Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Pan ([info]panthea) wrote in [info]wankitywank,
@ 2006-10-28 01:51:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:WTF?

"But maybe she shouldn't be having sex if it's life-threatening."
Fucksake, this hasn't even made it off [info]clairvoyantwank yet, and already the mice are bringing the HEADDESK.

Quick background: Biting Beaver had sex with her long-time male cohabitating personage. The condom broke. It took about three days before she found a place willing to give her EC. It didn't take. She had to get an abortion.

Oh, yeah: and HAVING ANOTHER CHILD COULD KILL HER.

We have: Snap judgments!
I don't know the background here, but why hasn't she gotten her tubes tied if another pregnancy could kill her? It just seems really irresponsible (to me) to rely on a condom alone in a situation like that.

Well-meaning advice!
But maybe she shouldn't be having sex if it's life-threatening.

Condescension ahoy!
There are plenty of ways to be sexually active with your partner that don't involve STICKING IT IN. For this woman, in her unique situation, sex is a very serious health risk that could KILL HER if she doesn't smarten up. Logically, she should either:

A) Avoid vaginal sex
-or-
B) Take extra steps to avoid getting pregnant

She's doing neither.


More-feminist-than-thou!
It was most likely a miscalculation on her part to continue that particular kind of penetrative sex at all. For a feminist who's supposed to be all in charge of her sexuality, she seems to have a limited idea about what constitutes letting her partner, "stick his dick in [her]." Whatever the case, I still stand by my original statement; Sodomy, yahy!

Is that BACKPEDALING I smell?
Nononononono! *backs away slowly* I'm not calling her a whore at all, I'm just saying that from reading her blog it seems she believes vaginal intercourse is the only viable form of penetration that she could achive in a sexual relationship. Really, I was advicating kinky sex and a more in-depth exploration of her sex and sexuality from a feminist POV. You know, turning tragedy into triumph and all that.

The moral of this story: if pregnancy could kill you, then no vaginal sex for you! Sodomy all the way!




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]tez
2006-10-28 06:21 am UTC (link)
GIP, man.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-10-28 12:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-10-28 02:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-28 03:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2006-10-28 03:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-28 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-10-28 03:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-29 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-10-29 07:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-29 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2006-10-29 08:11 am UTC

[info]sisterelwood
2006-10-28 06:25 am UTC (link)
I noticed this pop-up on a day ago. I didn't think I'd see it here... at least not so soon.

(Reply to this)

whaaa?
[info]neridne
2006-10-28 06:29 am UTC (link)
Whaaa? I'm sooo confused. What's going on... why is this woman's sexual relations public business anyway????

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: whaaa? - ealusaid, 2006-10-28 07:11 am UTC

[info]lizzypaul
2006-10-28 06:37 am UTC (link)
Holy shit.

I had to get an IUD for medical reasons, not related to birth control. One of the ladies in our church told me that an IUD was a sin, because on the off chance I was RAPED, the IUD would abort the baby.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-28 06:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2006-10-28 06:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-29 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowkitty, 2006-10-29 10:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-29 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iris, 2006-10-28 06:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2006-10-28 06:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iris, 2006-10-28 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2006-11-05 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chikane, 2006-10-28 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-28 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-10-28 05:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-28 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-10-28 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 12:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-10-29 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackhat, 2006-10-30 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-31 12:27 am UTC

[info]kittikattie
2006-10-28 06:43 am UTC (link)
*gets that eyetwitch*

(Reply to this)


[info]amxjm
2006-10-28 06:49 am UTC (link)
Abortion wank makes me all headhurty, and I'm not even a woman. *headde-ow*

(Reply to this)


[info]deadlettero
2006-10-28 06:56 am UTC (link)
For a feminist who's supposed to be all in charge of her sexuality, she seems to have a limited idea about what constitutes letting her partner, "stick his dick in [her]." Whatever the case, I still stand by my original statement; Sodomy, yahy!

So... If you don't like buttsex, you're not a true feminist?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2006-10-28 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2006-10-28 07:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2006-10-28 10:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2006-10-28 02:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2006-10-29 07:28 am UTC

[info]puipui
2006-10-28 07:10 am UTC (link)
I don't know the background here, but why hasn't she gotten her tubes tied if another pregnancy could kill her? It just seems really irresponsible (to me) to rely on a condom alone in a situation like that.

I have to admit here that it took me an obscenely long time to walk away from this comment when it first got posted, and even that was mostly because I was headdesking so hard that I couldn't think of anything sufficiently scathing to say.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-10-28 08:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-10-28 02:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]issendai, 2006-10-28 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-28 07:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-28 09:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2006-10-28 09:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-28 11:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]billymasqets, 2006-10-29 08:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-29 02:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-29 12:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2006-10-29 12:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2006-10-29 03:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-10-29 04:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-29 04:09 am UTC
... - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-10-29 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2006-10-29 04:37 am UTC
... - [info]luthe, 2006-11-05 07:04 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 04:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-10-29 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2006-10-29 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-30 01:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]katienichol, 2006-10-29 02:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]scorpio20, 2006-10-29 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-29 04:05 am UTC

ealusaid
2006-10-28 07:14 am UTC (link)
In the back of my daily notebook I keep a list that I maintain, mainly after having to sit through prayer group. It's called "I will call myself pro-life when:" and includes things like, "We all realize everyone has the right to live. This includes doctors whose decisions we disagree with," "Our medicine has arrived at a point where no pregnancy is life-threatening" and "Vilifying or heaping hatred on women is unacceptable".

