It's not a reasonable question, and when the president of a preeminent institution of learning makes stupid comments implying women aren't as good as men at a conference on diversity in the sciences, he should know what's coming (and he plainly did, with his disclaimers about provoking the audience). Frankly, I'm surprised that he didn't include a quaint anecdote about how girls like Easy-Bake Ovens and excel at home economics, even if they suck at regular, manly-man economics. But implying that girls are bad at maths and sciences based on flimsy (at best) scientific evidence and personal observation is bullshit, and there doesn't need to be a conspiracy of the intelligentsia to kick his ass out the door. (Honestly, university professors are too busy fighting amongst themselves to engage in conspiracy. A casual lunch is fraught with complex status issues; any discussion is likely as not to be gossip about so-and-so's doctoral students, how much the dean sucks, why the new department secretary isn't as good as the old department secretary, and how ridiculous all the university's policies are. Any conspiracy will be dedicated solely to stealing someone else's research, or possibly pinching a promising postdoc.)
And yet I still watch Morning Joe, even though I end up in frothy rage, wanting to throw things at the TV.
(I have no real opinion on Summers' possible appointment as Treasury Secretary, because I don't know what his qualifications are and I don't really care; if he can get the economy out of the tank I will take a slightly misogynist jerk, so long as he isn't in charge of HR. I will feel slightly less warm and fuzzy about Obama, though.)