Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



well, at least she's a good-looking spy ([info]blue_penguin) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2011-09-24 16:54:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"Gay comics characters don't look gay enough!"
This has been making the fandom rounds, but I haven't seen it here yet, so here goes:

Brett Booth and Scott Lobdell, the team behind the relaunch of Teen Titans, have decided to add a new gay character to the team. Cool, right?

Unfortunately, Booth's comments on the reasoning behind this decision are somewhat less cool. A few choice quotes:

I’ve seen all the other gay superheroes out there, Ok maybe not all. They look just like regular heterosexuals, they act like regular heterosexuals, they just happen to have sex with people of their own gender, under the covers and in the dark. Sure you might get a kiss on a page, but that’s all (an no we won’t be doing any sex scenes in TT, get your minds OUT of the gutters

We wanted to show an interesting character who’s homosexuality is part of him, not something that’s hidden.


[...]

As for the children.. Most simply don’t know or don’t care. It’s not like Migg’s is going to be doing a one man gay pride parade. I don’t think we even mention that he’s gay, you see him, you know it, no need to harp on about it. He’s just a happy fun loving guy! He won’t be wearing anything that I haven’t seen at Walmart. Well maybe Target;)

Which (a) has the unpleasant implication that gay characters (and indeed actual gay people) are Not Gay Enough unless they fit certain stereotypes and (b) leads to concerns that the character in question may be written as a sort of sexless Gay Best Friend type who you "know" is gay not because he expresses any interest in men, but because he's effeminate. Fun!

This RPG.net thread has a good discussion of it (turning partway into a discussion of comics characters who were conceived as queer vs. ones that were retconned to be, but that's interesting too!); it's also been posted on inclusive_geeks on LJ. (Those are the only places I've seen it, but if anyone has more links, by all means let me know!)


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]the__ivorytower
2011-09-25 06:37 pm UTC (link)
They look just like regular heterosexuals, they act like regular heterosexuals, they just happen to have sex with people of their own gender, under the covers and in the dark.

WELL WHY DO YOU THINK THAT MAY BE?

DO YOU THINK IT MAY POSSIBLY BE BECAUSE GAY PEOPLE ARE LIKE ANYONE ELSE? THAT YOU DO NOT WEAR YOUR SEXUALITY ON YOUR SLEEVE?

Excuse me while I go mutter to myself.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2011-09-25 09:05 pm UTC (link)
While I've probably said all I need to say in the i_g post, I'll add that I take high offense to the idea that those of us who don't ping gaydar at a thousand paces are somehow repressed or hiding ourselves.

Some of us flame. Some of us smoulder. And to be honest, sexuality doesn't matter for either.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2011-10-03 11:42 pm UTC (link)
Where I come from, all the women look like lesbians, because our style of dress is largely determined by our need not to be killed by whatever the weather happens to be at any given moment. Also, there is a Birkenstock outlet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map