[icon] The HMS STFU - More Snapefen wank with a side of racefail
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:User Info.
View:Website (JF-less sailor? Suggest a topic here!).

Subject:More Snapefen wank with a side of racefail
Time:11:05 pm
Snapedom is repeating themselves again.

oryx_lecroyx
makes a post about JKR's double standards.


My personal favorite from marionros/smallpotato at the start of the thread:
"'s Excuse me? Who says that teen Severus calls all Muggle-borns but Lily 'Mudblood'?

I read Lily's claim to be 'don't You People (aka 'all Slytherins') call my people 'mudbloods'", because Teen Lily sounds pretty much brainwashed into the Gryffindor mindset at that point, a mindset where she won't listen to a word her supposed 'best friend' says because he's a Slytherin and all Slytherins are untrustworthy, slimy, cunning, racist, blah, blah, blah.

I thought that pretty ironic, since all the Gryffindors we meet are pretty racist towards Slytherins. The moment Harry looks for the fist time at the Slytherin table during the Sorting he concludes, knowing Slytherins only from hearsay, that yes, they *do* look rather ugly and evil. That's how racism *works*. To have preconceived notion about a small group of people outside your incrowd and then to adjust your perceptions until they resemble your prejudices. There was a time when I thought Rowling might be doing something very clever (be it in a clumsy way) by feeding her readers all kinds of prejudices about Slytherins, have her readers cheer characters on as they stomped on Slytherins (since they were going to become evil anyway and as such deserved to be punished pre-emptively) and let her readers get into the racist mindset of dehuminizing a group of people simply for the colour of their school tie. Imagine my utter horror when it turned out that the woman was serious about the whole 'bad blood' thing?

To Rowling it *doesn't matter* wether Teen Severus called other muggleborns 'mudbloods' or not. Teen Severus is a Slytherin and in her tiny mind All Slytherins Are Like That Which Is Why We Are Permitted To Hate Them On Sight And Torture, Maim, Harass And Kill Them With Impunity.

Since my mind doesn't work that way, I will stay with my original interpretation, which is based on the characters of Severus and Lily as they are written in canon (Sev worshipping Lily and Lily wanting to get rid the Slytherin boy who is cramping her style).
"


hwyla:
"I also read it to mean Sev (singular) - however, reading it as such implies that Lily remained friends with him even tho' he was using that term - without ever threatening that he must stop. It implies that she only has a problem with it when it refers to her.

I like the idea that she's referring to the Slytherins in general for two reasons. 1) It means Sev may not have been calling other muggleborns Mudbloods and 2) It means Lily wasn't being such a little hypocrit if she hadn't called him on it before.

I think I'll need to find that bit and reread. Anyone have a handy quote?"


marieh_nymma:
"hello, I'm new here, and this my first post- I have an example of a double standard that had been bothering me since DH came out: Apparently we readers are meant to see Severus's racial slur "Mudblood" as unforgivable, but while Ron Weasley calls Remus "Werewolf"(in PoA), which is just as racist as the use of "Mudblood", it's forgivable, understandable, and not a big deal.

I'm sorry, JKR, but...WTF?! Why should it be considered to be "the absolute evil" for Severus to call Lily a Mudblood while we can overlook Ron's own's racist comment? Secondly: WHY should we see Severus's accidental slip as a proof that He Is Without Doubt A Mudblood Hater a.k.a. racist, just based one ONE SINGLE INCIDENT while we aren't meant to consider Ron a Werewolf Hater, thus, a racist based on also one single incident?!"


terri_testing:
It's kind of like the Barty Crouch Jr./Moody impersonation. An insane, committed-to-revenge, torture loving PARRICIDE (one of only two DE's shown in canon to be devoted to the Dark Lord) can successfully impersonate a retired Auror for eight months with no one noticing any lapses? Then the two personalities must be basically alike. Torturing a fourteen-year-old is not unexpected behavior from Alastor Moody. I.E. the very WORST of the DE's is NORMAL for an Auror. (OKay, not normal, but within acceptable parameters--people think Mad-Eye paranoid, not evil.)

