|
|
insignificant other (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} snacky) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} wankitywank,@ 2009-09-29 15:45:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Mod Post
The last post, referencing the ONTD/Eli Roth wank on FW, was deleted.
Reason: The post linked to the content of a flocked (ONTD) post. The poster did not edit this link out after being called on it by a mod, so the post was deleted.
Confusion may arise here, my little wankas! The thing is, it's a Journalfen rule not to repost/reproduce the content of flocked posts. However, FW does allow you to link to these locked posts, if the community has open membership, i.e., anyone can join to see the post. I should note that it's polite to clarify this point in your post, if you care about such things.
The fandom_wank rules, on our profile page, have been updated, to hopefully clarify this situation.
Sorry to everyone who enjoys in-house wank.
The last post, referencing the ONTD/Eli Roth wank on FW, was deleted.
Reason: The post linked to the content of a flocked (ONTD) post. The poster did not edit this link out after being called on it by a mod, so the post was deleted.
Confusion may arise here, my little wankas! The thing is, it's a Journalfen rule not to repost/reproduce the content of flocked posts. However, FW does allow you to link to these locked posts, if the community has open membership, i.e., anyone can join to see the post. I should note that it's polite to clarify this point in your post, if you care about such things.
The fandom_wank rules, on our profile page, have been updated, to hopefully clarify this situation.
Sorry to everyone who enjoys in-house wank.
Post a comment in response:
