Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



tiye ([info]tiye) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2012-01-24 13:23:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Gobsmacked

Multiple interpretations of canon? In MY fandom?
Warnings for homophobia with a side of sexism and probably various other -isms that I'm not entirely sure I have a name for! Also, massive amounts of jaw-droppingly over-the-top condescension.

Alexds1 is a fan of original recipe Sherlock Holmes, which is the only version that matters! Alexds1 has a problem with adaptations of literary works. And people who enjoy those adaptations. And people who view those adaptations as legitimate works in their own right. And people whose interpretations of creative works differ from Alexds1's. But Alexds1 especially has a problem with anyone who dares to speculate about Sherlock Holmes's sexuality, which is spelled out totally unambiguously in the original source material!

It doesn't take long for the pwnage to begin.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]coffeebun
2012-01-25 09:34 am UTC (link)
Oh, that person.

Alexds1 also made a whole tumblr post about DC and how the people who were complaining about Starfire's personality change were a bunch of whiners who should just stop buying comics or just buy the ones they like because gosh guys who cares she's just a fictional character and complaining about it isn't going to change anything because who cares about superheroes anyway! (Oh, just realized that it was in wank report, huh.)

So before he's okay with Starfire going from an actual character to a walking sex doll and now he's upset because people are speculating on Sherlock's sexuality? Wow, cry more.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2012-01-25 10:22 am UTC (link)
ewwwww.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kosaginolegion
2012-01-25 01:15 pm UTC (link)
I was wondering what sort of icing ought to be put on this cake. Now I know. Ironic icing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]full_metal_ox
2012-01-26 11:53 pm UTC (link)
To be served with a spot of that ironic tea of Michael Moorcock's.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]yattara
2012-01-25 02:38 pm UTC (link)
Only because he doesn't want to fap over Holmes, just Kory.

... I am so going to get my ass kicked by her over this, aren't I?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2012-01-25 03:29 pm UTC (link)
I think Kory's got way too many asses to kick at the moment. You're safe unless she decides on some sort of lottery system. Actually, even then, you're probably still safe.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]yattara
2012-01-27 10:35 am UTC (link)
Well, that's a relief. I don't want to face an angry Starfire.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tiye
2012-01-25 05:40 pm UTC (link)
... Wow.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ekaterinv
2012-01-25 11:29 pm UTC (link)
Making women sex objects = peachy keen.

Making him think about men's sexuality = ew gross stop thinking with your vaginas you whores!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map