Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rosehiptea ([info]rosehiptea) wrote in [info]unfunnybusiness,
@ 2009-10-30 15:21:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
More casting fail, this time out of Broadway
Choice of Abigail Breslin to Play Helen Keller Upsets Deaf and Blind Advocates



Choice of Abigail Breslin to Play Helen Keller Upsets Deaf and Blind Advocates
By Lindsay Robertson · October 30, 2009


On Wednesday, the producers of the Broadway revival of the play "The Miracle Worker," about the early life of blind and deaf hero Helen Keller, announced that they'd chosen the young actress who will play her on stage this winter: 13-year-old Oscar nominee Abigail Breslin. The decision has unleashed immediate complaints from groups representing blind and deaf actors who feel that an actress from their community should have been considered for the role.

Sharon Jensen, executive director of the Alliance for Inclusion in the Arts, told the New York Times "We do not think it's OK for reputable producers to cast this lead role without seriously considering an actress from our community." Jensen recognizes the difficulty Broadway plays are having attracting audiences right now, but says "I understand how difficult it is to capitalize a new production on Broadway, but that to me is not the issue. There are other, larger human and artistic issues at stake here."

For his part, the show's producer, David Richenthal, claims that the production was unable to find a blind or deaf child actor with the star power to bring in enough of an audience to justify the show's large budget, saying "It's simply naïve to think that in this day and age, you'll be able to sell tickets to a play revival solely on the potential of the production to be a great show or on the potential for an unknown actress to give a breakthrough performance," he said. "I would consider it financially irresponsible to approach a major revival without making a serious effort to get a star." The show will, however, be making an effort to find a blind or deaf actress to play Breslin's understudy -- but they won't make any promises.

The original Broadway production of "The Miracle Worker," which focuses on Helen Keller's relationship with Anne Sullivan, the teacher who taught her to communicate, debuted in 1959 with the actress Patty Duke as its star. Later, movie and TV versions of the play starred actresses Duke, Melissa Gilbert, and Mare Winningham in the role of Keller, none of whom were blind or deaf.



"I would consider it financially irresponsible to approach a major revival without making a serious effort to get a star," sounds a lot like "We didn't hire a blind or deaf actress because we wanted to make a buck." Sigh.


(Post a new comment)


[info]sandglass
2009-10-30 10:42 pm UTC (link)
Avatar fail, now a Broadway play?

(Reply to this)


[info]finchbird
2009-10-30 11:37 pm UTC (link)
I'm sure Abigail will be wonderful and all but seriously, what the hell?

(Reply to this)


[info]janegraddell
2009-10-30 11:55 pm UTC (link)
At first, I thought I'd read about this before. Then I realized that, no, this is just the second time something like this has happened this month.

Hearing Man in Deaf Role Stirs Protests in New York

When the playwright Rebecca Gilman began adapting the Carson McCullers novel "The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter" for the stage several years ago, she made a bold and controversial artistic leap: opening and ending the play with speeches by a central character, John Singer, who is deaf and mute throughout the book.

The monologues turn Singer into more than the cipher he is through large swaths of the 1940 novel. But by bestowing speech on Singer, Ms. Gilman took license with a character of symbolic importance to generations of deaf readers — a decision she justified because, McCullers wrote, Singer was once taught to speak as a boy. Inevitably, though, Ms. Gilman has made it difficult for a deaf actor to play Singer, now a speaking role.
(rest of the article is here at the NY Times site)

(Reply to this)


[info]nifflet
2009-10-31 12:17 am UTC (link)
Popping in to point out that Abigail Breslin played a blind character on an episode of NCIS, too.

That being said, I think it would make for a much more interesting decision - and marketable, despite what this guy says concerning "star power" - to cast a blind or deaf actress.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2009-10-31 12:21 am UTC (link)
I think some people would be more likely to see it with a blind or deaf actress in the role.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]thebratqueen
2009-10-31 12:24 am UTC (link)
Ditto! No offense to Abigail or anything, but has Miracle Worker ever had a blind & deaf actress? Heck, even blind and/or deaf?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2009-10-31 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thebratqueen, 2009-10-31 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2009-10-31 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wallflower, 2009-10-31 01:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-10-31 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thebratqueen, 2009-10-31 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-10-31 04:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2009-11-01 06:58 pm UTC

[info]issendai
2009-11-02 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Oh god, THAT episode. The one where the blind girl has superpowered hearing because of course your hearing gets better when you're blind, and Breslin spent the time staring blankly into space because of course that's exactly how real blind people act. AAAAAAAUGH.