It just got a whoooole lot longer.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]quettaser, 2006-10-28 12:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowkitty, 2006-10-29 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2006-10-29 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowkitty, 2006-10-29 11:04 pm UTC

flightstothesea
2006-10-28 08:30 am UTC (link)
WHAT.

No really, WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK?

(Reply to this)


jenova
2006-10-28 09:04 am UTC (link)
My god, it's like an entire generation of feminists actually believed what their abstinence-only sex ed classes told them.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2006-10-28 11:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-28 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-30 05:16 am UTC

[info]wankismyfandom
2006-10-28 09:14 am UTC (link)
Oh for fuck's sake. It's got to be rum o'clock.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]exdee, 2006-10-28 01:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2006-10-28 02:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 03:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_wanlorn, 2006-10-28 02:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2006-10-28 06:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 08:24 pm UTC

[info]ashenmote
2006-10-28 09:37 am UTC (link)
Oh, it could have been so much worse.

Hey, but the mousey in charge of everyone else's sexuality has a point there. Why risking penetrative sex when you can wank on clairvoyant with virtually no chance for wankitywank instead?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-10-28 02:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-28 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2006-10-28 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-28 09:10 pm UTC

[info]big_bad_wolf
2006-10-28 10:36 am UTC (link)
EG HAQvdhabdva;ibvcsda'jcn asxas` cbhwgdfqsaasf *HEADDESKDESKHEADDESKFUCKINGDESK*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 12:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mookie, 2006-10-28 12:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]suziecroft, 2006-10-28 01:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]autumnyte, 2006-10-28 03:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-28 08:14 pm UTC

[info]rotten_fish
2006-10-28 02:34 pm UTC (link)
But, seriously, did she not know that condoms can break? Come on.

But, seriously, did she not know that there was a rapist, gunman, and burglar on the loose on her campus? Rotten should have stayed inside and locked all her doors. Come on.

Bitch, you can blow me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2006-10-28 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]freezer, 2006-10-28 06:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-28 07:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2006-10-28 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-28 09:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-28 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2006-10-29 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-10-30 02:02 am UTC
WTF, Bad!mice?
[info]alastor
2006-10-28 03:32 pm UTC (link)
I'm really starting to consider the need for a "disappointed in the mice" icon.

Maybe it'll hold me over until the day we can punch stupid people through the internet.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: WTF, Bad!mice? - [info]emiweebee, 2006-10-28 03:57 pm UTC

[info]emiweebee
2006-10-28 03:57 pm UTC (link)
Bad mice! You should NOT wank without context!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]majorburns, 2006-10-28 05:34 pm UTC

[info]missdaisy
2006-10-28 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Well, duh! Any woman who talks openly and rationally about having an abortion is obviously lying. Such a shameful act should be kept in the closet where it belongs.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2006-10-28 06:58 pm UTC

[info]khym_chanur
2006-10-28 04:33 pm UTC (link)
Huh, I had been expecting the more fanatical of the anti-abortion people to bring something like this up: "Well, yes, another pregnancy could be life-threatening to you, but you knew there was a chance, however, slight, of getting pregnant from having sex, so you should risk your life to give the poor little embryo a chance".

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-10-28 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-29 12:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-10-29 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2006-10-29 07:12 am UTC
Having read a little more...
[info]sisterelwood
2006-10-28 05:58 pm UTC (link)
My mom couldn't have any more kids after I was born for similar health reasons. I asked her once if that stopped her from having sex. She's Catholic as am I and I was curious what her take was on the idea of no sex outside of having it to become pregnant. She told me, very frankly (maybe it's because she's a nurse and talking about bodily functions do not phase her in the least it seems) that if God wanted people to stop having sex when they were not doing it to have children then it was stupid to make it enjoyable even after metapause.

I know it's rather gross to think about but she made a valid point. Just because your body gets messed up by something outside of your control doesn't mean you have to stop having sex- you just have to be a little more careful. But, now I'm thinking logically- d'oh!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Having read a little more... - [info]darkrose, 2006-10-28 10:04 pm UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 12:32 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]pyratejenni, 2006-10-29 02:01 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 02:08 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-10-30 02:05 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 02:56 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-10-30 05:53 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 06:04 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]harrylovesron, 2006-10-30 06:08 am UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 06:14 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]katienichol, 2006-10-29 02:39 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]bubosquared, 2006-10-29 04:30 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]flowerstar, 2006-10-29 11:29 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - ealusaid, 2006-10-29 11:06 pm UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 06:05 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - ealusaid, 2006-10-30 06:26 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 06:33 am UTC
Re: Having read a little more... - [info]shadowkitty, 2006-10-29 10:50 pm UTC

[info]seraphtrevs
2006-10-28 06:21 pm UTC (link)
D :

(Reply to this)


[info]tehrin
2006-10-28 06:56 pm UTC (link)
The minute I saw this, I knew this was going to happen. :(

(Reply to this)


[info]sarajayechan
2006-10-28 07:59 pm UTC (link)
but why hasn't she gotten her tubes tied if another pregnancy could kill her?

