Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



sandglass ([info]sandglass) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
I'm sorry, the entire fucking internet doesn't exist to be a cushion to those who are grieving.

Yes, it's not the point of the Internet, but that doesn't give him free reign to say whatever whenever. He too is responsible for his actions, and part of that is being called out when it's appropriate. Which, given his blog post, he recognizes.

Don't get me wrong, if he'd waited until the facts were verified (as he later said he should have) or been a bit kinder (I wouldn't complain about "Friends don't let friends..."), I wouldn't care. But if the point is that the Internet doesn't exist for coddling, then...why shouldn't I call him out on insensitivity?

I realize I'm being overly kind to Dunn--what he did was horrific and unpardonable. But at the same time, the respect for the dead is only partially for their memory, it's also part for the people mourning him. I don't think it's unfair to call for a public figure to err on the side of kindness, especially immediately after someone's death.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map