![[icon]](http://www.journalfen.net/userpic/67365/9138) |
The HMS STFU - OK, this is just stupid
|
| | Subject: | OK, this is just stupid | | Time: | 12:48 pm |
|
| Over on the Leaky Lounge (in Jim's thread pimping his 80,000 word opus on why HP sucks and JKR should write a new one) WalnutWandCarrier may just take the stupid cake with this gem:
"The thing about Harry's walk into the Forest, is that he hasn't chosen it himself to do that, at no point whatsoever. He learns that this is what needs to be done, and just accepts it (however he may have felt then), and does it. But he never ever chose to do it, he just displays his feelings about this fact, about learning that he has to do it, but he doesn't actually choose to do it. He's merely executing it. He accepts that he's going to do it from the very first second of the revelation on, just like a machine. He then goes on to think about his feelings towards it (towards this fact, which he has already accepted, in fact, never NOT accepted, as this fact that needs to be executed), and about what he regrets about having to leave and so on, but he never has the tiniest impulse of "I won't do it". That is a ridiculous character-portrayal, imo. It is absurd. He simply doesn't go through any character-development at all, so as to be innerly able to face such a thing in the end. He just jumped into being having no interest in life whatsoever (to exagerate a bit , but it's basically that), seeing as he's already basically like that by the end of book one (never ever having personally been interested in the slightest in the Stone at all - thus it is not heroic for him to not want it for him), and never has a serious and difficult and long inner struggle to become a true anti-hero in the end, who, out of hard development and true inner choice (a choice can only take place where there have been alternatives, btw, which isn't the case in Harry's personality at all), would be able to let lose of everything and face death. If he is already like that from the beginning, ok fine, but then what he does is not heroic because then it is utterly normal for him, like eating breakfast is for others. (I actually like to be provokative - but it's exactly like that, actually - eating breakfast would be an achievement for somebody who's been suffering from anorexia and finally manages to eat again, for example, but not if the person is already perfectly able to eat breakfast every day.) His going to his own death isn't a surprise at all, it is clear from book one on that such enormous character traits are already in him from that early on, which is simply impossible, unhuman, personality-less, empty. "
When challenged he/she responds with this:
"@Dreamteam: Well, then, show me the passage in DH where Harry actually chooses to walk into the Forest ! He doesn't !! He even doesn't think something like "Well, of course I'll go". There's not the tiniest choosing sequence or hint at something like that there. DD tells him to do it via Snape's memories, and he goes without questioning anything, without choosing anything, because he has no personality of his own. He accepts his death from the moment of the memory-revelation on, he even doesn't "accept" it at any point, he merely learns about it from the memories. In fact, he's been a dead character all along. " I guess something is not a choice unless someone actually says "I choose to do the following. I am doing all of this because I choose to." Choice can not be reasonably inferred in the HP fandom. Actions have no meaning unless that meaning is explicitly spelled out. edited for C&P fail
ETA: The twisted logic evidenced here reminds me of something I saw a Harmonian whining about once. I actually posted about it as a mouse in the JF-less sailor section of this board (In case anyone wants to go see). This is part of what I posted:
"(On Portkey) there is a discussion going on about how Neville got a hold of Gryffindor's sword when it should have been in Griphooks's posession. Many Harmonians seized upon this as an unforgivable plot-hole. Several masochistic non-Harmonians have explained that the sorting hat calls forth the sword for worthy Gryffindors in need, through, you know, magic. Several Harmonians are being deliberately obtuse in failing to understand this explanation (they're running in truly dizzying circles to avoid it, actually), and others are saying it should have been spelled out in the book (i.e. one poster said the narrative should have switced to Neville's POV for a few sentences to explain that he felt a thud on his head - yeah, that would be good writing). All of this, despite the fact that most readers capable of reasing above a third grade level did not need to have this explained in several paragraphs of exposition."
This current situation reminded me of it, because apparently it is bad writing if every little thing is not explicitly specified. Reasonable inferences can NOT be expected in good writing. | comments: Poke a delusional shipper  |
| his response to actual textual evidence by posters is even more stupid:
