Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Ha-chan ([info]agent_hyatt) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2012-02-26 16:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Lessons from bronies: Removing ableist stereotypes is intolerant!
Remember the backlash when an episode of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic portrayed fan-favorite Ditzy/"Derpy" as "humorously" mentally challenged? Well, the concerns were heard, and the voice changed!

Aaaaand now some bronies are crying "ruined FOREVER!". To the tune of "not liking our insensitivity is intolerant!"

So, everyone who can now watch the clip without cringeing, you're harshing someone's squee, and that's terrible.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]shadwing
2012-02-28 05:40 pm UTC (link)
I think I can answer your questions about Simpsons vs MLP:FiM

The Simpsons, was never ment to be a 'pure' kids cartoon, it along with other shows FOX premired when it first started were more or less edgy/satire/dark comedy they were crude rude and in your face hit topics that most 'main stream' networks wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole with fear of offending the PC police. The Simpsons never packaged itself as a show for kids and to teach them 'life lessons' ect. In fact the Simpsons started as 'ad bumpers' on the Tracy Ulman Show before they spun off into their own series...a show with a decidely Adult Target Audience.

Compare with MLP:FiM a Cartoon Series airing on a Safe Kid friendly Network, packaged as a good wholesome show about cute ponies haveing adventures and learning lessons. Having a possibly (never stated or confirmed in the show) disabled character, a less perfect and pretty pony messing things up and being scolded by the 'pretty/perfect' ponies and no lesson about how this is not a good thing, can send very uncomfortable message out.

Combine that with a known slur against the disabled, and establishing that as the characters name...and combine that with the fact said name was FAN BASED...started by the Adult segment of the fandom IIRC...and well you can get how people would react badly.

So in short the Simpsons don't get the flack because it's considered Adult Satire rather than Kids Entertainment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bishounenhideto
2012-02-29 06:18 am UTC (link)
Thank you for politely answering my questions. I appreciate it. I'd still like to see things be more even across the board. What Hasbro did in the end was the absolute right thing to do. I'd like to see even "adult shows" be given the same once-over to spend less time trying to get cheap laughs from racial/sexual/younameit stereotypes and actually try simply being originally funny.

As a southerner, I get tired of the "missing teeth, didn't graduate 5th grade, wear only overalls and no shoes, dumb as a rock, inbred hayseed redneck" trope, but not much ever gets done about that. It makes too much money, I guess. Larry the Cable Guy isn't even actually southern, so a northerner slurs southerners and makes big bucks and is hugely popular for doing it. *sighs*

If it takes one genre/fandom at a time to try to deal with using -isms for cheap laughs, then it's good to see Hasbro helping that along for this particular -ism. It's good to see people pull together and make it happen.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map