Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Amadi ([info]amadi) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
Removed from elementary school libraries is different from being removed from elementary school (or, given the depth of the topic, perhaps middle school) curricula.

The former gives young kids access to the material without any adult guidance about the context and content, allowing them to take these dehumanizing texts on board without any critical countermeasures. The latter gives an opportunity to critique and examine the text both within its time period and through contemporary lenses.

I have absolutely no problem with a school librarian saying "this is not a book that kids under age 11 are going to have access to read without supervision" based upon content. That's a school librarian's job. Just as graphic erotic content isn't on an elementary library's shelves, there's no reason why graphically racist content needs to be either.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map