Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



dottiness ([info]dottiness) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2011-04-19 22:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Right, so, Ginia Bellafante did a terrible, sexist, uninformed review of HBO's adaptation of Game of Thrones including statements about how it was boy fiction, the sex and intrigue was only in there as a bone thrown to women viewers, and she'd never met a woman who would rather read "The Hobbit" than a piece of literary fiction.

Apparently she got hundreds of angry emails, hundreds of angry tweets, and "three supportive notes from people she is personally considering adopting." So what lesson does she take from all of this?

"Pull up a throne and let's talk" includes such well-written responses as this:

"As I wrote in the review, I realize that there are women who love fantasy, but I don’t know any and that is the truth: I don’t know any."

"But they have also sent long and vitriolic attacks claiming that, in my negativity, I made it clear that I had no idea what I was talking about. I appreciate the economy of those readers who began and ended their comments: “You are a complete idiot.” Phrases like that constituted a whole subgenre of the online response."


Lots of comments on both sides of the issue, but, unsurprisingly, a tremendously large number calling her out on her excuse for saying no woman would ever want to read fantasy.

I didn't know where this should go, so I stuck with the old "if you aren't sure, put it in UFB!" rule. The last post about this was in [info]fandom_lounge, but I think her continuing to dig the hole deeper probably belongs elsewhere.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]mirhanda
2011-04-20 08:00 pm UTC (link)
*sputter*

I am also a woman over the age of 25 (WAY over) and the Guards subseries is absolutely my favorite. I boggle that people think that way!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]littleshebear
2011-04-20 08:17 pm UTC (link)
My middle-aged uncle recommended Terry Pratchett to me (so that's another strike against teenage boys) and I found it difficult to get into for the longest time. It was Guards, Guards! that made me fall in love with Discworld. I'm now a 30 year old woman and I still prefer the Watch books over the others.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]athersgeo
2011-04-20 09:02 pm UTC (link)
Ditto, ditto and ditto (apart from the middle-aged uncle; I was recommended Pterry by a girl who was [is, presumably!] a good three years younger than me). She started me off with The Hogfather which I STRUGGLED with and then she handed me Feet of Clay and I read it inside three hours.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2011-04-21 01:28 am UTC (link)
Guards, Guards! was the first one I read and still a huge favorite.

I'm behind in my Pratchett reading though. Must remedy that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kumquat_of_doom
2011-04-23 12:52 am UTC (link)
I am twenty-two, but I'm also the girliest girl to ever girl ... and I'm writing my dissertation on the Guards subseries of Discworld books.

So that must be, what, at least half a dozen reasons why I don't exist, now...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map