Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Charmian ([info]charmian) wrote,
@ 2008-12-26 03:45:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Note, before you click this, watch out, because it contains a LOT of NSFW images. I turned images off, because I just don't want to have to load that many.

http://bradhanon.livejournal.com/789.html?thread=52501#t52501

In general, I just ignored this discussion, because a) am not as interested in visual art, more into fandom in general for the stories, and b) most of the outrage seemed to stem from who the poster was (a male) than from what he was saying. Disliking someone's arguments based on who they are is ad hominem, and IMHO there have been a lot of female persons in fandom who have made all kinds of ridiculous arguments about 'all women believe this or want this' for me to think that it's just men who do this. (Which is not to say that I agree with Bradhanon. I think some good arguments have been made against his ideas, especially those which claim that slash fandom cannot be argued to be representative of 'women,' meaning that it cannot be argued that it is equivalent to the so-called 'Male Gaze.' And anyway, if Bradhanon doesn't really understand what it is, it is mistaken for him to write about it)

And also, WTF? Helloooooo there is INDEED A PAYING MARKET FOR M/M WORKS AIMED AT WOMEN, mostly in ebooks. It is ridiculous for people to behave as if m/m works aimed at women are owned only by fanfic writers, or should always be that way.

Frankly, it comes off as if they made mistakes out of ignorance, and notrafficlights, IMHO, is not speaking for the entire fandom(s) and should stop acting like she is. Also, she does not speak for all fans when she claims that fandom is opposed to capitalism.

Also: "And if I think any of it is worth it I'll be more than happy to steal it off the various pirate comms I am a part of on LJ and many other forums on the internet. :) Seriously, why would I give any ignorant money grabbing lying capitalist any of my hard-earned cash? Especially when they've still got so much to apologise for?"

Wow. It is interesting that even though all of the people involved in this endeavor, except for bradhanon are women, notrafficlights seems to believe that it is a good idea that any attempts to make money out of m/m for women be sabotaged. So.... does anyone remember that post that was written awhile back about how fanfic makes women poor? XD Well, certainly m/m will never make anyone a red cent if people feel that they should never, ever pay for it. Man, no one had better tell notrafficlights about the BL sector of the manga industry. That shows that even though doujinshi can be had, and online fanworks, people will STILL pay for m/m works.

(So now capitalist=anyone who wishes to make money off of their labor, or anyone who wishes to start a business?)


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: on a slight tangent
[info]charmian
2008-12-26 07:50 am UTC (link)
Wait, and I thought people were complaining that the mainstream money-grubbing capitalist market ignores them? Like 'such and such showrunner doesn't think women are watching this show' or 'such and such folk don't think that a show with lesbians/gays will sell.'

Frankly, that attitude just really... FRUSTRATES me about fandom. Maybe it's because when you come from a different fandom, who is 'outsider' and who is 'insider' get blurred.

Well... I personally don't think someone who is getting paid a fair rate is exploited? Nor is someone who buys a producted necessarily exploited.

In some ways, that is what I was wondering... they're not threatening to get rid of the free stuff, so...

Well, in a way, I guess I COULD see that fear. If we had a really robust m/m market, some of the popular fanwriters might want to go pro (in fanfic writer land, there are two groups, one who are in it for the show, and one who are in it for the audience. If the latter group could leave fandom, write whatever they want, and still have an audience/community?), and then they would stop producing free work. So, the average quality of the free stuff would go down, and 'm/m for women' fandom would become more like SFF online fandom and romance novel fandom, with more of a pro atmosphere.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: on a slight tangent
[info]white_serpent
2008-12-26 07:59 am UTC (link)
Wait, and I thought people were complaining that the mainstream money-grubbing capitalist market ignores them? Like 'such and such showrunner doesn't think women are watching this show' or 'such and such folk don't think that a show with lesbians/gays will sell.'

Right. Fandom excels at contradictions.

'm/m for women' fandom would become more like SFF online fandom and romance novel fandom, with more of a pro atmosphere.

They seem not to be considering how damned hard it is to find the good writers in fandom. Or the fact that when writers aren't receiving any compensation for writing, many of them don't have motivation to fit writing in around everything else they're doing. So, some of the good writers would be easier to find, and they might produce more.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: on a slight tangent
[info]charmian
2008-12-26 08:47 am UTC (link)
Indeed they do...

Apparently so. But yeah, that is one of the justifications for copyright law, that bragging rights, feedback, and community are "not enough" to spur the creation of works. So I think that is something to also take into consideration. Of course though, this might be sort of a taboo in fandom? To acknowledge that it is difficult to find the good writers ("what do you mean the reccing system isn't good enough?") or there writers might be more motivated to produce if given filthy lucre ("what do you mean that the adulation of fans and feedback isn't enough?!")

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map