| |
[Jul. 24th, 2008|03:49 pm] |
Hey, you know how crazy I feel these days? I'm tempted to start up a fandom wiki (which would be completely free and super easy, by the way, aside from writing the entries themselves; I have a couple of my own that I play around with for my writing) and just be like, "You know what? Comment if you want to participate so at least I know you're not a bot or a troll, but otherwise, have at it. We'll pick admins later. HERE'S A WIKI THAT'S NOT FOR PROFIT." Call it "Panfandom" or something, I don't know. Just because I feel contrary.
ETA: Because I'm out of my mind: http://panfandom.pbwiki.com
I don't really care about being the Holy Writ of Fandom, so basically, I just want a nice fun wiki like the FW Wiki or TV Tropes, and after a little while, maybe see who's into it and pick some admins to keep people from being complete jerkwads, but other than that, I don't care. If there are "controversial" subjects, I am fully okay with having multiple entries from different "biases" linked from a primary entry. Seriously, I don't care. If it turns into srs bsns, ur doin it wrong.
Also, I'm perfectly okay with super-short summaries that link to the FW Wiki for wank entries where clearly FWW has already covered it better. I don't give a shit about "notability" in the Wikipedia sense, so if someone wants a page about something, as long as they don't spam or link it in random entries, I don't care. As far as I'm concerned, I am this wiki's god until further notice, but this wiki's god is a lazy god, so it shouldn't be that big a deal. |
|
|
| Comments: |
Heh. Well, I'm of the mind that the intertubes are always in need of wikis (and other stuff) that aren't run by psycho douches, so I don't really see a problem with this. ;)
Hmm. Well, the problem I'm seeing is that the mischievity has passed and now I feel lazy again. But in general, yeah, not a problem. : )
I can hook you up with somebody who's been doing stuff on the other one, and is currently rather upset about the whole business. Guaranteed not a douche, and has documentation for her posts.
You mean on The Wiki in Question? (Not, like, another free wiki.) Hey, hook me up. I've got enough on my plate that I'm wondering if I should be heavily involved in this, but I might be a good coordinator/mod.
Groovy. I'll point her over here.
Also: ASK YOURSELF WHAT KIND OF WIKI YOU WANT YOUR KIDS TO GROW UP AROUND!
I would love you forever and possibly even edit stuff.
I don't know what I have to do to allow you to post--usually wikis I faff around with are just for me, so we'll be figuring that out.
Yeah, it says to comment on the main page, but uh, I don't have permission? LOL! And when I try to look at your profile it says to login even though I am logged in. *is confused* I'm Meimi over there, btw.
Yeah, it was being a douche to me, too. Do you have a separate login for your email, or is it dependent on a specific wiki you've already created? Because I have, like, eight writing project wikis, and it still made me create a "new" email/username account, even though it said I was logged in. Apparently they do shit new over there now or something.
Meimi's the username? Let me see if I can invite you.
Ah, there we go. Success. :D It couldn't be a douche forever. FYI, I'm gonna delete my last comment since it's got my email address in it.
I think that would be a good idea, indeed.
Oh sure, I'm in if you are
![[User Picture]](http://www.journalfen.net/userpic/139052/10331) | From: ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) ringbark
2008-07-28 07:26 am (UTC)
Include me in, please | (Link)
|
I don't think I'm a troll. At least, not last time I looked.
I just sent you an application request. | |
