Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Pan ([info]panthea) wrote in [info]wankitywank,
@ 2006-10-28 01:51:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:WTF?

"But maybe she shouldn't be having sex if it's life-threatening."
Fucksake, this hasn't even made it off [info]clairvoyantwank yet, and already the mice are bringing the HEADDESK.

Quick background: Biting Beaver had sex with her long-time male cohabitating personage. The condom broke. It took about three days before she found a place willing to give her EC. It didn't take. She had to get an abortion.

Oh, yeah: and HAVING ANOTHER CHILD COULD KILL HER.

We have: Snap judgments!
I don't know the background here, but why hasn't she gotten her tubes tied if another pregnancy could kill her? It just seems really irresponsible (to me) to rely on a condom alone in a situation like that.

Well-meaning advice!
But maybe she shouldn't be having sex if it's life-threatening.

Condescension ahoy!
There are plenty of ways to be sexually active with your partner that don't involve STICKING IT IN. For this woman, in her unique situation, sex is a very serious health risk that could KILL HER if she doesn't smarten up. Logically, she should either:

A) Avoid vaginal sex
-or-
B) Take extra steps to avoid getting pregnant

She's doing neither.


More-feminist-than-thou!
It was most likely a miscalculation on her part to continue that particular kind of penetrative sex at all. For a feminist who's supposed to be all in charge of her sexuality, she seems to have a limited idea about what constitutes letting her partner, "stick his dick in [her]." Whatever the case, I still stand by my original statement; Sodomy, yahy!

Is that BACKPEDALING I smell?
Nononononono! *backs away slowly* I'm not calling her a whore at all, I'm just saying that from reading her blog it seems she believes vaginal intercourse is the only viable form of penetration that she could achive in a sexual relationship. Really, I was advicating kinky sex and a more in-depth exploration of her sex and sexuality from a feminist POV. You know, turning tragedy into triumph and all that.

The moral of this story: if pregnancy could kill you, then no vaginal sex for you! Sodomy all the way!



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]iris
2006-10-28 07:03 am UTC (link)
That's a better response than I would've had! I think I would've been tempted to just punch her in the ovaries.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]heddychaa
2006-11-05 09:03 pm UTC (link)
I would have done it while screaming "SPONTANEOUS ABORTION!" at the top of my lungs, but that's just me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map