Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Loopywafflehead ([info]loopywafflehead) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2012-01-07 21:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:authorwank

'I didn't make it up, beyotch! I had a friend who faked her own kidnapping!'
Many thanks to the anon on wank_report for this one.

Julie Halpern is an author of YA books. She discovers the following review of her book, Don’t Stop Now:

I had high hopes for Don’t Stop Now by Julie Halpern. Y’all, it is a road trip book. Enough said. I love road trip books. Several of my favorite YA contemporary roads involve them. Needless to say, I was hoping to add Don’t Stop Now to that list. Unfortunately – it let me down in a big way.

The plot of Don’t Stop Now is totally weird. Lillian finds out that her friend Penny has faked her own kidnapping. She decides to track Penny down because the police and FBI are all over the situation. Lillian is freaked out. Can I just say – uhhh. The entire Penny debacle was kinda ridiculous. A plot line made up so that a road trip could come into play is what I got out of it. Lillian recruits her best friend Josh (and Josh’s car and credit card) to take her to Oregon – and Penny. Totally throwaway.

Anyway, putting all that aside. Lillian isn’t the smartest gal I’ve come across. For reasons other than heading out to find Penny herself instead of just telling the FBI where she is. She is wondering whether or not she and Josh should be more than friends. Well, I can take that one: NO.

To be frank (and slightly mean), Josh is a sorry excuse for a male MC. He is a total jerk. (Take my word for it. I’ve already given my copy of Don’t Stop Now away so I can include specific examples.) Lillian was funny, mostly intelligent (other than in her choice of friends) and incredibly nice. Girl: you can do better. I promise.

So, I don’t really much to say about this one other than the negative. The plot and characters completely let me down. Even if you’re normally a fan of road trip books – I don’t recommend Don’t Stop Now. If you have read and enjoyed it – make sure and let me know what I missed! I love talking to people with different opinions.


Enjoy the author's mature and professional response under the cut!


Halpern's first post (all posts have sadly been deleted but you can read the comments on this one via Google cache):


Google Trash

I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself, and I came across a nasty review of "Don't Stop Now." I ALMOST responded. I fucking hate people who write nasty reviews! You already know that if you've read this blog post of mine. (Um, you probably already know that anyway.) There is nothing redeeming about this one. And, like I noted in my other post, the blogger goes there: "A plot line made up so that a road trip could come into play." Ugh! I didn't make it up, beyotch! I had a friend who faked her own kidnapping! Grrrr. She insults my main character and writes this amazingly insightful line in her "review" : "The plot of Don’t Stop Now is totally weird." Wow. Great. Okay. What really pisses me off is this blog has a ton of followers, who, by the two comments already posted, are just as delightful and loving as the blogger.

I know it should not matter what this blogger says about my book (and after just reading her bio, which has much in the way of potential mocking, I am just going to rise above). Because I am already SO FAR ABOVE in my life. Ooh, that was kind of mean, right? But I know this type of person, one who doesn't have their own accomplishments so they have to dog on anyone and anything to make themselves feel bigger and better. That's all bullies are, right? And hilariously, the internet has turned so many of the once bullied into bullies. Now that they have a voice and an audience, it's time for their power to come to fruition. But they're going about it the wrong way.

Negativity is never the way to beat down those who tormented you (is this sounding like I tormented bloggers? I just mean that, in my opinion, those who write critical reviews lacking in any actual thoughtful criticism obviously have some issues they're working through from the safety of their computer desk). Instead, why don't you get out and do something great for the world? Create something meaningful. Find happiness. Because what you're doing is DISCOURAGING PEOPLE FROM READING. Even a negative review, when written well and from an open-minded perspective, can give readers insight into whether they, no matter how the reviewer feels about a book, might like it. As a librarian, I may hate some books, but I would NEVER stop someone from reading a book. I even suggest books I hate to people because who am I to say whether someone else should or should not read a book? So, Ms. Blogger, you say you'd like to get your Library Science degree? Time to start thinking like a librarian.