"Nothing of the previous posts prove anything about Harry ever chosing himself to die at all in the Forest - it all proves the contrary, in fact. He doesn't accept his death himself, Lirene, he accepts that that is the plan which, according to DD, has to be fulfilled. He blindly accepts the plan, not his death, and even less was he choosing it, but merely executing a plan which happened to involve his death. "The Forest Again"-Chapter is all about feelings towards his death (which he had already accepted ever since hearing about it merely because DD told him to do it - there's no sequence about having any reflection at all about his being supposed to die, which he accepts just like that, without the tiniest hesitation - and I don't need explicit sentences for things like that to be conveyed, but there isn't anything else neither), not about questioning whether or not he's gonna do it in the first place, and then choosing (=which would be a genuin [sic] choice then) to do it himself. And he hasn't gone through any inner death-preparation-development either throughout the series, because he has already in essentials been like that in book one, not wanting the Stone which makes you live (which is metaphorically very telling). In fact, he couldn't even have made a choice to die at all, because he was never drawn to life in the first place, he was always like that - like already dead - and it is therefore no achievement for him to die when he had already jumped into being never having cared about death at all, in the first place.
But I accept that we disagree on all that stuff." | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| (Anonymous) | | Subject: | stupid? | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-26 11:08 pm (UTC) |
|
| Evidently you and the others here didn't follow the discussion on the Leaky Lounge all that long, because as I very clearly explained there, I'm no fan whatsoever of EXPLICIT writing (as I even pointed out in the very post you're quoting above, as well as in subsequent ones), I never asked for there to be EXPLICIT sentences to show Harry's choice, in fact I think explicit writing is the most lazy writing there is. I only questioned whether Harry was merely Dumbledore's puppet, or an individual person with OWN reasoning - independently of what Dumbledore tells him. That's all, I'm not stupid, thank you, I'm merely examining the text very closely and logically (being a philosopher and mathematician, so that's where my approach to texts is coming from, and which I have the right to question). And yes, I can also agree to disagree on a subject, as I said above, which is not condescending, actually, but quite the contrary. WalnutWandCarrier
PS: I'm not the only one who's questioning Harry's independence, btw, there's also Dan Hemmens and Jim Adam, for example, and both make some well-thought-out points, as well as rubbish ones. You may want to check them out on the net. May expand your minds a bit. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
| Now I'm imagining classes in non-verbal decision making, in which many of the slower pupils insist on whispering "I choose to do the following. I am doing all of this because I choose to" instead of saying it aloud. :)
So... Harry's entire character arc from the decision not to let anybody else die for him in Half-Blood Prince, to the obsession with uniting the Hallows in order to be safe that got Dobby killed to the images of his dead friends in his mind when he discovered what he had to do... never happened, then? | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| Sure, it happened. It's just that Harry went through it passively, like a programmed robot because he never verbalized his choice. You must state a choice out loud and very specifically for it to count.
The way this person can twist the notions of choice and free will in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary makes me think they would make a brilliant defense attorney. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
| All this reminds me of parody on Goodkind which I've seen here:
Richard sat down.
The reason that Richard sat down is that he was tired from walking all day. It was an act of free will. If anyone had told him that he shouldn't sit down, he would not have listened to them because his life is his life is his own and nobody else can tell him what to do with his own life.
'It is reasonable to sit down when you are tired.' Said Richard, as he thought deeply about how much he hated prophecy because it doesn't allow for free will. 'Anyone who tells you to not sit down when you have gotten tired from walking all day is a fool, a FOOL!'"
. . . and so on for many more paragraphs. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
| The only things I've read of Goodkind are the Evil Chicken and the Glorious Statue excerpts, but that's enough for this parody to have me guffawing.
And, yes, it does seem to fit WalnutWandCarrier's requirements for good fiction! | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |

