Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



&laura; ([info]semtex) wrote in [info]wankitywank,
@ 2007-05-28 12:52:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*thud*

"You seem surprised I'm ranting on a ranting community. This is funny."
…No, no it's not. Really.


Author's Notes:
Okay guys, I think I should make myself really really clear. People aren't understanding this metawank report, and I haven't explained it well because I'm soft in the head like that. First, I wasn't sure about the wanky outcome, so I posted it to [info]clairvoyantwank. So now after editing the report and posting it here I wanted to point out that wanking is still going on, but because I'm poor at explaining it, I will leave it up to you to decide where it belongs, because...

This meta wank report is not meant to be a proper meta wank report. It doesn't follow the traditional structure of a wank report. This is because of my poor writing skills. What [info]cathowl is doing, is fapping with his imaginary toys and putting on a public masturbation show the likes you have never seen. Please, won't you watch [info]cathowl fap?

If the wank is going too slowly for you, [info]cathowl doesn't care. [info]cathowl can fap with his toys as fast or slowly as he likes until he is done getting off I also don't care if If you don't like the tone of my wank report because I am a special snowflake.

If you see lj tag errors, mispellings and/or text I am interrogating from the wrong perspective, feel free to point these out. I wouldn't want this report tarnished.

[info]nevadafighter, keep on fighting the good fight of gently pounding sense into fanbrats!
[info]ashenmote, thanks for pointing out that I may be a wee harsh on judging [info]cathowl for his waving an Asperger's flag of surrender!

Without further ado, let's get on with the wank.


[info]cathowl posts a tl;dr frothing rant about ff.nets's rules oppreshun on [info]fandom_rant. At first the reaction is lukewarm bemusement and a passing mention of rules.
Somewhere along the line things take a slightly wanktastic detour, mostly due to [info]cathowl suffering a mildly toxic case of Just Not Getting It:
[info]pyratejenni asks [info]cathowl if he will post again when ff.net boots him off for not following "their ridiculous totalitarian rules".
[info]nevadafighter points out that the OP has mistaken [info]fandom_rant for some other community.
Finally, [info]esorlehcar would rather not have [info]fandom_rant be the dumping grounds of entitlement ragewhen a user is caught breaking rules.
[info]onaga finally points out that the OP may have meant to post this in [info]fanficrants.

I'm wondering if this will peter off or grow into a full blown case of flounce disease, myself. Good times. All that is missing is "Do you get the point of this community at all?!?!" to complete this teeny tiny circle of wank.

[ETA for great justice:]

Author's notes in question are here

Finishing Move! While eventually adopting a more reasonable tone, [info]cathowl pulls the Asperger's card Oh, [info]cathowl why? You were almost done mopping up after yourself.



(Post a new comment)

boatload of *headdesk*
[info]sashenka
2007-05-28 08:09 pm UTC (link)
ZOMG I need to explain my writing because it isn't clear and it takes longer than the original writing to explain what I was trying to convey! WAH!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: boatload of *headdesk*
[info]semtex
2007-05-28 08:17 pm UTC (link)
I think it's more he wanted to give shout outs to fans? I think?
Anyway, maybe it's different when you post fanart, because most of my artist's notes consist of:

"Here. This is [so-and-so pairing or individual ]. Try not to break your brain. Enjoy."

I find this simple and short, not like some asspile of tl;dr.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]sashenka, 2007-05-28 08:20 pm UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 09:44 pm UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]omega, 2007-05-28 10:04 pm UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]pyratejenni, 2007-05-28 11:06 pm UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]semtex, 2007-05-29 01:18 am UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]singe, 2007-05-29 06:53 pm UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]sashenka, 2007-05-29 12:33 am UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]mistal, 2007-05-29 04:34 am UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk* - [info]onaga, 2007-05-29 04:46 am UTC
Re: boatload of *headdesk*
[info]limyaael
2007-05-28 08:21 pm UTC (link)
Why can't he just clarify it in-story? Have a character in the next chapter remark on something potentially unclear in more detail?

