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2012-01-08 08:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2012-01-08 09:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bobafeis, 2012-01-08 12:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2012-01-08 08:44 pm UTC

[info]keri
2012-01-07 10:56 pm UTC (link)
I felt really bad when I wrote a review of THAT IS ALL and my twitter summary said "It wasn't quite what I was hoping for, but only because @hodgman's first book was PERFECT and who can reach perfection again?" and basically the whole deal was that while I love his writing, the first one really is one of my favorite books, and it's hard to duplicate that unless you exceed it, and so the new one just didn't measure up (that's the problem with super loving one of an author's book). Anyway, both the full review and tweet came out a lot more negative than my actual thoughts, because I focused too much on exactly what didn't work for me, and Hodgman saw it and apologised for my not liking it and then thanked me for reading anyway.

So I felt bad. I didn't want one of my favorite celebrities to think I hated his book, and that seemed to be what he thought! I actually really liked it and plan to reread it!

But now? Now I don't feel so bad at all. One mild misunderstanding of intent (which is partly my own fault) is NOTHING compared to this crazy mess. And the review is still pretty good! I find myself interested in reading at least a chapter or so of the book, to see if it's something I'd like to read more of!

Also this line: But I know this type of person, one who doesn't have their own accomplishments so they have to dog on anyone and anything to make themselves feel bigger and better.

WOW. The writer was a book reviewer. I'm pretty sure they don't give negative reviews simply to bully authors and make themself feel powerful.

(Reply to this)


[info]sandglass
2012-01-07 11:19 pm UTC (link)
I really was not expecting the title of this post to be a direct quote.

Because I am already SO FAR ABOVE in my life.

HOW ARE YOU PUBLISHED?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-07 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-08 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sandglass, 2012-01-08 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-10 10:03 am UTC

[info]cleolinda
2012-01-07 11:50 pm UTC (link)
There was an OUTBREAK of anti-reviewer wank this week on GoodReads/Twitter/author blogs, and the terrifying part was that there were like four or five different incidents that had nothing to do with each other.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2012-01-08 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2012-01-08 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oxfordcomma, 2012-01-08 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]supersyncspaz7, 2012-01-08 05:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-08 09:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2012-01-10 01:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2012-01-08 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bobafeis, 2012-01-08 12:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2012-01-10 02:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2012-01-10 09:25 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2012-01-08 12:16 am UTC (link)
When I left, I ran into Peter Dinklage. I wrapped my arms around him and said, "Thank god there's someone cool here, Dinklage." He seemed both annoyed and flattered. Then I tried to take a nap with him. He wouldn't stand for that, and soon Matt came over, fumbling with a wrapped box. Standing next to him was Gibby from iCarly! At the exact same time, Matt presented me with an engagement ring and Gibby asked, "Will you go to prom with me?">/i>

Oooooooooookay.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]shinga, 2012-01-08 12:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lied_ohne_worte, 2012-01-08 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lied_ohne_worte, 2012-01-08 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]risha, 2012-01-08 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jadeleopard, 2012-01-08 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2012-01-08 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dorothy1901, 2012-01-08 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2012-01-08 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kitt_in_socks, 2012-01-08 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2012-01-08 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2012-01-08 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-08 09:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 10:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2012-01-08 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 10:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2012-01-08 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2012-01-08 07:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mareen, 2012-01-08 07:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2012-01-08 07:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mareen, 2012-01-08 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2012-01-08 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 09:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2012-01-08 09:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2012-01-08 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-09 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yoritomo_reiko, 2012-01-08 03:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-08 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2012-01-08 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nightwithmoon, 2012-01-09 07:00 am UTC

[info]risha
2012-01-08 12:36 am UTC (link)
I always love it when they acknowledge that they're being hypocritical by posting a negative review of a (actually not very mean) negative review.

(Reply to this)


[info]gertie_flirty
2012-01-08 01:00 am UTC (link)
With all her "I won't read anything negative!" spiel, I am amazed at the fact that someone this incredibly sensitive managed to even get a book published.

It must have been vanity published. I can't imagine her working with a professional editor.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2012-01-08 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2012-01-08 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2012-01-08 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nightwithmoon, 2012-01-09 07:03 am UTC

[info]cmdr_zoom
2012-01-08 01:43 am UTC (link)
And this is why "writing what you know" can actually be really bad, when readers point out that you your main character was a total idiot who made a lot of bad decisions.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2012-01-08 10:23 am UTC

[info]iamnotyourmuse
2012-01-08 02:22 am UTC (link)
The author's name sounded familiar so I looked her up and... Yes, I have read one of her books. And it wasn't all that and a biscuit and you know what? I've never recommended it to someone. Being a librarian, sometimes I do have to suck up my personal preferences and recommend books that I didn't or wouldn't enjoy (sports fiction = not my thing, but it is popular with some of my patrons), but that doesn't mean I recommend things I feel are poorly written. Being a librarian does not mean you have to endorse every single book, regardless of quality.

