Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



El Juno ([info]eljuno) wrote in [info]wank_report,
@ 2010-07-18 21:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: thoughtful
Current music:White Rabbits - Percussion Gun

This is the third edition of the [info]wank_report default post. Please only comment here if this is the only visible post with space for comments.

All tips posted under this post are fair game to anyone who wants them, but please comment if you take one, in the interests of keeping duplicate wank to a minimum.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: MACY'S FIRES SANTA (no not the movie, for reals!)
(Anonymous)
2010-12-09 12:51 pm UTC (link)
It doesn't have to be the woman's workplace to constitute as sexual harrassment in a workplace.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: MACY'S FIRES SANTA (no not the movie, for reals!)
(Anonymous)
2010-12-09 08:17 pm UTC (link)
Sexual harassment. Go look it up.

Especially the "threatening atmosphere" part.

Or the very fact that harassment implies that there was more than one occasion of "harassment".

Still, this is borderline disrespectful for victims or real harassment, who see that their very real, often months- or years-long sufferings, are JUST THE SAME FUCKING THING THAN A STRANGER JOKING ABOUT SEX. It is thanks to such White Knights that anything and everything become "rape", thus effectively negating the sufferings of its victims.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: MACY'S FIRES SANTA (no not the movie, for reals!)
(Anonymous)
2010-12-09 10:22 pm UTC (link)
Especially the "threatening atmosphere" part.

You mean, like sexual abuse victims who have to go around their daily life accepting that anyone anywhere is in fact allowed to comment on their sex life and tell them what it should be like, and they never have a right to be upset by any remark or joke because people don't mean it badly?

Or the very fact that harassment implies that there was more than one occasion of "harassment".

No. A single case of "Sleep with me if you want that job", for example, is enough to qualify as sexual harrassment AFAIK.

Still, this is borderline disrespectful for victims or real harassment, who see that their very real, often months- or years-long sufferings, are JUST THE SAME FUCKING THING THAN A STRANGER JOKING ABOUT SEX.

Because there are never any degrees in anything. Right.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: MACY'S FIRES SANTA (no not the movie, for reals!)
(Anonymous)
2010-12-10 02:36 am UTC (link)
Or that there are more forms of sexual harassment and you keep pigeonholing it into a non applicable case.

This is a man who joked about sex while he was working. Macy's decided to execute a no-tolerance policy given the nature of where he said such jokes.

People felt distressed. The distress was sexual in nature.

Sexual harassment.

And victims of aforementioned would have even less tolerance for these kind of jokes. Even if "HEZ A NICE GUY"

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map