Current mood:

Gobsmacked

Multiple interpretations of canon? In MY fandom?
Warnings for homophobia with a side of sexism and probably various other -isms that I'm not entirely sure I have a name for! Also, massive amounts of jaw-droppingly over-the-top condescension.

Alexds1 is a fan of original recipe Sherlock Holmes, which is the only version that matters! Alexds1 has a problem with adaptations of literary works. And people who enjoy those adaptations. And people who view those adaptations as legitimate works in their own right. And people whose interpretations of creative works differ from Alexds1's. But Alexds1 especially has a problem with anyone who dares to speculate about Sherlock Holmes's sexuality, which is spelled out totally unambiguously in the original source material!

It doesn't take long for the pwnage to begin.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

sandyclaws68
2012-01-26 02:18 am UTC (link)

You mean they miss it?
Some do, yeah. Usually the ones who like to think of themselves as "pure intellect" and therefore make everything about Holmes into something to be admired. They totally disregard the things that should be at the least regarded with a sideways hairy-eyeball glance.

For my part I think the best for portraying that tragic side of Holmes was Brett.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	tehrin 2012-01-26 05:28 am UTC (link)
	It's like they think that by proving how right they are, they're smarter than the rabble and more like Holmes than everyone else. (Reply to this)(Parent)

cmdr_zoom
2012-01-26 07:39 pm UTC (link)

In my personal experience, those who aspire to/imagine themselves as "pure intellect" don't know how to deal with their emotions and need for social contact, have bad experiences as a result, and so try to pretend those things don't exist... which works about as well, long-term, as throwing a tarp over the elephant in the living room.

(I got better. Then I found new things to be stupid about.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -