Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hopsandbarley ([info]hopsandbarley) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2014-07-16 17:50:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Between Dashcon and now this, it's a crappy week to work on Welcome to Night Vale.

(tw: mentions of rape)



Sodomquake is best known to WTNV fans as the co-writer of "Summer Reading Program", the episode that introduced fan-favorite character Tamika Flynn. She is also known among Persona 4 fans as the writer of "Sympathy Crime", a fanfic that features rape. Tumblr user teethforlunch points this out, and is quite critical about Sodomquake being a writer of "underage rape porn".

Then Persona fans who've read the fic speak up, pointing out the fic is victim-focused and doesn't fetishize rape at all

Sodomquake's tumblr is now password protected. Teethforlunch has gutted their blog. (CORRECTION: Tumblr support actually did their job, teethforlunch's account was deleted, and a friend of sodomquake's has taken the URL to prevent them from getting it back) Cecilbaldwin-fan, the fan blogger that popularized the original post, has expressed her remorse over the matter. The creators of Night Vale are not happy, and Cecil Baldwin has decided to take a break from social media.

So, um...do your research, kids.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-17 09:50 pm UTC (link)
It also makes the outrage easily led, as in this case. Tumblr's particularly bad for it since a bad story can spread like reblogged wildfire without people looking at other comments about it (corrections, or even edits of the original posts).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ekaterinv
2014-07-17 10:05 pm UTC (link)
Tumblr has also apparently decided that ravishment fantasies are the most evilest of evils -- and not just Tumblr. This is why I won't even go into anything that calls itself a feminist safe space any longer unless I or someone I know personally controls it. I have no idea how "feminist safe space" transmuted into "place where we scream at women (many of them victims of sexual abuse) for their sexual fantasies," but it disgusts me.

AND THIS WASN'T EVEN A RAVISHMENT FANTASY. Like, what, if we don't grapple with rape it will go away? What was the goal here? Just to yell and scream and feel self-righteous? Ugh, I am so frustrated.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kijikun
2014-07-17 10:42 pm UTC (link)
I tell myself that these are the same awful people that were being awful about shit before, they just are co-oping feminist and SJ language so they can be awful AND get all the asspats. I've found the people rabidly attacking and bullying people out of fandom spaces are really in no way feminist nor do they give a shit for anyone that isn't them or one of their friends.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ekaterinv
2014-07-17 11:05 pm UTC (link)
I was kept awake the other night wondering whether many of these people are government-hired agent provocateurs, like those who stank up the left wing in the 60s and 70s. Which is paranoia and obviously I need a tin-foil hat. But they are making our side look so bad and driving away well-meaning people.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kijikun
2014-07-17 11:16 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I would really have more stupid teenagers - because they can goddamn learn - than grown adults that crow gleefully at ruining someone's life because they once said a dumb thing or even just wrote a fic they didn't like.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-18 03:06 am UTC (link)
A lot of them are trolls or bullies using SJ as a front to make people do what they want. See also Riley/smallblackangel/shitwhitepplsay and their cult of personality that ran off a 16 year old with rape and death threats. They know they can use it to motivate people as long as they use the right buzzwords.

So yes, but without the paycheck.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]adevyish
2014-07-18 08:38 am UTC (link)
A large fandom I'm in ran a popular fanartist off Tumblr last month because having top/bottom preference in her ship meant she's homophobic, apparently. It's pretty common to get anon hate in this fandom but the sheer volume she was getting was awful. Then after she came back a couple weeks later, someone immediately started circulating another hate post about her.

It reminds me a bit of when Aja could run people off fandom (I'm still bitter over that one time with Hikaru no Go). But back then you had to be a BNF to make it take off, whereas now anyone can start a hatepost and it just needs to get picked up by a BNF blog and suddenly five thousand people all hate your guts. I live in fear of having one of my posts get big because the last couple of times, getting big = hate mail.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2014-07-18 01:53 pm UTC (link)
One of the problems with tumblr, or at least hateful people on tumblr, is that they don't seem to ever let go of anything. I mean eventually it's time to say "You know, I still don't like ___ but I'm going to go hang out with other people who don't like it and stop bothering this one particular person." But no one on tumblr seems to know how to do that. It's like beating a dead horse is a major sport.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-18 02:13 pm UTC (link)
It's partially because of how these things circulate. Even after an incident's cooled down, the post will still have legs and will reach more and more people who feel that they need to go rage about it without bothering to see what's actually going on back at the source.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2014-07-18 02:46 pm UTC (link)
A perfect non-anger example of how tumblr gets shit wrong is this post by a user called Yamino, of her golden satin mice. It says in the original post that they're her mice. Almost every new text added to the post is how they're definitely rats and how the people calling them mice are wrong because reasons.