Which is an interesting other take on double standards, actually: look at Barty's actions--torturing the student son of an unpunished DE, cheating in the Triwizard, demonstrating the worst dark spells to impressionable kids--from the point of view that Barty's a deranged DE, and it looks rather different from when we thought he was Dumbledore's good if grim friend Moody."


hwyla:
"I suppose one can also compare Harry's Crucio with the one Draco cast at him in the fight in the restroom? Altho' some would say the difference was that Harry used it to 'protect' Minerva (whether she needed it or not) and Draco to attack our hero. We know Ginny approved of Harry's response in SectumSempra. Anyone think she would have approved of the same curse if the DE had used it on Harry to protect himself?"

Seravina:
"I was very disappointed of the moral in the books. All the Slytherins are sooo bad and the Gryffindors are sooo good. And when they do wrong, from calling a teacher "greasy git" to breaking a lot of school rules they get away with it. Or worse, they are rewarded for it. The best example is at the end of PS, when Dumbledore rewards Harry & Co. such a horrendous amount of points that they shoot from the last rank of the House Cup to be the winner. This must bee an affront not only for the Slytherins but for every other house.

But the favoritism did not start with Harry. Remember the Shrieking Shack incident.

As a former teacher JKR should know what behaviour like that can do. At least she describes the consequences correct. Why should the Slytherins stay at the final battle and fight for a school/world that does not accept them?"



I gotta hand it shyfoxling for trying to bring some level of sense to these people.
comments: Poke a delusional shipper Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry


[info]quantumreality
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 05:23 am (UTC)
Since my mind doesn't work that way

Since my mind doesn't work that way


Since my mind doesn't work that way


Good work, marionros. I actually sporfled.

I gotta say, marionros sure makes revealing comments sometimes amid the Special Capitalization and the sheer batshit hissing and ranting that passes for intelligent commentary from her. Check this out:

"'s Excuse me? Who says that teen Severus calls all Muggle-borns but Lily 'Mudblood'?"

Who says? Who says?!? WHAT THE FLYING SEAFARING FUCK LADY? Can you not read the book for yourself?

Basic literary analysis is that you can usually take a character's words as true unless specifically contradicted. So Lily stating that "you call everyone of my birth Mudblood" can be taken as generally true even if marionros might nitpick some fantasized incident as false.

If I keep trying to spork what she says I'm going to end up degenerating into a big FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU MARIONROS rant.

I'll tackle the others later.
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]quantumreality
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 05:31 am (UTC)
Lily’s smile was widest of all. She pushed her long hair back as she drew closer to him, and her green eyes, so like his, searched his face hungrily, as though she would never be able to look at him enough.

But yeah, the double standard really burns. The only way I can read it as NOT a double standard is also icky: in line with a somewhat consistent view in the books of masculine emotion openly expressed being considered weak (thus damning Severus), women are allowed to be 'hungry' but men must be 'above' that 'weakness.'


Oh fuck you, [info]00sevvie!

Harry Potter is her orphaned son. He has the right to want to see his mother and she no doubt wants to see the young man he's grown up into.

But hey, I forget. Snape the Nice Guy is supposed to get the girl without considering the implications thereof.
(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]cheryl_bites
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 08:48 am (UTC)
Her mind doesn't work at all, so she's half right. ;)
(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]sailorlum
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 05:57 am (UTC)
Marionros... AHHHH! >_< House prejudice is NOT comparable to racism! People aren’t born into their House - they get a choice what House they go in! And the wizarding world does not define the Houses as separate races, like they do with the “wizard race” versus “the Muggle race”. Once outside of Hogwarts, what House you belonged to becomes much less important. The Houses are far more like sports teams or cliques. Not that House prejudice can’t turn nasty, but it’s just not comparable racism. (And if you would compare House prejudice to racism, then how the hell do you not see how blood prejudice is racism! WTF, Snapefen!?)

This is also a prime example of almost all the Spapefen Laws of Alternate Interpretive Nonsense.

Hwyla
...I like the idea that she's referring to the Slytherins in general for two reasons. 1) It means Sev may not have been calling other muggleborns Mudbloods and 2) It means Lily wasn't being such a little hypocrit if she hadn't called him on it before.