I looked up the book's professional reviews and they're mostly positive, but three out of the five I looked at also mentioned negative points such as lack of credibility/realism for the plot (which Kirkus stated makes the book feel like fantasy) and lack of depth for one of the heavier threads in the story. Which, huh, do sound a bit like the review Halpern is complaining about. Guess she didn't read those, since they weren't glowing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2012-01-08 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamnotyourmuse, 2012-01-08 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragoness_e, 2012-01-08 03:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iris, 2012-01-09 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamnotyourmuse, 2012-01-09 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iris, 2012-01-09 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iamnotyourmuse, 2012-01-09 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2012-01-09 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nightwithmoon, 2012-01-09 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]undomielregina, 2012-01-10 09:24 pm UTC

[info]dragoness_e
2012-01-08 02:51 am UTC (link)
Compare and contrast with John Scalzi's reaction to poor reviews: Mmmm… One Star-rific!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]duraniedrama, 2012-01-09 04:45 am UTC

[info]adverb
2012-01-08 05:25 am UTC (link)
I'm reminded of the time when, on my LJ, I talked to a friend about Max Allan Collins' CSI novels and mentioned that they weren't bad, but they were horribly formulaic, and I got an anonymous hissy-fit comment supposedly from him.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2012-01-08 09:00 am UTC

[info]ashenmote
2012-01-08 10:22 am UTC (link)
Because what you're doing is DISCOURAGING PEOPLE FROM READING.

I know! It happens a lot to me. I look for something to read but then I see a negative book review and end up playing arcade games instead. That sucks!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]meagenimage, 2012-01-08 01:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady7jane, 2012-01-08 02:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2012-01-08 03:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2012-01-08 03:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2012-01-08 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2012-01-08 04:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-08 07:10 pm UTC

[info]gerorin
2012-01-08 05:35 pm UTC (link)
So a few days a go I had a dream where I share this huge class on...something with this Japanese idol Akanishi Jin (whom I can't even stand) and I was avoiding doing a group assignment with him but ended up having to do it after all. It was pretty wtf-inducing since Univ was a few years a go, too.

Now that I've shared something nobody cares about on the internet, can I be a whiny author too? I promise I'll use the word beyotch, too.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]librarianmouse, 2012-01-08 08:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]full_metal_ox, 2012-01-08 09:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-08 10:22 pm UTC

[info]visp
2012-01-08 07:20 pm UTC (link)
You know what the funniest bit of this is? I wouldn't have given that negative review any thought without the author's reaction.

It's perfectly believable that some dumb kid would fake a kidnapping. It's been done. And believable that a friend would want to find out what's going on without alerting the authorities first. Maybe not the smartest move, but I could see it happening, especially with young, not-too-bright, don't-always-think-things-through types. And since the reviewer can't give any solid examples of why the male character's such a jerk, I wouldn't pay too much attention to that.

But reading the author's response instantly tells me that 1. she can't write for crap, her book probably does suck, and 2. she's a whiny drama queen with a rather odd grasp of reality, so the reviewer's probably right about the books being unrealistic.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gerorin, 2012-01-09 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-09 09:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2012-01-09 02:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-10 10:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-11 04:16 am UTC

[info]demonbean
2012-01-08 08:18 pm UTC (link)
I wake up and google myself because I love to read NICE things people say about my books.

The internet is going to chew you up and spit you out.

Also, how long is it going to be until authors learn that trying to combat negative reviews just does not go well?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2012-01-08 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2012-01-08 10:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]life_on_mars, 2012-01-09 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2012-01-10 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2012-01-11 04:33 pm UTC

[info]poisonyoulove
2012-01-09 04:55 am UTC (link)
I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself

I like to do that at night instead, helps me fall asleep . . . wait.


And if you think my blog was not cool in some way because I used the word "beyotch" then you obviously wouldn't find my books funny anyway.

Well, if that's your idea of wit, that's just sad.


Do those of you who wrote negative things feel better?

I do. Thank you!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-10 10:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2012-01-11 04:36 pm UTC

[info]jupiterpluvius
2012-01-10 02:17 am UTC (link)
I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself

MADAM I BELIEVE I SEE YOUR PROBLEM NOW

(Reply to this)


[info]ekaterinv
2012-01-14 09:43 am UTC (link)
Julie Halpern comments on how icky she feels that all these mean people are looking at "the one post where I deviated from my normal, nice, hilarious self" and was "human" (unlike "actors and celebrities"): http://juliehalpern.blogspot.com/

Hey y'all, didn't you know she writes ~hilarious~ posts, and we should be looking at those? Also her breastfeeding post? Instead of looking at a post where she flips her shit? This eats her up! Obviously we are very bad people and thank the gods Julie Halpern is here to tell us so, in purple text on a lavender background.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-14 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loopywafflehead, 2012-01-14 01:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2012-01-15 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2012-01-14 08:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jasonvermilion, 2012-01-29 03:14 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map