But that was five years ago, so presumably her acting skills have improved.

Still, I'ma be twitching over here in the corner. I just saw that ep this weekend, so the wounds are fresh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2009-11-02 05:14 pm UTC (link)
All I can say is that if they had brought a blind actress in to play the role I might have actually watched NCIS for once.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pathology_doc
2009-10-31 12:52 am UTC (link)
The logistic and directorial difficulties that would be involved in doing this with a truly blind and deaf actress defy description.

You need someone who's good at what they do, which in this case is acting, and for a live performance I think it's important to have someone who is fully able to react to what's going on around them. Film is a different matter; you have multiple shots to get it right. If this were going to be a film I think you'd have a point, but a stage play is a different matter. If you can show me a good record for deaf&blind actors/actresses on Broadway, I might be inclined to shift on that opinion... but not until then. There might be a reason they've never cast such a person in the role, and it might even not be discrimination, regardless of what the activists say.

And as far as making a buck is concerned, where the hell do you think the money to stage these things in the first place comes from? Out of thin air? How about recouping costs? Paying costuming, props and lighting people for their work? Paying the people you buy the materials from to make the props and costumes? Paying for costs at the venue including electricity use, cleaning, advertising, etc. etc.?

Or do you think the Arts should be on an endless government tit? The problem with that is that you're potentially at the government's mercy when it comes to doing your next project, especially if that project is unflattering to the government or offends the sensibilities of whoever's handling the funding applications. Not to mention that the US Govt. is not exactly flush with cash at the moment.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2009-10-31 01:08 am UTC (link)
First of all, the activists seem to be speaking of an actress who's blind or deaf, not necessarily one who's both (though I realize Helen Keller was both.)

If it would be so impossible to have such an actress in the play, then why are they saying they'll consider it for the understudy?

Here's an excerpt from another article here:

Mr. Richenthal said that he and the production’s director, Kate Whoriskey, as well as their casting director, planned to audition deaf or blind actresses to be Ms. Breslin’s understudy, and would hire sign language interpreters for the auditions of the young deaf women.

The distinction between the lead role and the understudy is that the show can sell tickets with its lead actress, Mr. Richenthal said. He emphasized that if he could not find a “qualified” deaf or blind actress who was right for the part, he would cast a hearing and seeing actress in the role.


So he's admitting that it's about the money and not about any practical difficulties. And while I realize plays have to make money to keep going, that doesn't justify taking an actress from outside a group to portray a member of that group. Besides, who's to say people wouldn't want to see a deaf or blind actress in the role? I'd rather see that than Abigail Breslin, and I like Abigail Breslin.

And there never will be a good track record for deaf or blind actors and actresses if no one will hire them.

(And no, I personally wasn't suggesting increasing government spending for the arts in this economy. That's getting way off the topic.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sandglass
2009-10-31 05:30 am UTC (link)
Or do you think the Arts should be on an endless government tit?

Did you really have to go there?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2009-10-31 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2009-10-31 07:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2009-10-31 06:14 pm UTC

[info]goblin
2009-10-31 06:38 am UTC (link)
Hahahaha--er, wait, you're *not* parodying senseless and bigoted statement? Oh dear.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ravenstar84
2009-10-31 06:48 am UTC (link)
"The logistic and directorial difficulties that would be involved in doing this with a truly blind and deaf actress defy description.

You need someone who's good at what they do, which in this case is acting, and for a live performance I think it's important to have someone who is fully able to react to what's going on around them. Film is a different matter; you have multiple shots to get it right. If this were going to be a film I think you'd have a point, but a stage play is a different matter. If you can show me a good record for deaf&blind actors/actresses on Broadway, I might be inclined to shift on that opinion... but not until then. There might be a reason they've never cast such a person in the role, and it might even not be discrimination, regardless of what the activists say."



