"But maybe she shouldn't be having sex if it's life-threatening."
Fucksake, this hasn't even made it off clairvoyantwank yet, and already the mice are bringing the HEADDESK.
Quick background: Biting Beaver had sex with her long-time male cohabitating personage. The condom broke. It took about three days before she found a place willing to give her EC. It didn't take. She had to get an abortion.
Oh, yeah: and HAVING ANOTHER CHILD COULD KILL HER.
We have: Snap judgments!
I don't know the background here, but why hasn't she gotten her tubes tied if another pregnancy could kill her? It just seems really irresponsible (to me) to rely on a condom alone in a situation like that.
But maybe she shouldn't be having sex if it's life-threatening.
There are plenty of ways to be sexually active with your partner that don't involve STICKING IT IN. For this woman, in her unique situation, sex is a very serious health risk that could KILL HER if she doesn't smarten up. Logically, she should either:
A) Avoid vaginal sex
B) Take extra steps to avoid getting pregnant
She's doing neither.
It was most likely a miscalculation on her part to continue that particular kind of penetrative sex at all. For a feminist who's supposed to be all in charge of her sexuality, she seems to have a limited idea about what constitutes letting her partner, "stick his dick in [her]." Whatever the case, I still stand by my original statement; Sodomy, yahy!
Is that BACKPEDALING I smell?
Nononononono! *backs away slowly* I'm not calling her a whore at all, I'm just saying that from reading her blog it seems she believes vaginal intercourse is the only viable form of penetration that she could achive in a sexual relationship. Really, I was advicating kinky sex and a more in-depth exploration of her sex and sexuality from a feminist POV. You know, turning tragedy into triumph and all that.
The moral of this story: if pregnancy could kill you, then no vaginal sex for you! Sodomy all the way!