Perhaps this is too non-rebellious for him.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ladybirdsleeps
2007-05-28 08:20 pm UTC (link)
I just promised God that if cathowl posts that to Fanficrants, I won't look at porn for a week. That's how much I want it to happen.

A whole week.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-05-28 08:38 pm UTC (link)
*hopes along with you*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tez
2007-05-28 08:43 pm UTC (link)
Seconding this. Bigtime.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]azazello, 2007-05-28 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 09:05 pm UTC
Oh damn. - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 09:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2007-05-28 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2007-05-28 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]expeliarbum, 2007-05-28 10:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalicephirot, 2007-05-29 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]greypearl, 2007-05-29 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalicephirot, 2007-05-29 07:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]greypearl, 2007-05-29 09:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kalicephirot, 2007-05-29 09:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faultypremise, 2007-05-29 04:35 am UTC

[info]ereshkigal
2007-05-28 08:21 pm UTC (link)
Awww, aren't they a speshul little snowflake~

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tiye, 2007-05-30 01:33 am UTC

[info]doomsday
2007-05-28 08:26 pm UTC (link)
I'm having a grand ol' time looking at his "story" (it's not really a story, it's his toy that he plays with and spews onto ff.net. Or something. I couldn't manage to actually get through the A/Ns).

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - verthandi, 2007-05-28 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mousy_345e4, 2007-05-29 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2007-05-29 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mousy_345e4, 2007-05-29 04:10 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-05-28 09:26 pm UTC
OIC now. - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 09:38 pm UTC
Re: OIC now. - [info]seraphtrevs, 2007-05-28 11:27 pm UTC
Re: OIC now. - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jetamors, 2007-05-28 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gun, 2007-05-28 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2007-05-28 10:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2007-05-29 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]agent_hyatt, 2007-05-29 01:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2007-05-29 03:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2007-05-28 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zaliesiren, 2007-05-28 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ara, 2007-05-29 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzybluelogic, 2007-05-29 05:42 pm UTC

[info]harrylovesron
2007-05-28 08:40 pm UTC (link)
I like how he knows he's violating FFnet's TOS with the long-ass author's notes, yet gets angry because someone's called him out on it and has sworn to keep making socks and putting it back up if he gets kicked off.

(Reply to this)


[info]snacky
2007-05-28 08:47 pm UTC (link)
Poor cathowl. He keeps saying he's not a whiny entitled fanbrat, but with every single comment he makes, he just keeps digging that hole deeper.

(Reply to this)


[info]tehrin
2007-05-28 08:55 pm UTC (link)
How was he not aware fanfic rants existed? I've seen him on a few wank communities. And, let's face the obvious, FFR is a rather wanky little bunch.

(Reply to this)


[info]gun
2007-05-28 08:55 pm UTC (link)
I really think someone should write up an extended author's note for this entry, responding to everyone who has been mean enough to tell cathowl to stfu.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]alya1989262, 2007-05-28 09:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 10:22 pm UTC

[info]stella_polaris
2007-05-28 09:09 pm UTC (link)
Hands up, who didn't guess it was gonna end up here?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]varkias, 2007-05-29 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-05-29 01:19 pm UTC

[info]luckdragonfujur
2007-05-28 09:16 pm UTC (link)
But people LIKES his author notes! Why can't you understand it, you TOS-following haters! Dx

(Reply to this)


[info]rotten_fish
2007-05-28 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Don't like me, do you.

Nobody likes you, incest boy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-28 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2007-05-28 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-28 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2007-05-28 10:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2007-05-28 10:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2007-05-28 10:38 pm UTC
WAIT. - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 10:48 pm UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]white_serpent, 2007-05-28 11:02 pm UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 11:50 pm UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]onaga, 2007-05-29 12:53 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-29 02:53 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]amxjm, 2007-05-29 03:12 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]mmanurere, 2007-05-29 03:35 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-29 04:06 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]amxjm, 2007-05-30 03:54 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]amxjm, 2007-05-29 04:31 am UTC
Re: WAIT. - [info]rotten_fish, 2007-05-29 02:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-28 11:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2007-05-29 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2007-05-29 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2007-05-29 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 10:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doomsday, 2007-05-28 10:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2007-05-29 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alya1989262, 2007-05-28 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rotten_fish, 2007-05-29 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alya1989262, 2007-05-29 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sugartits, 2007-05-28 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-05-28 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stella_polaris, 2007-05-28 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-05-28 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2007-05-29 02:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2007-05-29 12:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]expeliarbum, 2007-05-29 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2007-05-29 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-05-29 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-29 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-05-29 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2007-05-29 04:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mochibuni, 2007-05-29 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]annabelle_lee, 2007-05-29 04:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-05-29 07:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oh_envy, 2007-05-29 09:14 am UTC
Ooooh thoughts on incest... - [info]birene, 2007-05-29 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-05-29 11:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-05-29 02:02 pm UTC