She's reblogged the post multiple times to go 'they're mice. I know they're mice. They're my mice. I bred them' and if you look at it now, most of the text you'll see in the reblogs is about them being rats.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-18 03:45 pm UTC (link)
Every so often I go on a culling of people on my dash who mindlessly reblog things of rage and "calling out". I don't think they even give it more than the time that it takes to hit the reblog button, or have the anger that the post presents. They see the right words and just push it along.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2014-07-18 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2014-07-18 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2014-07-18 11:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2014-07-19 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2014-07-20 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2014-07-21 12:56 am UTC

[info]bobafeis
2014-07-22 07:31 am UTC (link)
I just went and googled "golden satin mice" and now I've spent far too long looking at pictures of adorableness. SO ADORABLE.

Who needs the ability to stick to the topic at hand when there are adorable pictures of tiny animals?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2014-07-21 12:54 am UTC (link)
I ended up leaving scans_daily, some years back, when I expressed concern that the new mod policies might lead to this sort of thing and was labeled a concern troll. "When has that ever happened? Let's see your evidence!"

I suppose I could provide some now, but I just don't care anymore.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sepiamagpie
2014-07-18 03:15 am UTC (link)
I think I'm sensing you have some sort of beef with these people, but I'm not sure.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ekaterinv
2014-07-18 06:43 am UTC (link)
These people in particular? No, I don't know them. "These people" meaning bullies using social justice as a cover to be complete assholes? Yes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-18 02:06 pm UTC (link)
They deserve a cattle farm's worth of beef for the harm they do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2014-07-18 02:42 pm UTC (link)
They do get a lil' shrieky. That said, I don't think you're automatically owed total acceptance for 'ravishment fantasies' as Evakernia was saying, which was what I was getting at.

They don't make you a bad person, but it's still a traumatic event that's happened to a lot of people so I'd expect side-eying. Like furries.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ekaterinv
2014-07-18 02:53 pm UTC (link)
And it's a kind of fantasy a lot of people who went through said traumatic event have. Like, a lot. A whole lot.

Also, furries? We're still side-eying furries on the internet?

Personally, I side-eye kink-shaming.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2014-07-18 02:55 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I gathered that's your particular bugbear.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-18 03:43 pm UTC (link)
No one's asking for that. They're asking for events like this not to happen.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2014-07-18 03:45 pm UTC (link)
I was reading other comments. The actual topic of the post is a ragey game of telephone that hurt people.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2014-07-18 03:49 pm UTC (link)
Yes, but you're only responding to ekaterinv with more sophisticated versions of 'u mad?' so it's really hard to tell what it is you've got a problem about.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2014-07-18 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2014-07-18 04:07 pm UTC

[info]quantumreality
2014-07-19 05:21 pm UTC (link)
Maybe not, but what goes on in someone's head is hardly something that can be regulated in any meaningful way, unless we want to go all 1984esque.

Basic example: someone might not like the fact that I think about breakfast in terms of scrambled eggs, bacon and toast. But they're my damn thoughts, so tough.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2014-07-19 11:38 pm UTC (link)
Well yeah, it's just a fantasy, not an act. What I'm saying is when it's something as extreme as that, you can't expect everyone, especially in what they consider a safe space, to go 'how wonderful!'

Like I said, you're not a bad person for having it. But just because it's something important to you doesn't mean it doesn't effect other people when you bust it out.

Your example is so basic it's light years away from the concept of a rape fantasy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]quantumreality
2014-07-20 03:26 am UTC (link)
I wasn't going to use a controversial example. The principle is the same though: A person's thoughs are their own, and like it or not that's how it is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2014-07-20 03:35 am UTC

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map