sheep | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-07 08:22 pm (UTC) |
|
| one poster said the narrative should have switced to Neville's POV for a few sentences to explain that he felt a thud on his head
Some one has been reading too much bad fic. | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |

mcity | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-07 08:51 pm (UTC) |
|
| | I've said it before and I'll say it again; James Patterson is the only one who gets to switch PoVs so often, and even he sometimes does it too much. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
| ~*~*~*~*~*~*~NEVVILE'S POV~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* (a/n: brackets are thoughts ok!)
Nevvile sed OW! (what just hit me in the head ouch! Omg it hurts)
OMG IT'S BUM BUM BUM THE SWORD OF GRYFYNDUR!!!!!!!
~*~*~*~END OF CHAPPIE~*~*~*~*~*
(a/n cliffie! what will happen next, r&r to find out! no reviews no chappie!)
I can totally see that in the HP books. Can't you?
| | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |

sheep | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-09 07:36 pm (UTC) |
|
| | I consider myself a fairly hardcore JKR and HP fan, and I would have loved to have known what was going with the alter trio while the primary trio were out camping (lord knows it sounded far more interesting), but if anything resembling this comment ended up in the books, I would be yelling with displeasure as loud as the harmonians at the height of their bashittery. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |

mcity | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-07 08:33 pm (UTC) |
|
| | She has a point.The only options were a)die, or b)further jeopardize the lives of his friends and loved ones and dozens of innocents and try to slip off in the confusion. As far as Harry's was concerned, there was no choice whatsoever. | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| | Just because Harry doesn't emo kid doesn't mean he has no personality. Holy hell, people. :| | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |

lakme | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-07 10:13 pm (UTC) |
|
| | I was following that thread but around page 14 or so I realized "... I JUST DON'T CARE ANYMORE!" They're saying the same things over and over again. :( | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| (Anonymous) | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-08 01:10 am (UTC) |
|
| Redundant repetition is redundant. Seriously, that first statement broke my brain. Do people read these things before posting? | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |

ikuko | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-08 01:58 am (UTC) |
|
| "The thing about Harry's walk into the Forest, is that he hasn't chosen it himself to do that, at no point whatsoever.
It does not compute. Didn't Harry fight of the temptation to be prevented to go at several occasions? And CHOSE to stick with his duty? Or are these pages missing from s/h/it's books? | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| | Oh good ... so I didn't just imagine him walking past various people and kind of wishing that they'd notice and stop him. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |

ikuko | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-08 04:50 am (UTC) |
|
| | You must be a mind reader to figure out what I meant after I mangled the sentence so badly. Not to self: read what you just over-edited before posting. Yes, I fail. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
| He just jumped into being having no interest in life whatsoever (to exagerate a bit , but it's basically that), seeing as he's already basically like that by the end of book one (never ever having personally been interested in the slightest in the Stone at all - thus it is not heroic for him to not want it for him), and never has a serious and difficult and long inner struggle to become a true anti-hero in the end, who, out of hard development and true inner choice (a choice can only take place where there have been alternatives, btw, which isn't the case in Harry's personality at all), would be able to let lose of everything and face death. If he is already like that from the beginning, ok fine, but then what he does is not heroic because then it is utterly normal for him, like eating breakfast is for others. (I actually like to be provokative - but it's exactly like that, actually - eating breakfast would be an achievement for somebody who's been suffering from anorexia and finally manages to eat again, for example, but not if the person is already perfectly able to eat breakfast every day.) His going to his own death isn't a surprise at all, it is clear from book one on that such enormous character traits are already in him from that early on, which is simply impossible, unhuman, personality-less, empty. "
What in God's name, pen name, and sock puppet is this?
| | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| What in God's name, pen name, and sock puppet is this?
This is what is known in Milwaukee as a "Dumbass"; see the First 3 seasons of That 70's Show for further case study by one Red Foreman... | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |

lakme | | Link: | (Link) | | Time: | 2009-05-08 08:27 pm (UTC) |
|
| According to Wiki, Point Place is a fictional suburb of Green Bay, not Milwaukee :D
Which just raises questions for people who live near Green Bay such as myself O_o | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
| I have a good friend who occasionally says, "Such-is-such was so dumb it made my teeth hurt." I never really got that little phrase. I've seen/heard/read some mighty dumb things in my life, but never anything that was so staggeringly stupid that I would describe it as making my teeth hurt.
Until I read that thread at Leaky. And now I get it. | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| The Sorting Hat is a series of tubes. When a worthy Gryffindor in true need sticks their arm in the hat, the tubes reroute themselves to connect to where the sword is.
The problem is that sometimes the tubes become clogged with 93% porn. Which I'm guessing is what it has to do with Harmony, cause otherwise, I got nothing. | | (Reply to this) (Thread) |
| Which I'm guessing is what it has to do with Harmony, cause otherwise, I got nothing.
They were trying to argue that they didn't like DH because it ws bad, not because Harry and Hermione didn't shag in a tent so they were throwing out "plot holes" and inconsistencies only to completely ignor reasonable, text-based explanations. This was just the icing on that cake.
The Sorting Hat is a series of tubes.
So it's like the Internet that way. | | (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread) |
![[icon]](http://www.journalfen.net/userpic/67365/9138) |
The HMS STFU - OK, this is just stupid
|
|