|
|
sandglass (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} sandglass) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} unfunny_fandom, |
PlannedChaos: Isn't it fundamentally dishonest, and therefore immoral, to debate under an assumed name?
Scott: Yes. On the scale of immoral behavior, where genocide is at the top, and wearing Spanx is near the bottom, posting comments under an alias to clear up harmful misconceptions is about one level worse than Spanx.
PlannedChaos: Are you saying the ends justify the means?
Scott: Yes, sometimes. The types of people who act solely on principle are the ones who burn Korans and wonder why something went wrong.
I...what? It's okay to sockpuppet because people wear constricting underwear and burn Korans?
Scott: Yes. On the scale of immoral behavior, where genocide is at the top, and wearing Spanx is near the bottom, posting comments under an alias to clear up harmful misconceptions is about one level worse than Spanx.
PlannedChaos: Are you saying the ends justify the means?
Scott: Yes, sometimes. The types of people who act solely on principle are the ones who burn Korans and wonder why something went wrong.
I...what? It's okay to sockpuppet because people wear constricting underwear and burn Korans?
Post a comment in response:
