Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Goblin: Just Another Internet Asshole ([info]_goblin_) wrote in [info]wankitywank,
@ 2009-09-01 17:02:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
WAAAAAHH on Wank_Report
On 2009-08-30, at 06:48 am UTC, an anonymouse posts what is essentially a clairvoyant wank about the Supernatural fandom on [info]wank_report.

On the same day, at 07:56 am UTC--which is before that post had even a single reply to it--someone on [info]spn_gossip posts about the post on wank_report. Gee, I wonder how that anon spotted it sooooo fast...

Surprise! Suddenly, that thread on wank_report is full of traffic, much of which has obviously just parachuted in from the SPN fandom.

The second comment on the original wank_report thread is notable for reasons that will become apparent. A mousie suggests people from wank_report are trolling the wank at spn_gossip.

To be fair, there is one mousie who admits to trolling the wank.

A(nother?) mousie posts later to again insinuate that the trolling is due to wankas from wank_report. As opposed to SPNers from the SPN thread. Where the wanking is actually going on. And who were, y'know, linked to wank_report half an hour before the original post had any replies.

A whole new thread is started on the wank_report! It's entitled: "Suggestion". The OP mousie asks that wank_report institute a rule against reporting on wanks that occur in anonymous communities such as spn_gossip. The logic is that no one can tell if wankas are trolling the wank in an anonymous community.

That peters out, but lo! Another whole new thread is started on the wank_report! It's entitled: "BAN REPORTS OF SPN_GOSSIP". It features some mousies saying the trolls were from the SPN fandom to begin with, and some mousies saying the trolls came from wank_report.

There may be further developments on this one; I'll keep you posted. In the meanwhile, however, I gently remind everyone that just because wank_report is ours, that doesn't make it cool to go over there and leave comments, now that this has been posted here.

You may either continue in the discussion there (and risk being mocked as a wanker) OR laugh at teh funneh right here, but doing both would be trolling the wank. Be good, sweet wankas.


(Post a new comment)


[info]wallflower
2009-09-02 02:18 am UTC (link)
I looked at the picture it the first link and immediately thought, "I bet Misha is trolling fandom again."

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]deliciouschaos
2009-09-02 02:27 am UTC (link)
"Hey, man, can I borrow your ring for a bit? Trust me, it'll be epic."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]syldana
2009-09-02 02:38 am UTC (link)
LOL! This was exactly my thought, as well.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bride_of_lister
2009-09-02 03:08 am UTC (link)
I had to run off and look at his Twitter. He's asking all that are attending to bring a pen, a piece of black construction paper, and an egg for the mind-control experiment. I think that the mind control experiment is exactly how many bring those items and present them to him.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2009-09-02 03:16 am UTC (link)
I agree.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]fools_game, 2009-09-02 09:02 am UTC

[info]frequentmouse
2009-09-02 04:22 am UTC (link)
That's been the consensus at my home posting board; even non SPN fen are fascinated by Mr. Collins' ability to cause tinhat insanity by his smallest gestures at cons.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wallflower, 2009-09-02 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2009-09-05 08:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-11 05:53 pm UTC

[info]finchbird
2009-09-02 06:30 am UTC (link)
It wouldn't surprise me. That man is a gift for us wankas.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]feenix
2009-09-02 02:42 am UTC (link)
Things I have learned:

Dismissing rumors that you (who is an ostensibly heterosexual male) are shtupping your (ostensibly heterosexual) male co-star (who plays your brother) as batshit (because you both have girlfriends IIRC) = HOMOPHOBIA ZOMG

I mean, it's Hollywood, but not every chick is a beard.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kylenne
2009-09-02 02:45 am UTC (link)
I loved when the one mouse busted out with the list of 100% Straight Guys and Anderson Cooper was on it.

