Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



chikane ([info]chikane) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
I'm just wondering why nobody is going after the Simpsons for the clearly dis/differently-abled Ralph Wiggum

How many people in this fight are personally dis/differently-abled or personally have dis/differently-abled relatives who expressed a negative opinion of the character's original nature/look versus being white hats out to save people who, as many seem to have posted, don't feel they need or want saving of this kind?

There should be a law that during any discussion about any prejudice, someone who didn't check the actual situation will barge in with these two arguments. Because it always happens.

And they are nearly always wrong. Why can't we have people randomly barging into such discussions saying

"How many people in this fight secretly are Illuminati!? Most of them must be Illuminati! I know it!"

It'd be as nonsensical, but at least it'd be funny.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map