All this unwarranted blame for Lily, and no blame for Snape. -_-

And why do they assume that Snape was throwing the word Mudblood around right in front of Lily, and she was fine with it? Lily may be guilty of woobiefying Snape a bit (my personal theory) but canon indicates that she cared about more than just herself. (She joined the Order and she sacrificed her life for Harry’s.) Maybe she only heard about him saying it second-hand or overheard it and refused to believe it until he called her a Mudblood? Or maybe she had spoken with him about his use of the slur before, and she kept hoping that she could convince him to stop going down a bad road. I think those are far more likely than, “Lily didn’t care until it was her”.

marieh-nymma
I'm sorry, JKR, but...WTF?! Why should it be considered to be "the absolute evil" for Severus to call Lily a Mudblood while we can overlook Ron's own's racist comment?...


They do not seem to understand context or matters of degree. Ron never once thinks of joining a violent anti-werewolf gang and Ron’s prejudice against werewolves is presented as a flaw.

more from marieh-nymma
...But when it comes to Sev, those same people become merciless(much like Lily) and overlook the fact that 1) Severus was in an extreme case of humiliation/sexual assault 2)Lily smiled for a bit. Why can't people see their own hypocrisy? Apparently, it's OK for Ron to lash out, but not for Severus.

Lily didn’t even smile! Her mouth twitched for an instant and I don’t think Snape even saw that, as his robes were over his freaking head at the time! >_< Stop harping on the little twitch that Snape probably didn’t even see, Snapefen. Also, while James and Sirius were ragging on Snape horribly in that scene and their actions were deplorable, that doesn’t excuse Snape throwing a nasty racial slur at his best friend who was only trying to help him.

duj
I find that the HPverse encourages prejudicial thinking all the way from double standards through dehumanisation to demonisation. The acceptable objects of prejudice include Slytherins, pureblood, the rich, politicians, journalists, giants, goblins, werewolves, etc...

Notice who tops duj’s list. *sigh* Oh, cry me a river for those poor privileged pure-bloods, Slytherins, rich folk, powerful politicians, and journalists. Boo. Hoo. Oh, they are so oppressed. *rolls eyes*

more from marieh-nymma
...Snape-haters in denial just can't get used to that fact, so they twist every loving act from Severus into evil ones….

…Sev the loyal friend(to both Lily and Slytherin ones) who didn't abandoned his buddies just because they didn't share the same views becomes Sev who betrayed Lily by association,and chose the Death Eaters over her even though she never asked him to choose.

Sev who lashed out in a moment of humiliation with the result of him saying Mudblood became Sev the racist who betrayed Lily. Sev who was frantic with worry, wanting desperately to be forgiven by Lily and who apologized...


D: D: D:

Seriously, what is wrong with Snape fandom? Why does it seem to attract such fail? T_T
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]quantumreality
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 06:30 am (UTC)
Snape-haters in denial just can't get used to that fact, so they twist every loving act from Severus into evil ones


Bwahahahahah! *SPORFLE*

Srs, WTF? We're not the ones taking every incident in canon and warping it to try and fit a very selective viewpoint on Sev the Woobie.

Loyalty to Death Eaters and Voldemort is not exactly the kind of shining character reference that marieh-nymma seems to think it is.
(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]drakyndra
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 07:28 am (UTC)
The Houses are far more like sports teams or cliques.

That's actually a pretty good analogy; there might be stereotypes and name-calling, after a game you might get some drunk people getting into bar-fights, but for most adults what "team" you are with is irrelevant to daily life.

Incidentally, I strongly suspect that anyone who compares house prejudice to racism never actually went to a school that had houses or inter-house competitions. It is nothing like racism.
(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]chalts
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-08 04:13 am (UTC)
The acceptable objects of prejudice include... pureblood
The Weasleys are purebloods
the rich
Yeah, the Malfoy's are rich. You know who's also rich? THE FRIGGIN' PROTAGONIST
politicians
You know who's a politician? Dumbledore
journalists
Yes because Rita Skeeter constitutes an oppressed minority
giants
Even if this were true GIANT'S DON'T EXIST
goblins
Damn Rowling and her bigotry!
werewolves
Because werewolf prejudice being misguided is completely not one of the main points of book three.
(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]ikabod
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-08 10:50 pm (UTC)
Snape-haters in denial just can't get used to that fact, so they twist every loving act from Severus into evil ones….

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]fionnabhair
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-08 11:14 pm (UTC)
You know what I don't get? Why is that Snapefen never get that the reason that particular memory is Snape's worst one has nothing to do with James and Sirius?