...I think that mouse might actually be my mom, since she may be the last one to know about Coop.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-02 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2009-09-02 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wallflower, 2009-09-02 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bride_of_lister, 2009-09-02 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kylenne, 2009-09-02 04:05 am UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2009-09-02 04:11 am UTC (link)
This was a cherished Domlijah tinhat credo, too. Either they're madly in love with each other and fucking like bunnies, or they're huge homophobes who have been playing with us for their own amusement. Those are the only two choices. For whatever reason, it's always completely inconceivable that they could just be good friends behaving like good friends.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2009-09-02 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meagenimage, 2009-09-02 02:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-09-03 04:59 am UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2009-09-02 04:15 am UTC (link)
ahahahahahahaha, I missed this: The slight is perceived because it's there, you fucking bigot.

I'd say this has to be a troll, but these are the people who think an actor denying being a fan-invented relationship with his costar qualifies as homophobic, so it's probably 100% serious.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]trout
2009-09-02 10:25 am UTC (link)
I love this explanation so much.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - tetradecimal, 2009-09-03 02:48 am UTC

[info]phosfate
2009-09-02 02:59 am UTC (link)
What?

No. Wait. I think I've got -- no, what?

Someone is complaining about trolling on an anon comm?

...what?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snacky
2009-09-02 03:31 am UTC (link)
One anon comm complaining about being trolled by ANOTHER anon comm!

I still can't wrap my head around the logic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2009-09-03 04:58 am UTC

[info]witty
2009-09-02 03:45 am UTC (link)
Okay, my favorite was the mousie who ended with, "OMG, Mom??"

(Reply to this)


[info]senor_pinata
2009-09-02 04:04 am UTC (link)
Several people lurk there (and here) who don't have journalfen accounts who may troll wanks irregardless of whatever FW or WankReport does.

IRREGARDLESS ISN'T A WORD

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phasmas
2009-09-02 04:36 am UTC (link)
Actually, it is.</i> It's still very little-used and awkward as hell, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2009-09-02 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bride_of_lister, 2009-09-02 04:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2009-09-02 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-09-02 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2009-09-02 04:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-09-02 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2009-09-02 12:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2009-09-02 10:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2009-09-02 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-09-02 04:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2009-09-02 04:58 am UTC

[info]calatha
2009-09-02 09:46 am UTC (link)
My mother (who was the biggest grammar nazi who ever lived) backs you up completely. That was a huge pet peeve of hers. Along with the proper usage of 'further' and 'farther.'

Her opinion completely overrules Merriam-Webster.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lied_ohne_worte, 2009-09-02 05:29 pm UTC

[info]tangentialone
2009-09-02 06:17 am UTC (link)
The logic is that no one can tell if wankas are trolling the wank in an anonymous community.

What they say is true!

But, generally no one can tell if wankas are trolling the wank anyway unless they actually use the same name in both places or say, "Lol I was just over there trolling it", or unless people go to the trouble of comparing IP addresses.

(Reply to this)


[info]karmyn75
2009-09-02 11:47 am UTC (link)
I'm a non-slash fan of SPN. Do I exist or not?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]reeve
2009-09-02 01:35 pm UTC (link)
Get back in the corner with the english majors, bisexuals, and girl gamers!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]karmyn75, 2009-09-02 03:28 pm UTC

tetradecimal
2009-09-03 02:34 am UTC (link)
Sigh. Oh, wank_report. Maybe there's something in the water this week.

Abortion/creationism/the fanfic survey/asexuals/slapping children? Yeesh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]_goblin_
2009-09-03 04:46 am UTC (link)
I'm posting wanks out of pure desperation. I hope things pick up once school starts in earnest. How dare wankers take summer vacation!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]magnolia_mama
2009-09-03 03:56 pm UTC (link)
I thought the anon who completely missed the pun about Picts was hilarious, but that's not a wank, just someone looking foolish on the Internet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]_goblin_, 2009-09-03 04:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_ganesh, 2009-09-11 05:54 pm UTC

[info]beejium
2009-09-04 04:01 am UTC (link)
I sooo wish that the Doctor Who forum was open to anyone. There's a brilliant wank going on there now.

Then again, there's always wank in Doctor Who.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]alienist, 2009-09-23 04:49 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map