Actually, there are actors with disablities who are being trained to be actors. I'm guessing a blind actor would need extra help in getting to know the set/or may need help performing around the set, which I think can be fixed depending how the director decides to block the play. I can't imagine it'll be that hard due to the fact that the character already is blind and the play already works around that. But the actor can still rely on the sounds around them by hearing their lines, other people's lines, and even sounds of footsteps or what not. A deaf person would need a translater in sign language, I would think. They'd still be able to see the set and other actors around them, their blocking and whatever movements they make.

Deaf or blind, being either one does not keep them incapable of fully understanding their lines or cues. If the actor is a trained actor, they'd know exactly what they are up against already regardless if its film or live performance. Both require a huge amount of physical energy for their work, neither blindness nor deafness prevent that. So I don't see how more expensive this would be to hire a blind or deaf actor, except for maybe hiring a sign language translator.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-10-31 03:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenstar84, 2009-11-01 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-11-01 01:50 pm UTC

[info]chikane
2009-10-31 08:15 am UTC (link)
If you can show me a good record for deaf&blind actors/actresses on Broadway, I might be inclined to shift on that opinion...

People don't try it, which "proves" it doesn't work to people who cannot understand logic, which is why people don't try it.

Which is why it's important to do it. You don't even realize that you prove it with your posting, huh? So, uhm, thanks for illustrating so well why the Deaf and Blind Advocates are absolutely correct in their criticism.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ultimi_scopuli
2009-10-31 10:20 am UTC (link)
Ah, the unavoidable stupid thoughtless comment. It was a matter of time.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]snarkhunter
2009-10-31 03:14 pm UTC (link)
Tell me, what are your feelings on Beethoven, Marlie Matlin, and Ray Charles?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2009-10-31 04:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-10-31 04:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2009-10-31 04:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bienegold, 2009-10-31 10:21 pm UTC

[info]tehrin
2009-10-31 05:15 pm UTC (link)
The fact that there are blind, deaf, and disabled performers means that there are performers who are just as able-bodied as other performers to be on stage with them and theaters are capable of accommodating them. Also, not all dead and blind actors are entirely incapable of sight, hearing, or speech. The play DOES incorporate the use of sign within its structure (as it is CENTRAL to the entire production) and Hellen has only one line at the end. Oh, and they DO use microphones on stage in most productions. This is BROADWAY and not some elementary school production.

In short, I think you're profoundly ignorant about people with disabilities and how capable they are.

As far as art being on any government tit, in America, we already had that entirely snatched away from us in the 1980's. THANK YOU, JESSE HELMS. The N.E.A. receives little funding to give to artists as grants and even then, because of Helms, they already have to meet obscenity restrictions. Not all grants are project specific grants and most, pretty much ALL, funding comes from private corporations or entities for art projects. And Broadway has little trouble generating enough revenue independently.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-11-01 01:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2009-11-01 08:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarkhunter, 2009-11-01 01:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2009-11-01 07:59 pm UTC

[info]wallflower
2009-10-31 01:10 am UTC (link)
Two of the bigger theatre message boards, BroadwayWorld and All That Chat, have been talking about this the past few days too (if you don't like the thread layout at ATC, click the "flat mode" button at the top).

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2009-10-31 01:12 am UTC (link)
Thanks for the links!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]goblin, 2009-10-31 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadwing, 2009-10-31 04:12 pm UTC

[info]cjk
2009-10-31 02:32 pm UTC (link)
Preparing to be lynched here, but he does have a point with the "financially irresponsible" shtick. On the other hand, this is seriously faily, especially after the Avatar casting thing.

(Reply to this)


[info]amadi
2009-10-31 04:14 pm UTC (link)
The financial issue of Broadway right now is a big one. Right now most productions are merely breaking even or recouping their costs, taking in enough at the box office to justify keeping the production going but only for a while. There are only two productions right now that are notably profitable, one is Hamlet, a London import production (which significantly lowered costs) starring Jude Law, and the other is A Steady Rain which was drubbed by critics but has James Bond & Wolverine Daniel Craig and Hugh Jackman and is consequently sold out for its entire (limited) run and is breaking box office records compared to other shows in this down economy.

