| Another pre-trial update |
[Apr. 13th, 2008|01:22 pm] |
'Potter' author seeks to block fan book. "In court Friday, Hammer said Rowling's lawyers did not want Vander Ark in the courtroom while Rowling testifies." |
|
|
| |
[Apr. 11th, 2008|08:29 pm] |
Re: Lexicongate: There's actually some interesting things going on with some new documents at Justia, but I'm holding off on posting anything new until the trial starts on Monday anyway, lest I wear out the last shred of welcome I've got left. |
|
|
| |
[Mar. 1st, 2008|08:03 am] |
Newest ETA: Nora Roberts weighs in. |
|
|
| |
[Feb. 29th, 2008|05:56 pm] |
Newest ETA: RDR Books updates its site; SVA is like Moses, in a way. |
|
|
| |
[Feb. 16th, 2008|03:28 pm] |
So... uh... I was going back and tagging the "Hey, I updated the Lexicon" entries and apparently JF didn't send me comment notifications, because I found some comments I'd never seen. Including this one:
LOL ZERO CHANCE OF BEING UNSCREENED! [Note: I had screening on to grab pharmaceutical spam comments, which I used to get a lot. I've unscreened the comment because I wouldn't have screened it in the first place if not for auto-spam-screening. Also: "screen" no longer looks like a word.]
Dear Cleolinda,
It's majorly embarrassment squicky to see you using the word "kerfluffle" instead of kerfuffle. It smacks of you sucking up to the fandom_wank (internet-bullying) cabal, of which you're a part,(http://www.greatestjournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=mockitymock&mode=full) which is obviously what you're trying to do.
Aren't you better than hanging around with and sucking up to internet bullies by now? Have I judged you wrong all along? Maybe. I've had the horrible feeling that you are an internet bully for a long time but I've been mainly pushing it away for just as long.
~a very occasional reader who's hoping you'll get better.
1) There you go; you've had your airtime.
2) Wha? |
|
|
| |
[Feb. 12th, 2008|04:58 pm] |
ETA 5: Leaky/Lexicon drama. |
|
|
| |
[Feb. 7th, 2008|02:40 am] |
New ETA on the latest Lexicon entry, in which SVA writes to a fanzine to defend the book and basically says that the book's legal because it's not as good as the website. Wha? |
|
|
| Lexicongate, again |
[Jan. 24th, 2008|02:24 pm] |
I didn't want to put up a whole new entry, but ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif) auralan found a pretty big burn in the new amended complaint (last ETA). |
|
|
| |
[Nov. 26th, 2007|05:08 pm] |
Wank Report Takes Manhattan, ETA 3: "2 battling 'Harry Potter' author to speak in Grand Rapids" to "discuss 'the David and Goliath legal battle that this case entails.' " |
|
|