Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



tetradecimal (tetradecimal) wrote in [info]unfunnybusiness,
@ 2009-10-26 12:33:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Haha, oh wow.
An online dating agency that excludes ugly members is to launch worldwide despite criticism that it is superficial.

Beautifulpeople.com insists applicants must submit a photograph of themselves to allow existing members to decide through an online rating system whether they are attractive enough to be admitted.

Only about one in five applications to the website is successful.

The site was launched in Denmark several years ago and has since opened in several countries including Britain, the United States and Japan. From this week, it will operate as one unified website across the globe.

In total, it has accumulated 180,000 members.

Greg Hodge, 34, managing director of the site, said: “Is it shallow to want to be with someone you’re attracted to? If you are in a bar or a club and you are going to approach someone, you’ll approach someone you’re attracted to. There’s nothing shallow in that.


“People are fed up wasting time and money meeting unattractive people on the net.”

The existing users are asked to rate photographs of those wanting to join as either “Yes, definitely”, “Hmm, yes OK”, “Hmm no, not really” or “No definitely not” and a decision is made based on the overall finding.

The website promises successful applicants “glamorous parties, a jet-set global network” and “potential contracts from top modelling agencies”.


(Post a new comment)


[info]faultypremise
2009-10-26 05:38 pm UTC (link)
Great, just what the internet needs. More superficial bullshit beauty standards.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snarkhunter
2009-10-26 05:46 pm UTC (link)
This.

(Not to mention the assumption that all people find the same things beautiful. Because beauty is purely objective, right?)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-10-26 05:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vitalitat, 2009-10-26 06:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-10-26 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-10-26 08:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-10-26 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ahiru, 2009-10-26 10:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-10-27 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fern_on_fen, 2009-10-27 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-10-27 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]finchbird, 2009-10-27 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-10-27 03:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-10-27 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffeebun, 2009-10-27 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-10-27 02:35 am UTC

[info]sandglass
2009-10-26 05:46 pm UTC (link)
Someone is missing the point of internet dating!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vorpal_blade
2009-10-27 02:53 am UTC (link)
Truly. I mean, isn't the point to make arrangements to meet someone you think you could be attracted to and get along with and to not contact people you're not interested in? And politely decline invitations from people you don't think match up with what you're looking for? Which is, on its own, going to lead to some hurt feelings, but why make people feel rejected by OMG the ENTIRE SITE? As long as a person ends up finding one person they want to be with, so that they don't feel the need for a dating site anymore, isn't the whole experience a success for them? Won't they probably recommend it highly?

I think the site owners and the site users who think this is a good thing never grew out of the adolescent need to exclude people from their "club" who they think aren't as cool as they are. Some people only grow up chronologically, not psychologically.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]the__ivorytower
2009-10-26 05:51 pm UTC (link)
Boy, it's a good thing everyone has the same set of aesthetics when it comes to getting involved with someone--

Oh, wait.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]overlord_mordax
2009-10-26 07:59 pm UTC (link)
well, the people on this site will!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2009-10-27 09:34 am UTC

[info]vitalitat
2009-10-26 06:30 pm UTC (link)
The "Must Be Beautiful" criteria reminds me of high school. $1000 says the members of the site are still stuck in it in one way or another.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kittikattie
2009-10-26 07:25 pm UTC (link)
This.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eleutheria
2009-10-27 02:39 am UTC (link)
Snacky's Law, but fully justified.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tunxeh
2009-10-27 03:41 am UTC (link)
Aren't we all?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]vitalitat, 2009-10-27 03:43 am UTC

[info]shinysandals
2009-10-26 07:50 pm UTC (link)
Oh yes, this will end well.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]overlord_mordax
2009-10-26 08:00 pm UTC (link)
Do you have to pay to be on it or is it free? If you have to pay... I smell a lawsuit!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]stella_polaris
2009-10-26 08:52 pm UTC (link)
Oh Jesus just let the shallow assholes mingle amongst themselves, maybe they'll stay off the usual dating sites.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lady_ganesh
2009-10-26 09:25 pm UTC (link)
I'm thinking this could be a net win for the gene pool.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2009-10-26 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2009-10-27 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-10-27 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tunxeh, 2009-10-27 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2009-10-28 12:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2009-10-26 10:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thepiratequeen, 2009-10-26 10:31 pm UTC

[info]adevyish
2009-10-26 09:47 pm UTC (link)
...

there's got to be a troll in that site with a fake photo.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2009-10-26 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]overlord_mordax, 2009-10-26 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aaron_agonistes, 2009-10-26 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2009-10-27 12:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-10-27 02:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_penguin, 2009-10-27 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-10-27 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2009-10-26 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-10-27 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rodo, 2009-10-27 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-10-27 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sandglass, 2009-10-27 05:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pathology_doc, 2009-10-28 01:08 am UTC

[info]gmth
2009-10-26 10:15 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that won't result in sockpuppetry at ALL.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]onyxnoir, 2009-10-28 08:51 am UTC

[info]ashu
2009-10-26 11:19 pm UTC (link)
Oh god, them. I hated their damn reality TV show about how they were opening up a version of the site for Canada (note; show ain't on TV anymore, I wonder how well that went) and I hated the general idea of the stupid site.

So just ugh. Ugh.

(Reply to this)


[info]baranduyn
2009-10-26 11:51 pm UTC (link)
I think someone should submit a photo with an application for Scott Peterson. He's pretty.

He's a fucking murderer, but they didn't automatically exclude them, did they?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2009-10-27 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]overlord_mordax, 2009-10-27 01:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2009-10-27 04:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]baranduyn, 2009-10-27 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2009-10-27 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]baranduyn, 2009-10-27 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2009-10-27 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]baranduyn, 2009-10-27 08:55 am UTC

[info]blue_linnet
2009-10-27 12:30 am UTC (link)
Oh, Jesus.

I think it's a sign that I've been on the internet WAY too long when my second reaction, (after '*seriously*?') was 'Well, at least they're being equally stringent with the requirements for men and women!'

(Reply to this)


[info]caito
2009-10-27 01:07 am UTC (link)
This report inspired me to take a trip down memory lane.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]adevyish, 2009-10-27 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffeebun, 2009-10-27 04:19 am UTC
(no subject) - ariadne484, 2009-10-29 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2009-11-03 08:25 pm UTC

[info]madelfdisease
2009-10-27 01:45 am UTC (link)
How do they determine who's attractive enough to be on their site? Is there a list of standards? Is it a voting process? Seriously, how can one even regulate something that's subjective anyway?

(Reply to this)


[info]lilgoala
2009-10-27 02:23 am UTC (link)
If you are in a bar or a club and you are going to approach someone, you’ll approach someone you’re attracted to. There’s nothing shallow in that.

LOL THERE IS EVERYTHING SHALLOW IN THAT.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2009-10-27 02:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]charamei, 2009-10-27 03:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]usagivindaloo, 2009-10-27 04:15 pm UTC

[info]notjo
2009-10-27 01:45 pm UTC (link)
They have a t.v. show about the website. I watched a few episodes last year. It was very odd.

(Reply to this)


[info]gardnerhill
2009-10-27 05:11 pm UTC (link)
I have a friend who used to breed horses. She's the one that told me that if you breed an animal solely for its color (i.e., its appearance), what you get is a dirt-stupid animal with a host of medical problems.

So pretty breeds with pretty and soon we have incredibly beautiful people wandering off cliffs and into traffic, smiling vacantly. I'm cool with that.

(Reply to this)


[info]onyxnoir
2009-10-28 08:55 am UTC (link)
...must resist urge to troll that site as Ryan Jenkins...

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map