It's his worst memory because in that moment he destroyed was probably the single best relationship of his life, and he was never able to forgive himself for it. Not because James and Sirius were dicks (which they were, I don't dispute that, at all).
(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(Anonymous)
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 05:59 am (UTC)
The "zomg all Slytherins are portrayed as bad" really grates on my nerves, because there are good reasons for that. I think I’ve read somewhere that JKR regrets not having had the opportunity in the books to show off more clearly “good” Slytherins, but I know for a fact that she’s explained that even “good” Slytherin-personality types are not necessarily pleasant: Their whole deal is that they’re cunning and often quite self-serving. That’s canon. And while those are often very useful traits to have, it’s not likely that everyone will find people possessing these traits particularly pleasant. They’re not your Gryffindors or Hufflepuffs, on the front lines fighting for basically Truth, Justice, and the American British way. They do better behind the scenes, as sneaky spies.

It’s a real shame there wasn’t, like, a subplot involving a Slytherin or Slytherin-type actively using those sneaky espionage tendencies to fight for the side of good; it’d be great for a really flawed, even downright nasty and unpleasant character to play a huge, instrumental behind-the-scenes role in ending the war by generally using his nasty unpleasantness and Slytherin-y traits to his advantage and to cover his true motivations. It’s too bad JKR didn’t write any characters like that. OH WAIT.
(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]maegwin_of_hern
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 06:45 am (UTC)
Torturing a fourteen-year-old is not unexpected behavior from Alastor Moody. I.E. the very WORST of the DE's is NORMAL for an Auror.

This person clearly skipped the part where McGonnagal tells Moody off for punishing Draco in that way, i.e. she clearly states that this kind of behavior is NOT normal.

BTW, it's patricide, not parricide. If you want to stress a particular word by putting it IN CAPS, at least write it correctly.
(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]kartikeya
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 06:51 am (UTC)
I thought that pretty ironic, since all the Gryffindors we meet are pretty racist towards Slytherins.

For people constantly claiming to be oh-so-intellectual, Snapefen sure don't know what words mean.
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]cheryl_bites
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 09:04 am (UTC)
*Is terribly proud of Esmestrella*

There's no way I can tackle everything that's going on here, so I'll pick out the statement that Lily is a hypocrite because she stuck with Snape when he was calling everyone but her a Mudblood. That's presumably because she was trying to save him from himself; exactly the thing that the crazy misogynist Snapefen viewed as her moral duty. She only gave up on him when she believed that saving him was no longer possible. Not my idea of a hypocrite.
(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]julianrain
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 09:19 am (UTC)
That's Harry looking hungrily at his mother, not the other way around. But yes - why is Harry allowed to be hungry for her, but Severus is not?
What the fuck? Apparently it's a double standard to differentiate between a separated mother and son longing for each other and a nice-guy stalker.
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]indis_earfalas
Subject:Stuff it, I'm bored and have too much time on my hands.
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 09:48 am (UTC)
I read Lily's claim to be 'don't You People (aka 'all Slytherins') call my people 'mudbloods'", because Teen Lily sounds pretty much brainwashed into the Gryffindor mindset at that point, a mindset where she won't listen to a word her supposed 'best friend' says because he's a Slytherin and all Slytherins are untrustworthy, slimy, cunning, racist, blah, blah, blah.

Yeah, bollocks. She's talking about Sevvie's particular group of "friends". The ones she's already told him she finds creepy and not even remotely amusing - it's not like this was a new issue with them.


I thought that pretty ironic, since all the Gryffindors we meet are pretty racist towards Slytherins.

Racist? No, I don't think so. They might unfairly think that the lot of them are a bunch of racist arse-holes, but you don't see anyone walking around going "Disgusting Pure-bloods!"


(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]miss_eponine
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 11:00 am (UTC)
There is so much crazy here, I don't really know what to say. Except, now I want to know what the politically correct term for werewolf is.
(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]sandyclaws68
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 12:52 pm (UTC)
If I didn't have a migraine I'd be all over this steaming pile of shite, but all I've got for right now is:

1)They think that the "Snape haters" are the hypocrites and the ones in denial?

and

2)GINNY DID NOT APPROVE OF HARRY USING SECTUMSEMPRA. Being glad that a friend had some effective way of defending himself from an UNFORGIVABLE =/= approval.