I guess I did respond.



After receiving a slew of negative comments (including one from a friend of the reviewer), she responds with a second post:


Oh, Internet, How I Love and Loathe You

Take a breather, everyone. Geez! I am sorry to say that I will not even read all of the comments on my blog because I don't like the negativity. Yes, I was negative. Yes, that is hypocritical. But understand this: bashing a review of a book? That's bashing a few paragraphs that someone put some minutes into. Bashing a novel that someone put their heart soul, time, and life into? WAY DIFFERENT. And if you think my blog was not cool in some way because I used the word "beyotch" then you obviously wouldn't find my books funny anyway.

All of y'all who said I was mean because I mentioned things from the blogger's bio: you are correct. But one can never assume that what an author writes in their fiction is "unrealistic" or "ridiculous" because SHIT HAPPENS. To all of us. Do those of you who wrote negative things feel better? Is this how we should be spending our time? I'm writing a response because I don't feel good about saying mean things about the blogger. I apologize for that. But I hope this is a wake up call to bloggers that AUTHORS ARE READING YOUR REVIEWS. That doesn't mean you need to like every book, but try to be a little more thoughtful about the way you see things. I wake up and google myself because I love to read NICE things people say about my books. I love to find a teen who discovered something that they related to, or an adult who was bummed out and read one of my books and laughed, or song lyrics someone composed for a school assignment about one of my books.

I wish there was a "Negative Review" internet filter because then I wouldn't run into any of the things that ruin my day. It's very hurtful to know that so many people are reading negative things about something I worked so hard on, something I may or may not have lived through, and something I really like. Think about that. So all you book bloggers out there, try to make your next review a positive one about a book you really liked. Let's get more people reading instead of spewing hate.



And then, finally, the last post:


One More Time

Please stop commenting on my posts if you are unhappy with what I write. If you don't want to read what I write, as many of you said in previous comments, then stop reading it. It's making me sick that people are getting off on keeping this up.


ETA: Added link to the author's blog, which I forgot to do the first time around.

ETAx2: Broke up the text so it's easier to read. And it seems this is the month for author freakouts (thanks for the link, [info]cleolinda): http://cuddlebuggery.blogspot.com/2012/01/first-five-days-on-goodreads.html



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]kitt_in_socks
2012-01-07 09:22 pm UTC (link)
"I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself"

That tells me everything I need to know about this writer.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]oxfordcomma
2012-01-07 09:25 pm UTC (link)
I know, right? I love how she says that as if it's just What One Does Of A Morning.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]oxfordcomma
2012-01-07 09:27 pm UTC (link)
Not to mention the imprecise use of language. The Google search is literally what awoke her? Or was so closely connected to her awakening that she could appropriately use the word "with"?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]loopywafflehead
2012-01-07 09:32 pm UTC (link)
All I know is that it sounds filthy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]oxfordcomma
2012-01-07 09:43 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps she is a victim of abstinence-only education.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]loopywafflehead
2012-01-07 09:47 pm UTC (link)
LOL well played.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]magnolia_mama, 2012-01-07 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2012-01-08 03:27 am UTC

[info]kitt_in_socks
2012-01-07 11:12 pm UTC (link)
She actually googles herself in her sleep, then wakes up while on the computer.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eleutheria
2012-01-10 12:38 am UTC (link)
I can actually see that to some degree. I know I've had plenty of mornings where I staggered around getting my breakfast and making my tea with my eyes half closed and then, still half asleep, powered up my laptop and read something so awful that it banished the sleepiness on the spot. Then again, I take Ambien and a few other heavy meds before bedtime and I don't count myself as "woken up" until I can reasonably be expected to not fall asleep standing up or with my bread halfway to my mouth, so maybe I'm a special case.