[info]soupspooks
2007-05-28 10:03 pm UTC (link)
Actually, there's a ffdotnetrants (I think?) on LiveJournal for specific ff.net related rants, even if people keep posting them to FFR, resulting in much eye-rolling.

(Reply to this)


[info]ashenmote
2007-05-28 11:16 pm UTC (link)
Best not to loose a word about his earlier comments or the post itself, but I think it's perfectly acceptable to bring up Asberger's the way he did there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2007-05-28 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]semtex, 2007-05-28 11:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shakeandbake, 2007-05-29 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-29 02:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2007-05-29 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-05-29 08:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2007-05-29 08:18 pm UTC

[info]joye
2007-05-28 11:51 pm UTC (link)
I'm pretentious? Me?
Surely you jest! *throws pastel scarf over shoulder, huffs*

(Reply to this)


[info]jat_sapphire
2007-05-29 02:23 am UTC (link)
I just found out SO much more about cathowl than I ever, ever wanted to.

(Reply to this)


[info]xero_sky
2007-05-29 02:57 am UTC (link)
I know it's against their ridiculous totalitarian rules.

I want to mock, yet this was probably me a few years ago when the Pit axed all the NC-17 fics. OMG! Oppreshun! Injustice!

Lack of perspective = fail

So I guess I'll just cringe a bit instead.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sashenka, 2007-05-29 03:07 am UTC
I love the author's notes on this report.
iwanttobeasleep
2007-05-29 03:19 am UTC (link)
He's a member of Fandom_wank but he doesn't know about FFR?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I love the author's notes on this report. - [info]tehrin, 2007-05-29 04:36 am UTC
Re: I love the author's notes on this report. - [info]semtex, 2007-05-29 06:31 am UTC

[info]varkias
2007-05-29 05:39 am UTC (link)
Good fucking god almighty. I actually went and looked at his A/N's in the link there, and....wow. The ones at the top are bad enough, but the ones at the end? Holy shit. The actual 'chapter' is less than half of the page. Maybe a lot less. *eyes it*

...Okay so I went and did a word count on it. It IS less than half. The A/Ns are longer than the story (over 3000 words). But not by as much as I was thinking.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

This is me going D: - [info]semtex, 2007-05-29 06:29 am UTC
Re: This is me going D: - [info]varkias, 2007-05-29 06:32 am UTC
Re: This is me going D: - [info]semtex, 2007-05-29 06:45 am UTC
Re: This is me going D: - [info]varkias, 2007-05-29 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-05-29 07:13 am UTC

[info]cathowl
2007-05-29 07:24 am UTC (link)
*Sigh*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hristaesir, 2007-05-29 08:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-05-29 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hristaesir, 2007-05-29 08:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2007-05-29 10:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]verpon, 2007-05-29 10:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2007-05-29 03:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-05-29 04:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-05-29 04:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-05-29 06:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-05-29 07:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cathowl, 2007-05-29 08:02 pm UTC

[info]keleri
2007-05-29 04:56 pm UTC (link)
I felt bad, because I kind of sympathized with the rant, but then in the comments the hole just grew deeper and deeper. Ah well.

(Reply to this)


[info]anonyrat
2007-05-29 09:40 pm UTC (link)
I'm well aware that not all young girls are stupid, as my valedictorian female friend demonstrates.

Some of my best friends are smart teenage girls!

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map