Leviathan's Other Other Boring Sorta Back-Up Blog

First they came for LJ....

Journal Info

Name
leviathan0999

View

Navigation

January 1st, 2020

Random Comment Aggregator

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
If you have a need to leave me a comment that is not specifically related to a post you see below, just comment on this post. Leave comments, ask questions, post links, whatever.

Enjoy!

May 30th, 2013

When Daleks Flirt

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
...it's not a pretty sight, I must say!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xHj1U-zW6k

May 24th, 2013

"True, True Colors"

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

TRUE, TRUE COLORS

 

“Just what color is this thing, anyway?” groused Alexander Scott.

“They’re supposed to be people-colored,” replied Kelly Robinson.

“Not for colored people,” grumbled Scotty.

Kelly paused with the generic Mammoth-Mart brand bandage dangling from his hand, and looked at the two others already covering cuts on his forearm. They were a bit pale against his tanned skin, but not terribly noticeable.

Scotty eyed him sourly, the beige-cream rectangles standing out on his forehead like glowing signposts.

“I thought we weren’t supposed to say ‘colored people’ anymore.”

“Well, if it’s good enough for the National Association For The Advancement Of, it’s good enough for me.”

Kelly looked back at the blood seeping from his forearm, and his own only-slightly pale oblongs, and wrinkled his brow in disgust. “Barbed wire, man. What’s the point of that? I ask you, who puts barbed wire around a secure, secret compound?”

“Pretty much everybody with a secure, secret compound. You going to put your flesh tone adhesive bandage on that, or aren’t you?”

“Man, it isn’t ‘Flesh Tone.’” Kelly eyed it dubiously. “It’s, like, I dunno, Bisque. It’s undercooked muffin tone.

“As opposed to your blood, which is bright red, which, you see, isn’t that good a look on your brand new white jeans. How much do you pay for those, anyway?”

Kelly scoffed, “I’ll put ‘em on the expense report.”

“Well, sure you will,” said Scotty, skeptically, “because Shelly Clavell is always an easy touch for that sort of thing, right?”

Kelly looked again at his arm, again at Scotty’s face and his arms, and threw the pale, limp bandage to the floor. It flipped and wrapped around itself on the way down, like a minnow thrown from a bucket, and landed in a sticky ball, stuck to the side of the bedspread. “Hell with this, man,” he said, and stood up while Scotty’s eyes widened. “I’ll be right back.”


In the back of the Southwestern Bell repair truck, Russell Gabriel Conway shook his head slowly, taking in the naughty-little-boy grins of his two best agents.

“You understand, don’t you, that spies are supposed to be sort of, I dunno, unobtrusive? Nondescript, there’s another good word. That’s what spies are supposed to be, isn’t it?”

“Well, Gabe,” murmured Kelly, “there turn out to be some problems with that.”

Go into any damn drug store! Go into any damn drug store!” He always promised himself he was going to keep his temper with these two, two men who had brought him success after success, two men he loved as much as the son who was currently attending West Point. Some promises were not meant to be kept. “Shelf after shelf of perfectly ordinary Band-Aids!

“They’re the wrong color, Gabe.”

Kelly was the only one who called him ‘Gabe.’ But Russell Gabriel knew how the name ‘Russ’ hurt him, so he let that pass.

“They’re flesh-tone! It says it right on the box!”

Kelly looked steadily back at him. “Your flesh, maybe, Mr. Desk Man. Almost mine.” He paused. “Not his.”

Scotty just smiled mildly at him, enjoying Kelly too much to bring anything like reason to the conversation.

“For God’s sake...” Conway began, and then trailed off. With those pale-beige drug-store rectangles all over Alexander Scott’s face, he would have been every bit as spectacular as both men were now, and far less amusing. “Fine,” he finally said. “Fine. We’ll bring in another team for this part. Just... Just, go somewhere. Get the hell out of here.”

“Shall we, Hoby?” said Scotty, his smile widening.