Sorry for the CAPSLOCK (and boy did that shouting make my headache worse), but this same issue is always coming up amongst Ginny haters, and after five freakin' years (since HBP) you'd think it had sunk in. Alas, no.
(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous)


[info]vorpal_blade
Subject:Snapefen: Missing all the points since 1997
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 01:09 pm (UTC)
I admit, I'm finding that Married with Children icon on the post pretty funny. But then I can laugh at my own shipping preferences. SNAPEFEN YOU HAVE NO SENSE OF HUMOR ABOUT YOURSELVES.

Anyway, I think another big parallel that they're missing in all of this is the similarity between the Lily/Severus friendship and the Albus/Gellert friendship. Once we know about Dumbledore and Grindelwald being youthful friends before Dumbledore stopped Grindelwald it's easy to draw a line from that to Neville being rewarded for standing up to his friends in the first book, but then there's also Lily and Severus. She was friends with him before they even came to Hogwarts, and stuck by him for years despite many of her friends questioning this (probably at first just because he was a Slytherin and because of anti-Slytherin bias, but probably eventually because of Snape hanging out with DE-wannabes). She had to part ways with her friend too, and stood up to him, and told him the consequences of his continuing on the path he was on. It's also interesting that, in the end, both Grindelwald and Snape stand up to Voldemort and die at his hand (although with Snape it was indirect, through Nagini).

Of course, they wouldn't think a Lily-Dumbledore parallel was a good one because they read the Bizarro! versions of the books and think Dumbledore is evil-incarnate...
(Reply to this) (Thread)

marionros stole.... - (Anonymous)


[info]mcity
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 06:32 pm (UTC)
I like how they assume that everything a Gryffindor did was meant to be right and everything a Slytherin did was meant to be wrong.

>all the Gryffindors we meet are pretty racist towards Slytherins

...Doesn't Racism generally require prejudice toward a race? You keep using that word, etc.

>To Rowling it *doesn't matter* wether Teen Severus called other muggleborns 'mudbloods' or not.

He called his *best friend* one. Assuming he was calling other people it is a reasonable assumption. Operative word; "reasonable". Look it up.

>Teen Severus is a Slytherin and in her tiny mind

a)I've had enough of your snide insinuations. 2)No one who can juggle that many Chekhov's Guns has a 'tiny mind'.

> Apparently we readers are meant to see Severus's racial slur "Mudblood" as unforgivable, but while Ron Weasley calls Remus "Werewolf"(in PoA), which is just as racist as the use of "Mudblood",

HAHAHAHAH no.

>[Crouch/Moody impersonation]

It's amazing what sufficiently motivated crazy people can do. For example; wank about a book for three years after it's been published.

>. I.E. the very WORST of the DE's is NORMAL for an Auror.

The DEs kill, mind rape, and probably do worse to people, and you think that torture is the worst they get up to?
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]vorpal_blade
Subject:Where do I send the bill for my broken brain? Part I
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 06:44 pm (UTC)
Things about this that broke my brain:

Since my mind doesn't work that way, I will stay with my original interpretation, which is based on the characters of Severus and Lily as they are written in canon (Sev worshipping Lily and Lily wanting to get rid the Slytherin boy who is cramping her style)."

What book did she read this in? Not the same ones I read. "Trying to get her killed" is hardly the same thing as "cramping her style". (Is this the time to say, "Oh, is that what the kids are calling it these days?" No?)

I like the idea that she's referring to the Slytherins in general for two reasons. 1) It means Sev may not have been calling other muggleborns Mudbloods and 2) It means Lily wasn't being such a little hypocrit if she hadn't called him on it before.

You mean you like the idea that for once you actually got what JKR was saying? I like that idea too--it makes a person stand out amongst the Slytherfen.

