Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



I put the ram in the ram-a-lam-a-ding-dong ([info]telesilla) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2003-09-06 01:16:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:confused

Why must people announce their departure?
So someone on the LJ vintage_sex community post a pic and use the word "rape" in the cut tag. Wank ensued.

But it's not really over until someone leaves in a huff. Yeah whatever. Don't let the sepia toned door hit your vintage ass on the way out.



(Post a new comment)


[info]redpanda
2003-09-06 11:38 am UTC (link)
With a friends-only journal and no contact info. What a cowardly little chickenshit. *snerk*

(Reply to this)


[info]elfy
2003-09-06 03:15 pm UTC (link)
I'm actually quite disappointed that it wasn't a wanky: "You're all a bunch of elitists!" storming off... because they seem to be the most common type out there... :D

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]moonjaguar
2003-09-06 06:59 pm UTC (link)
Devi! (okay, got my little "lookie!" about your icon out)

I think this person is a bit presumptuous with:
"anyone who was offended is a fucking annoying pussy in the first place".

People are going to get offended and there's really no way one can avoid offending someone with a picture or a few words. One's meat is another's poison and all that.

On the other hand, I think drownpsycho (or whatever her name is) was just looking for something to get pissed off about so she'd have something to fight and scream and cry about. If that picture was that offensieve to her and truly triggering for her (I'll say it again) why did she keep looking at it and posting about it?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]elfy
2003-09-07 06:13 am UTC (link)
If that picture was that offensieve to her and truly triggering for her (I'll say it again) why did she keep looking at it and posting about it?

Precisely.

That's the thing I just don't understand. I mean, it's not that hard to press back on your browser, or to close the windown, now is it? It narks me that so many people seem to have a problem with this simple action.

It's not that hard! *makes stabby at all the stupid people in the world*

[Glad you like my icon, too. :) *giggles* Worms...]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wrenlet
2003-09-06 09:40 pm UTC (link)
Ahhh, even better... (not so much with the wank yet, though. I have hopes for the comments.)

New post with the cut-tag Non-rape, non-sexist, non-objectifying, non-modern, non-offensive image behind the cut. If you're offended by non- offensive things, don't click here. If nothing offends you, don't click here.

Gotta love that sense of humor.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]nekoneko
2003-09-06 10:55 pm UTC (link)
CENSORSHIP! *wankwankwank*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]redpanda
2003-09-07 10:08 am UTC (link)
Somebody, for the luvvagod, please shovel Prozac into "Sammka."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tempslut
2003-09-06 11:46 pm UTC (link)
I'm one step ahead of you.

If I see another post on this community about how to save the drama for yo' mama, so to speak, I'm going to leave the community. Hey--I joined to peek at (non-surgically enhanced) titties and cock, not to glance at wank fodder!

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map