Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



gusty ([info]gusty) wrote in [info]unfunnybusiness,
@ 2010-02-17 02:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Pattinson is allergic to vagina.
SOOOO it took some debating which community to put this in -- here or [info]fandom_lounge. Eventually I decided here was best.

The racy photo shoot he did for Details positioned the heartthrob between the legs of a female model, and Pattinson said it made him a bit antsy.

"I really hate vaginas," he said. "I'm allergic to vagina. But I can't say I had no idea, because it was a 12-hour shoot, so you kind of get the picture that these women are going to stay naked after, like, five or six hours. But I wasn't exactly prepared. I had no idea what to say to these girls. Thank God I was hungover."


Full article here.

Really, what more can I say? It speaks for itself.


(Post a new comment)


[info]kumquat_of_doom
2010-02-17 02:18 pm UTC (link)
...Oh, RPattz. Given his fangirls, I'm not surprised he's been put off. Bless.

(Seriously, you may wish to reconsider not Fandom Lounging this; I think it's comedy gold.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]quantumreality
2010-02-17 03:43 pm UTC (link)
It rather is, IMO.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2010-02-17 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 07:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2010-02-17 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 08:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2010-02-17 08:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esclaramonde, 2010-02-18 03:10 am UTC

[info]pantyless_angel
2010-02-17 10:29 pm UTC (link)
Seriously, if I had fans who chased me into oncoming traffic I would do what ever I could to discourage them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]telegramsam
2010-02-17 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Okay, I LOL'd, I admit it.

But that's okay, because my vagina (along with my everything else) is allergic to him, and his legion of obnoxious preteen fangirls.

And how nice that he likes his dog and 80's pornography. We all really care to know that.

(Reply to this)


[info]paranoidandroid
2010-02-17 02:48 pm UTC (link)
Allergic? He'll have hordes of fangirls volunteering to help with his desensitization therapy, I guess XD

(Reply to this)


[info]gmth
2010-02-17 03:13 pm UTC (link)
LOL, this guy's a real keeper.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]footsie
2010-02-17 05:42 pm UTC (link)
I want to steal your icon, and use it in a comm full of Snapewives.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]coffee_mug
2010-02-17 04:02 pm UTC (link)
This reminds me of that newstory of the woman who was allergic to her husband's semen .. or semen in general but they discovered it only after marriage.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]come_love_sleep
2010-02-17 08:25 pm UTC (link)
O_O Poor thing!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jupiterpluvius
2010-02-17 09:01 pm UTC (link)
Semen allergy isn't incredibly rare. What would be horrible would be to have both semen allergy and latex allergy, because no sex for you without the elusive polyurethane condom!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2010-02-17 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2010-02-18 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2010-02-18 06:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2010-02-18 05:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2010-02-18 06:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jupiterpluvius, 2010-02-18 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2010-02-19 12:48 am UTC

[info]veneotaqueen
2010-02-17 04:05 pm UTC (link)
I already read this on a friend LJ.
We have begun the countdown for his official outing. No way an hetero man can say this.
Albeit I could understand his reason for these "colorful" declarations, namely the one in the icon I'm just using.
A lil' question: when he eventually backpedals, he'll say "I'm allergic just to vaginal tissue; the rest of your women bodies are just fine with me"?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]brennalarose
2010-02-17 04:36 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, that was my thought, too. Not that it makes him any less decorative, IMO, but maybe that'll mean he gets to smile more

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rganymede
2010-02-17 04:50 pm UTC (link)
LOL, yeah. Either he's gay or he really wants his fangirls to think so, which I can't really blame him for.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-02-17 06:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 07:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2010-02-17 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 07:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cygnia, 2010-02-17 07:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nursewretched, 2010-02-17 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deliciouschaos, 2010-02-17 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cygnia, 2010-02-17 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ianthefira, 2010-02-17 11:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rganymede, 2010-02-17 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]melannen, 2010-02-17 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]back_in_black, 2010-02-17 07:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2010-02-17 08:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2010-02-18 01:40 am UTC

