http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/ We mock each case objectively. - JournalFen Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:10:03 GMT LiveJournal / JournalFen dax_069 personal http://www.journalfen.net/userpic/88081/818 http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/ 100 100 http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/10613.html Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:10:03 GMT http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/10613.html Correct me if I'm wrong but <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/community/dominic_daily/66638.html">this picture</a> is the picture that <span class='ljuser' lj:user='cesare' style='white-space: nowrap;'><a href='http://www.journalfen.net/users/cesare/profile'><img src='http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif' alt='[info]' width='17' height='17' style='vertical-align: bottom; border: 0; padding-right: 1px;' /></a><a href='http://www.journalfen.net/users/cesare/'><b>cesare</b></a></span> detagged and not the actual version (<font size="1">it's not sad that i can notice that so easily, honest!</font>)... so her claim that a 'dear friend' of hers works for getty, took the original and gave it to her? hah.<br /><br />Also, <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/community/dominic_daily/66270.html?#cutid1">here</a>, she says she <i>took some of the photos herself</i> but can't reveal who she works for.<br /><br />Hmm, it just seems a little asshattish to take the real detagged images (that someone else got for you), turn them into photos and then claim you took them yourself. http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/10613.html The Used - Noise and Kisses irate public http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/7043.html Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:28:01 GMT http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/7043.html Add me and I'll add you back. http://www.journalfen.net/users/dax_069/7043.html public