Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Magically Ridiculous ([info]staroverthebay) wrote in [info]unfunnybusiness,
@ 2010-06-12 00:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Amused

This is actually a riot, but I defaulted to posting here because, well, "When in doubt, UFB" also, no one is wanking, but it's still a hilarious incident. There are some elements to it that aren't so nice (such as the incidents that prompted the report in the first place)

But I seriously got a hell of a laugh out of this.

Then there's Maude! Consultant's TriMet safety report references nude photos of Bea Arthur

Published: Wednesday, June 09, 2010, 5:06 PM
Updated: Wednesday, June 09, 2010, 5:54 PM
by Joseph Rose, The Oregonian

In all honesty, nothing in the "phase one" report from the outside consultant conducting a top-to-bottom safety review of TriMet was all that startling.

That is, unless you consider the nude photos of Bea Arthur.

Actually, there weren't actual pictures of the late actress (rest her soul) in the buff. But for some reason, a photo of pedestrians in an urban crosswalk on page 17 of the memo is titled "Naked Pictures of Bea Arthur 0105.jpg."


The file name popped up for anyone rolling their mouse over the photo in the PDF version of the memo initially released by TriMet. Yep, and then there's Maude!

TriMet spokeswoman Mary Fetsch said she doesn't doesn't know the story behind the lurid file name, pointing out that hired consultants K&J Safety and Security Consulting Services of Cantonment, Fla., put together the memo.

Oregon's largest transit agency has since sent along a version of the report without the reference to Bea Arthur, which we agreed to upload in the place of the one initially posted with The Oregonian story.

Hard Drive's advice to the company in charge of TriMet's "top-to-bottom" review: Don't forget a top-to-bottom of your "phase two" memo before it's released to the public.

That's a freebie. Stay classy.


An amusing form of "What is this, I don't even--"

I don't think I want to know how this happened, but I suspect it's an inside-joke that got out of hand.


(Post a new comment)


[info]cygnia
2010-06-12 06:55 pm UTC (link)
I just want to know where was Deadpool during all of this?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]chaos_penguin
2010-06-13 09:17 am UTC (link)
I feel the answer to that one has got to be either 1. Badly screwing up a covert data retrieval job at K&J Safety and Security Consulting Services (which was supposed to involve transferring *their* files to *his* computer, not the other way around), or 2. Feeling horribly cheated and let down by misleading alt-tags in documents retrieved during the former.

Either way, it's bound to end in violence.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]athersgeo
2010-06-12 07:04 pm UTC (link)
Page 17 of a MEMO?!??!

Where I come from, memos are short and to the point, usually no more than one page - and people STILL don't read them. I'm just amazed anyone got that far...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ruslan
2010-06-13 03:21 am UTC (link)
I thought that too until somebody mentioned Orson Welles' memo to Universal about the original cut of Touch of Evil (which you can read here if you've got some time to kill), which runs to a full 58 pages. That's pushing novella territory, imho.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]athersgeo
2010-06-13 06:08 am UTC (link)
I agree entirely - though I tend to think that Orson Welles was a special case all ways round so maybe shouldn't count!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]freezer
2010-06-13 09:03 am UTC (link)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


ariadne484
2010-06-13 01:33 pm UTC (link)
This is truly the winningest macro ever.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

WIN!
[info]telegramsam
2010-06-14 12:29 pm UTC (link)
Here, have a internets.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]poisonyoulove
2010-06-13 09:13 am UTC (link)
Was it . . . someone making a reference to the movie Airheads?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]braidedbaka
2010-06-14 12:35 am UTC (link)
That's what I'm wondering too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]octopedingenue
2010-06-16 12:48 am UTC (link)
What they did was use this picture from this Wikipedia user while forgetting to change the filename and/or credit the user. Picstealing and stupidity are both illegal on the internet, guys!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]staroverthebay
2010-06-16 01:43 am UTC (link)
Picstealing is, but I don't think stupidity is illegal, or else we've got a HELL OF A LOT of criminals on the internetz XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map