[info]ayezur
2010-02-17 05:51 pm UTC (link)
He could also have been trying for a variation on the old joke: "I'm allergic to women, whenever one's around I swell up." If you know what I mean. And I think you do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2010-02-17 09:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]veneotaqueen, 2010-02-17 09:16 pm UTC

[info]amadi
2010-02-17 05:48 pm UTC (link)
In the grand scheme of things, I care less about RPattz in this than Kristen Stewart who is either being played for a fool or is the worst placed, most obvious beard in history.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kumquat_of_doom
2010-02-17 07:39 pm UTC (link)
Assuming he actually is gay/asexual/whatever and isn't just being drunk/stoned/failing to make a particularly terrible joke, I can't imagine she doesn't know. I mean, if he's this obvious in an interview...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amadi, 2010-02-17 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 07:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amadi, 2010-02-17 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2010-02-17 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2010-02-17 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2010-02-17 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2010-02-18 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]scifantasy, 2010-02-18 02:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silmaril, 2010-02-18 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2010-02-18 07:08 am UTC

[info]vejiicakes
2010-02-17 08:18 pm UTC (link)
How close was he posing between this model's legs that her vagina actually factored into it, as opposed to like, all that surface area that's actually outside the female body? Was he INSIDE her this entire shoot? Or is it a proximity thing--within half a foot, just the smell of it starts to make him break out in hives..?

Seriously though, oh RPattz XD Where's the best comm to watch the fallout from this?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2010-02-17 09:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dana, 2010-02-17 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2010-02-18 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gmth, 2010-02-18 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]randomsome1, 2010-02-18 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2010-02-18 04:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vejiicakes, 2010-02-18 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2010-02-18 05:59 am UTC

[info]indis_earfalas
2010-02-17 09:42 pm UTC (link)
Good grief. I never thought I'd see the day where I felt like defending SparkleArse, but I suppose anything is possible.

He also said he wanted to go into the sex shop across the road and dress up in the horse sex gear so that he could do the interview from an equine point of view.

Given how dry and sarcy he can be, I'd say it's a pretty good bet that he wasn't actually SERIOUS.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eleutheria, 2010-02-18 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]catchester, 2010-02-18 01:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sequinedlizard, 2010-02-20 06:21 am UTC

[info]sgtgeorgecarter
2010-02-17 09:53 pm UTC (link)
"Thank God I was hungover."

Bllahhahahhaha Excellent!

(Reply to this)


[info]syldana
2010-02-18 01:52 am UTC (link)
From the comments. Apparently it could be just a poorly told joke.

natalie February 15th, 2010 8:56 pm ET

@Bill Carson

He was glad he was hungover so as not to walk around the photoshoot set and in front of everybody with an ERECTION, that's why he says he's allergic and was glad for a hungover, it prevented some really embarassing moments on the set...

The joke starts with
Man: 'Doctor, I hate vaginas, I think I'm allergic to them.
Doctor: Why do you say that?
Man: Because my p*nis swells up whenever I see one'
or something to that effect.

(Reply to this)


[info]ekaterinv
2010-02-18 02:12 am UTC (link)
He comes across as SO YOUNG to me, and trying his damndest to be edgy and off-putting because he doesn't want to be pigeonholed as Edward, a character he hates. And the fangirls freak him out. I think this is just like not washing his hair. He needs to hire whoever handles Taylor Lautner though.

(Reply to this)


[info]alienist
2010-02-18 04:34 am UTC (link)
Well, honestly, I'd say the same thing about penes.

(Reply to this)


[info]lexingmouse3
2010-02-18 12:13 pm UTC (link)
Oh, stop trolling RPattz.

(Reply to this)


[info]stella_polaris
2010-02-18 04:35 pm UTC (link)
Is this really particularly unfunny? It's not misogynistic if you ask me, mostly... a little gross.

(Reply to this)


redwarrior
2010-02-19 10:32 pm UTC (link)
I don't think "gay" as much as I think "asexual" when I read this.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map