“I think we shall, Fred C.” replied Kelly, and they stood, ducking the low roof of the phone-company truck.

Russ Conway looked back and forth from man to man, face to face, each criss-crossed with multicolored, goddamned-hippy-approved psychedelic, mock-tie-dyed plastic Band-Aids.

“And next time,” he bellowed after them as they ducked out the back doors, “stay away from the goddamned barbed wire!

 

THE END

May 12th, 2013

http://leviathan0999.dreamwidth.org/143177.html

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Oh, sweet Jesus, you guys, I can't even....



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaOC9danxNo


April 20th, 2013

A few words about "Boston Liberals," Civil Rights, Lockdowns, and Cowering.

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
I've heard a few folks, both individuals and opinion journalists, talk about yesterday's "Lockdown" in Boston as a "surrender to fear" or "bowing to terrorism." The premise seems to be that Bostonians surrendered their civil rights, letting our authorities give us orders far beyond their authority, and thereby, terrorism was effective.

No. Bostonians are a tough, smart, practical people. We don't flinch from tough choices, and when it's needed, we roll up our sleeves and tackle unpleasant tasks. Our law enforcers needed room to work, and to mobilize in a big way to capture a uniquely dangerous criminal, and the best way for them to do that was with the particular cooperation of the citizens. What Bostonians needed to do to see the situation resolved was sit out a day, and stay where they were, to give the authorities a clear field. They made that choice willingly and in good faith, and the state met that good faith by keeping faith with them. They took the day of unprecedented cooperation and the clear field the citizens gave them, and at the end of the day, when they had not been successful, they rescinded the "Shelter in Place" order.

That's not surrendering, it's taking on a difficult task. Bostonians, including and especially "Boston Liberals" have the strength and courage to do that, and one important element of that strength and courage is the strength and courage to trust those we ask to protect us.




Speaking of Civil Rights, I'm seeing a lot of coverage today of the decision that's been made that, under what's called the "Public Safety Exception," the FBI won't "Mirandize" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev before questioning him.

(If that's unclear, "Mirandize" means to read to him, as you've seen on American TV police dramas, what is legally known, after the Supreme Court case that governs it, as the Miranda Warning: "You have the right to remain silent. If you give up that right, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to consult with an attorney, and to have him present during question. If you so desire, and cannot afford one, one will be provided for you, free of charge. DO you understand these rights as I have explained them to you?")

I'll start here: It's the wrong decision. America stands for something, and one of them is equality under the law. We shouldn't be treating some criminals differently than others. The putative "advantage" the FBI gets from this is minor. Tsarnaev still has those rights. As an American kid, he's doubtless seen enough cop shows that he knows he has those rights. If he clams up, there's nothing the Feds can do about it, and if he demands a lawyer, they have to get him one, whether they read him his rights or not. So making a decision not to read him his rights, and declaring that they'll fight in court to admit anything he says under such questioning as evidence under the claim that the questioning prior to such reading was necessary for the safety of the general public has very little payoff, and the potential cost -- because a judge will rule whether or not she agrees with that, and could well make any such testimony, and any evidence developed from such testimony, inadmissible -- is really high. It's a dumb decision.

You know what, though? So what? As I said, he has the rights, whether they're read to him or not. And does this case look to you like it's going to depend on statements Tsarnaev makes during interrogation? He's on videotape planting the bomb. A victim looked him in the eye as he planted it. He took part in the murder of a police officer, and a carjacking in which he or his brother told the victim, who can and will testify, "We did the Marathon bombing, and we just killed a cop. Give us your car or we'll kill you, too." He took part in a high-speed chase and a gun battle with police, then another gun battle with them. Same gun in both? I'll bet it was. Will there be GSR (Gunshot Residue) on his clothing and skin? Yes. Similar bombs and bomb-making ingredients and components were found in his car, in the carjacked car, and in his home. You wanna bet against there being fingerprint evidence all over all of this? I certainly don't.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev will be convicted of all the crimes without a word of testimony from his questioning now. And his Fifth Amendment rights are his. If a judge declares everything he tells the feds inadmissible against him, it will still be admissible against anybody his responses lead them to. Any evidence developed against any other parties based on his responses under FBI questioning will stand up in court.

