Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



dottiness ([info]dottiness) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2011-04-19 22:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Right, so, Ginia Bellafante did a terrible, sexist, uninformed review of HBO's adaptation of Game of Thrones including statements about how it was boy fiction, the sex and intrigue was only in there as a bone thrown to women viewers, and she'd never met a woman who would rather read "The Hobbit" than a piece of literary fiction.

Apparently she got hundreds of angry emails, hundreds of angry tweets, and "three supportive notes from people she is personally considering adopting." So what lesson does she take from all of this?

"Pull up a throne and let's talk" includes such well-written responses as this:

"As I wrote in the review, I realize that there are women who love fantasy, but I don’t know any and that is the truth: I don’t know any."

"But they have also sent long and vitriolic attacks claiming that, in my negativity, I made it clear that I had no idea what I was talking about. I appreciate the economy of those readers who began and ended their comments: “You are a complete idiot.” Phrases like that constituted a whole subgenre of the online response."


Lots of comments on both sides of the issue, but, unsurprisingly, a tremendously large number calling her out on her excuse for saying no woman would ever want to read fantasy.

I didn't know where this should go, so I stuck with the old "if you aren't sure, put it in UFB!" rule. The last post about this was in [info]fandom_lounge, but I think her continuing to dig the hole deeper probably belongs elsewhere.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]evilsqueakers
2011-04-21 04:58 am UTC (link)
Read for yourself, but beware of some truly moronic comments in the truest sense. [WARNING: Rape fantasy, rape culture, dubious consent and possible triggers abound.]



It's like candy no one wants. Except maybe Bella Swann.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]blackflag
2011-04-21 05:26 am UTC (link)
Wow. (Again.) That's... that's something, all right. Yikes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]evilsqueakers
2011-04-21 07:45 am UTC (link)
You can see why I had to literally bite my tongue. I almost posted like 3 times but decided that would be of the bad. (I especially love the "prove it!" on an opinion piece.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]blackflag
2011-04-21 07:51 am UTC (link)
Yeah really! I'm boggled.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]evilsqueakers
2011-04-21 07:54 am UTC (link)
It reminds me so much of a "Accept my views! Now! Do it!" It's made me kind of...lose faith in the blog, for the most part. Because wow. That literally churned my stomach. Isobel Carr had some good arguments and in return all I heard was "bawwwww."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]blackflag
2011-04-21 08:04 am UTC (link)
It is a bit. And a lot of not understanding other povs.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]evilsqueakers
2011-04-21 08:07 am UTC (link)
There's also the fact it's all about "Scientific" proof versus "My opinion matters more!" that kind of drowns out everything. I'm uninspired after she posted an email she received in order to prove that she has supporters.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]blackflag
2011-04-21 08:32 am UTC (link)
So... the lurkers support her in email?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]evilsqueakers
2011-04-21 08:34 am UTC (link)
Quite literally it seems.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map