Star power has been driving Broadway casting for a very long time, and plays are especially susceptible to the lure because plays are a much harder sell than musicals. Tourists see musicals, theatregoers see plays. And if you can advertise your play, even one with a well-known name like The Miracle Worker with a known name actor in an important role, your chances of being able to keep the doors open are much, much higher. (Even if said name actor isn't so good on stage, see: Julia Roberts in Three Days of Rain.)

I understand the producers' trepidation when weighing "what would be a bigger draw, a known and acclaimed child actor (a rarity) or an unknown but actually blind or deaf actor?" And the reality is that no one knows the answer to the question. It's a gamble either way. It would have been really very nice to see them take the bigger gamble, but that's easy to say about other people's money.

I think this is where the nasty corporate term synergy can come into play. Like other minority arts alliances have done in the past, The Alliance for Inclusion in the Arts needs to team up with a Broadway production group with a good history to work together to get better representation of people with disabilities on stage. Or they should poach some medium-level production players, find a benefactor with $$ and mount their own productions in the "we'll roll our own" ethos. Advocacy can be a good thing, but action is even better.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]wallflower
2009-10-31 06:00 pm UTC (link)
There are only two productions right now that are notably profitable, one is Hamlet, a London import production (which significantly lowered costs) starring Jude Law, and the other is A Steady Rain which was drubbed by critics but has James Bond & Wolverine Daniel Craig and Hugh Jackman and is consequently sold out for its entire (limited) run and is breaking box office records compared to other shows in this down economy.

I know you're saying "compared to other shows," but there are a number of shows that are currently running at a profit. Billy Elliot, Jersey Boys, The Lion King, West Side Story, and Wicked all had grosses that topped $1 million last week. There are also other shows (such as Hair, In the Heights, and the old stalwarts like Mamma Mia and Phantom) that are making their weekly nut and then some. I'm not saying everything is hunky-dory on Broadway (it's not, especially with winter around the corner), but those aren't the only two "notably profitable" productions.

And even if you're just talking about plays and not musicals, you've neglected God of Carnage, which has a higher average ticket price AND a higher gross than Hamlet, despite being in a theater with 1800 fewer seats than Hamlet's (Hamlet, btw, has yet to gross more than $905k and play more than 90% capacity in a week).

"Star power has been driving Broadway casting for a very long time, and plays are especially susceptible to the lure because plays are a much harder sell than musicals. Tourists see musicals, theatregoers see plays. And if you can advertise your play, even one with a well-known name like The Miracle Worker with a known name actor in an important role, your chances of being able to keep the doors open are much, much higher. (Even if said name actor isn't so good on stage, see: Julia Roberts in Three Days of Rain.)"

This is true. The recent revival of Neil Simon's Brighton Beach Memoirs, which has no major star, got overall solid reviews when it opened a week or two ago, but it's posted a provisional closing notice (it might or might not close this weekend) because it isn't making money. If it closes, the show that was supposed to come later in November and play in repertory with BBM, Broadway Bound, will be canceled as well. A lot of other plays, such as Superior Donuts, won't last the winter (a lot of musicals won't either -- Shrek's already posted its closing announcement for January). Big names help get shows off the ground, and they can help keep shows open.

I would love to see another production like the 2004 revival of Big River, which featured a cast of deaf, hard-of-hearing, and hearing actors (it was a transfer of a production from the awesome Deaf West Theatre). That was produced by not-for-profit Roundabout, so while the risk was still there, it didn't have quite the same financial consequences as a commercial theater company.

Sorry about the teal deer.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amadi, 2009-10-31 06:30 pm UTC

[info]the_con_cept
2009-11-01 12:28 am UTC (link)
I really don't get the people saying a blind and deaf person couldn't do this role. You know who would probably disagree with that? Helen Fucking Keller. Way to fail at understanding the whole point of the play.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]red_eft
2009-11-01 06:31 am UTC (link)
+1

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kylenne
2009-11-01 09:11 pm UTC (link)
Also they know how many hearing-impaired and blind actors there are in NYC? That are really goddamn talented and starving?

It reminds me of all the racist arguments against using models of color on runways. Same shit different story. *sighs*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2009-11-01 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_con_cept, 2009-11-02 04:10 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map