Yeah, cause it's not like her husband could get a vasectomy or something. But according to these people, the baby grows inside the woman so it's aaaalll her responsibility to prevent babies from happening.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-28 09:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2006-10-29 11:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2006-10-29 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2006-10-29 11:11 pm UTC
Reposted from clairvoyant comment
[info]sequinedlizard
2006-10-28 08:39 pm UTC (link)
Dear mousies suggesting spermicide as her best option:

From her blog: I have no health insurance, plus I have had most of my cervix removed and the cervical cap and other barrier methods will have little or no effectiveness on me (or so I've been told by my doctor).

From http://scc.uchicago.edu/vaginalspermicides.htm

Disadvantages

* It is not clear what degree of protection spermicides provide against sexually transmitted infections (STIs). They do provide some protection against chlamydia and gonorrhea, two common STIs that can cause infertility. However, the chemicals in spermicide may damage cells in the vagina and make women more likely to contract the human immunodeficiency virus (the virus that causes AIDS) from an infected partner.
* Some women (or their partners) may not be able to insert the spermicide properly.
* Spermicide can cause irritation of the vagina or the penis in some people.
* Spermicide must be used before contact between the penis and the vagina. Some couples do not like interrupting sexual activity to insert spermicide.
* Spermicides are not to be used before oral sex as the residual taste is unappealing.

Who Cannot Use Spermicide
You cannot use spermicide if you or your partner(s) are allergic to the ingredients in the spermicide. Women with some abnormalities of the vagina may not be able to use spermicide.

Given that she's had cervical surgery, it is quite possible that the spermicides commonly available would not be usable, and if she doesn't have insurance, she may not be able to afford any non-OTC options. She doesn't specifically address spermicides in her blog, but she does make it clear that she went through many options before deciding on using condoms. So perhaps she's not being as irresponsible as you suggest.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Reposted from clairvoyant comment - [info]darkrose, 2006-10-28 10:16 pm UTC
Re: Reposted from clairvoyant comment - [info]sequinedlizard, 2006-10-29 03:17 am UTC

[info]warrioreowyn
2006-10-28 11:58 pm UTC (link)
Er...I really don't get what's wanky about the suggestion of "don't do something that's got a good chance of killing you". If that's wanky, saying "stay away from peanut butter if you're allergic" is wanky.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-29 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-10-29 02:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-10-29 03:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 03:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ella_w, 2006-10-29 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thecheese, 2006-10-30 05:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 06:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ella_w, 2006-10-30 07:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vengeance_bean, 2006-10-29 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-10-29 02:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-10-29 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 03:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 04:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]majorburns, 2006-10-29 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-30 06:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]majorburns, 2006-10-31 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-31 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]southernbangel, 2006-10-29 04:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-10-29 05:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2006-10-29 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slackerbitch, 2006-10-29 04:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]southernbangel, 2006-10-29 04:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2006-10-29 07:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-29 07:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 08:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2006-10-29 02:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2006-10-30 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-10-29 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-10-29 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-10-30 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 10:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-30 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]felinephoenix, 2006-11-04 06:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-10-29 01:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]warrioreowyn, 2006-11-03 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vengeance_bean, 2006-11-03 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brown_betty, 2006-10-29 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-10-29 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]an_igor, 2006-10-29 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2006-10-29 07:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-29 08:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 08:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]majorburns, 2006-10-29 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-30 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vengeance_bean, 2006-10-30 11:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-10-30 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]an_igor, 2006-10-29 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-30 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2006-10-29 01:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-10-29 05:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-10-30 01:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]warrioreowyn, 2006-11-03 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2006-11-05 06:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sadisticferret, 2006-10-29 04:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 04:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]majorburns, 2006-10-29 06:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 07:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2006-10-29 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rekall, 2006-10-29 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]black_spot, 2006-11-01 07:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmdr_zoom, 2007-09-01 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-10-29 10:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]an_igor, 2006-10-29 03:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]emiweebee, 2006-10-29 05:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2006-10-29 06:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]warrioreowyn, 2006-11-03 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2006-11-03 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2006-11-04 07:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2006-10-29 05:54 pm UTC
like a dumbass news tease, in a way... - [info]majorburns, 2006-10-29 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2006-10-29 11:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]warrioreowyn, 2006-11-03 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]renata_hpjc, 2006-11-04 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2006-11-02 07:32 pm UTC


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map