Think about it--if Snape had been using that term at all within Lily's hearing she'd have parted ways with him a lot sooner. But you know what? I'd be almost as upset about a friend of mine who was hanging around with other people using racist terms and DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING TO THESE PEOPLE ABOUT THEIR LANGUAGE as that friend using language of that sort himself. I say almost because it's still worse to do it yourself, but silence can imply agreement (or imply cowardice, take your pick). Since Lily may have had cause to know that Snape wasn't a coward (technically he was right to tell Harry not to call him that) she may have assumed agreement, which is actually worse than not having the nerve to stand up to your friends when they're being racist assholes.

but while Ron Weasley calls Remus "Werewolf"

How is the word "werewolf" racist? I must have missed that memo. It's what a person in Remus's situation IS. What was he supposed to say, "Lycanthrope"? "Undead-Briton"? "Differently-tooth-and-clawed"? In some werewolf liturature there may be derogatory terms for werewolves, but we haven't been given one in the Potterverse. Wanting to turn what Ron said into an epithet on the same level as "Mudblood" is ridiculous.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]vorpal_blade
Subject:Where do I send the bill for my broken brain? Part II
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 06:47 pm (UTC)
An insane, committed-to-revenge, torture loving PARRICIDE (one of only two DE's shown in canon to be devoted to the Dark Lord) can successfully impersonate a retired Auror for eight months with no one noticing any lapses? Then the two personalities must be basically alike. Torturing a fourteen-year-old is not unexpected behavior from Alastor Moody. I.E. the very WORST of the DE's is NORMAL for an Auror.

If this weren't unexpected behavior I don't think McGonagall would have been as upset with him. And she was defending a Slytherin, too! (Why does no one else ever notice this? A GRYFFINDOR WAS DEFENDING A SLYTHERIN.) There were multiple reasons that Crouch was able to successfully impersonate Moody:

1. He was the son of the head of Magical Law Enforcement and probably knew Moody personally through his dad, for years, so he was no doubt able to draw on that information to successfully play his role.

2. No one EXPECTED Moody to be other than who he said he was, just as no one EXPECTED Ron's rat to be Peter Pettigrew.

3. Therefore any behavioral quirks that were anomalous to what people previously knew of Moody's personality were things that those who knew him were liable to put down to age and his reputation for increasing paranoia--they would find ways to explain these things that were consistent with an Occam's Razor explanation, in other words, the least complicated one possible, rather than something as out-there as an impostor taking his place.

There's absolutely no reason to believe that Moody and Crouch have basically the same personality; Crouch was said to have had 12 OWLs (by his proud father); he was obviously smart and performed well in school, just like young Tom Riddle. He probably could have BEEN an Auror if he'd gone through the training, so that might be one thing he did have in common with Moody--a similar aptitude for intrigue, attention to detail and mind-bending cleverness. OTOH, he would have had this in common with ALL Aurors. But those are attributes, not personality traits. Moody was worth twenty of Barty Crouch, Junior--and Senior, too.

Harry used it to 'protect' Minerva

Harry didn't just use the Cruciatus to protect Minerva--he used this on the one guy he knew had been using this spell on students ALL DAMN YEAR and who had been making students use this on EACH OTHER. Neville gave the backstory to this. Harry was cursing him on behalf of every student of Hogwarts who had suffered under the Carrows--THAT'S why he had the power to put behind it. If personal feelings he had toward one person were enough to light a fire under Harry big enough to fuel Crucio he could have cursed Bellatrix after she killed Sirius. This wasn't for him or Minerva--it was for all of the tortured children.

I was very disappointed of the moral in the books. All the Slytherins are sooo bad and the Gryffindors are sooo good.

That's not a moral, brain trust. It's a message. And, BTW, it's not a message sent by these books. Double fail.

Pass the Tylenol...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]agent_hyatt
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 07:38 pm (UTC)
These are the same people who try to argue that anti-muggleborn prejudice isn't racism, aren't they? Please tell me that someone called them out on their blatant double standard for what does and does not deserve the racism comparisons.
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]pantyless_angel
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-07 10:19 pm (UTC)
Snapefen talking about double standards! XD The irony is killing me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Anonymous)
Subject:Kinda off but related to Oryx.
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-08 08:56 pm (UTC)
http://mike-smith.livejournal.com/209245.html - Oryx talks about how James bullied Lily to marry him.
(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]randomneses
Link:(Link)
Time:2010-10-09 06:12 pm (UTC)
I CAN'T EVEN. I JUST CAN'T.
(Reply to this) (Thread)

[icon] The HMS STFU - More Snapefen wank with a side of racefail
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:User Info.
View:Website (JF-less sailor? Suggest a topic here!).