Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



anarchicq ([info]anarchicq) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
@ 2010-12-19 18:40:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Furaffinty, a wreched hive of dogfucking and rape appology.
I've been following all this personally on certain LJ communities but since it's a closed community I couldn't report it. Therefore, this is copy/pasted from Wank_report. Thanks for doing the work for me! Treat yourself to a cookie or two and happy holidays!

*WARNINGS FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT TRIGGERS!*

In the wake of the Gawker password breach, it turns out one of the admins of furry art site Fur Affinity was a member on Gawker and shared the same username/password combo on FA (it's not said who it was, yet, anyways).

As it turns out, admins can read every users notes. Suffice to say, it's not long before several belonging to Dragoneer -head honcho of FA- is leaked to the populace.

According to this report, 'Neer was covering for zoophiles/beastiality and, perhaps the most damning of them all, told a sexual assault victim (( Screencap!)) not to say anything because the rapist (Zaush/Adam Wan) is apparently a famous artist in the fandom and his fanbase would cause the risk of "backlash" and "reputation" damage (( Screencap!)).

There's so much going on and much to be found within the comments of 'Neer's journal entries (in chronological order from oldest to newest):

http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1946412/
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1952230/
http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/1952576/
(Note: These Journals have since been deleted but I,[info]anarchicq have read them and they basically went as so:

Dragoneer: What I read, I didn't feel it was rape. It was coersion but not rape.
FA users: What about the part where she said "He made me have unprotected, penetrative sex with him"?
More FA Users: What about the part where she said she complied because she was afraid of him?
Dragoneer: Oh, I missed that paragraph.
More FA Users: Jesus fucking christ Neer did you even READ the note?!)

There's lots of victim blaming, mansplaining and general rage inducers all over the place.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]staroverthebay
2010-12-21 02:44 am UTC (link)
I... uh... what is this I don't even...

I think I'm more outraged on bridgeport's behalf at all the people telling her "LOL don't take it so personally!" and others saying "the admin shouldn't have to do anything, she needs to take this up with criminal justice"

DUDE. THIS IS NOT AT ALL ABOUT FURRIES. THIS IS ABOUT A SITE ADMINISTRATOR ESSENTIALLY FACILITATING SEXUAL MISCONDUCT. And an administrator of a website should be PROTECTING his members from shit, not facilitating and perpetuating their assault and mistreatment!

And goddammit, people, Bridgeport is not being a cross-bearing martyr -- she's justifiably infuriated at the way someone's sexual assault is being swept completely under the rug.


Urgh. Faith in internet humanity... fading fast...

(Reply to this)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map