But googling yourself as the first thing you do? Never mind the "look at me, internets, look at meeeee!"-ness of it, since the chance is there that you'll find something you don't like, why start with that? I always save the board that's likely to upset me for later in the day when I'm more awake and less automatically reactive. Just seems like good sense.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jkefka
2012-01-08 02:03 am UTC (link)
I pretty much stopped reading there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]white_tean
2012-01-08 03:29 am UTC (link)
I know, wow. I have a campaign to wipe a woman with the same name as me off of the front page of Google, and even I don't Google myself every day. Once a month, maybe?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sorchar
2012-01-08 03:39 am UTC (link)
I didn't know you could use Google for that now. Soul-searching is going to be so much faster now!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]notjo
2012-01-08 07:41 am UTC (link)
I'm really surprised at the number of people who apparently do this, or set up Google-alerts for their name. I have panics whenever I get that stupid automatic alert from academia.edu telling me that someone searched for my name and clicked on my profile and typically those are people I want to actually talk to.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]southerngaelic
2012-01-08 01:19 pm UTC (link)
Me too. Just....wow.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]meagenimage
2012-01-08 02:31 pm UTC (link)
I awoke this morning with my usual google search of myself

Yeah, that made me go "ooh, hang on a sec, I'm getting the popcorn".

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]singe
2012-01-08 04:33 pm UTC (link)
I Googled myself once. Came up with a female porn star, a male extreme-fighting champ, and a chain of seafood restaurants.

Never again.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]beejium
2012-01-08 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, everyone with my name has depressingly better lives than I do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]visp
2012-01-08 06:58 pm UTC (link)
I actually love googling myself and confirming that the first few pages are of other people. Try and find me now, google-stalkers!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]moongazingfae
2012-01-08 08:11 pm UTC (link)
Same here! Luckily, I apparently share the name of a Canadian singer/songwriter so her sites generally appear first. Then, there's the crapton of other people with the same name. I love looking at Google and knowing not a single one of those results is me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-08 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]abharding, 2012-01-08 08:44 pm UTC

[info]jaythenerdkid
2012-01-09 08:42 pm UTC (link)
I'm the opposite way, I love Googling myself and seeing pages of results that are all me. There are a few people who share my real name but won't come up ahead of me on an Australian Google search, and my username is unique so a search for "jaythenerdkid" will find only me.

feelsgoodman.jpg

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chibikaijuu
2012-01-13 05:03 am UTC (link)
You literally cannot google me. My name is not *incredibly* common, but not incredibly uncommon, either, and I've done a few things online under my real name, plus been in my high school andy at the time local papers (which both published the articles online). When I first started dating my boyfriend, we both admitted to having Googled each other. He comes up on the first page. He couldn't find me at all. He actually *works* for Google (not on the main search engine, but with search applications, so...)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-13 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2012-01-13 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2012-01-13 05:50 am UTC

[info]full_metal_ox
2012-01-08 09:12 pm UTC (link)
I seem to be the only bearer of my name in the U.S.--but I have the dubious honor of sharing it with some frothing xenophobe who posts on British political boards.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]life_on_mars
2012-01-08 09:44 pm UTC (link)
I share my name with a moderately well-known soap actress in the UK which is one of many reasons I've never had anything under my own name online that connects with my real identity.

Mind you, this is an improvement; before I got married I had the same name as someone involved in an infamous series of murders ...

I'd much rather Google other people, anyway ...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]schrodingerscat
2012-01-09 01:41 am UTC (link)
Yeah, there seem to be some musicians, a 19th century women's rights activist, and some really boring people out there with my name. It's not until you actually add in swimming, which is the only thing I ever did that made it into articles of any sorts, that you get me on the front page of Google.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kookaburra
2012-01-09 07:19 pm UTC (link)
When I googled my name, I discovered there's actually someone in my hometown, with the same basic hair and eye color as me, about the same age...but she's a record-holder in javelin. I'm never getting her off the first page.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kitt_in_socks
2012-01-09 08:55 pm UTC (link)
The last time I googled my name the first result was an obituary for an elderly woman in New Mexico. It was a bit surreal.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map