Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



laila ([info]quietladybirman) wrote in [info]unfunny_fandom,
He doesn't seem to clear on 'political correctness', either. And he appears to think that a company choosing not to show a TV show featuring earthquakes and tidal waves in the wake of a horrible natural disaster that involved exactly that because the content stands a far, far higher than normal chance of being upsetting or triggering is exactly the same thing as yanking a show from broadcast because some group of moral guardians complained that two teenage characters were getting it on. Who knew getting offended and PTSD were exactly the same thing? THANKS FOR ENLIGHTNING ME, DRWANKY.

Oh, but it's totally okay for a company to choose to self-censor if they genuinely care about the feelings they might hurt. Except if it involves one of the shows he follows, of course. Then that's blatant censorship and suddenly all about self-protection! I'd like to know if he has any criteria for the 'bad' kind of self-censorship other than 'OMG political correctness and they pulled something I like', though the answer's most likely Of Course He Doesn't.

Fun fact: Drwanky is 23 years old.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map