So, what the hell? As long as they don't try to convict him with testimony given during un-Mirandized questioning, and as long as, if he chooses to remain silent, or asks for an attorney, the law is properly followed, I don't see where his rights are violated.




Lastly, in response to Arkansas Republican state representative Nate Bell, who wrote on Twitter yesterday, "I wonder how many Boston liberals spent the night cowering in their homes wishing they had an AR-15 with a hi-capacity magazine," I will point this out again. Bostonians don't cower. Not ever. Not in their homes, not anywhere.

You know where people do cower, though? Not Bostonians -- at least, not enough of them to matter -- but waaaaaay too many Americans?

They don't cower behind their doors, but many cower behind their guns, and the bigger, more over-powered a gun is, the more likely the civilian behind it is to be cowering.

April 15th, 2013

Some facts and some irresponsible speculation about the Boston Marathon Bombing

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Facts:

Today is Patriots Day in Massachusetts, the commemoration of the famous Midnight Ride of Paul Revere. It's HUGELY significant in the Right-Wing Anti-Government Nutbag movement. Timothy McVeigh's truck bomb destroyed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people, 19 of them children under the age of six, on April 19th, 1995 - Patriot's Day.

Today is "Tax Day," April Fifteenth, the deadline for Americans to file their income tax returns. This is also hugely significant to the Right-Wing Anti-Government Nutbag movement, as, to them, taxation=tyranny.

Boston is the cradle of the American Revolution. This is where Crispus Attucks fell, the first American to die in the American Revolution. It's the home of John Adams, of Nathan Hale, of Paul Revere.

Boston was, of course, the site of the very famous Boston Tea Party, an event considered iconic by the Right-Wing Anti-Government Nutbag movement.

Boston is also, of course a famously liberal city, capital of a famously liberal state, nearly universally loathed by the Right-Wing Anti-Government Nutbag movement.

Irresponsible speculation:

We're going to find that this was an act of domestic terrorism, the Right-Wing Anti-Government Nutbag movement.

And when you see some scraggly guy from some "Militia" brought in in cuffs, remember this: What he believes in differs in only one significant way from Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Ted Cruz, and the rest of the Teabaggers who have infested American politics: Willingness to outright murder innocents to make their political points. Everything they believe in, everything they fight for, would make Timothy McVeigh smile.

April 2nd, 2013

Bwahahahahahahah!!!!!

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
This makes me laugh so hard!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU3HHydacBg


The whole trailer is actually hilarious, and you can see it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i24fo2W5EaE

April 1st, 2013

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhEI_jDRZw8


Adam Rayner feels perfectly "Saintly," and although Leslie Charteris' stories and novels didn't involve an over-arching plotline about Simon Templar's family -- I can hear some network suit saying, "This makes it personal!" -- it does no harm to Simon's character.

And, special super-duper extra exciting! The two older gentlemen talking at the end? The mysterious bearded man who seems to be the "Big Bad" condescendingly asking the other "Do you still believe in Simon Templar?" and the other replying, "The world needs the Saint!"

The apparent villain is actor and novelist Ian Ogilvy who was, himself, marvelous as Simon Templar in the 1970s series "The Return of the Saint," and the fellow he's talking to is, of course, Roger Moore!

This, my friends, is going to be awesome. And, by the way, my friends who love White Collar will definitely want to check this out. Neal Caffrey is absolutely the spiritual descendant of Simon Templar.

March 11th, 2013

Thoughts on "Skyfall"

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Y'know what's weird about Skyfall? It is, like Dame Judy Dench's Bond premiere, Goldeneye, a movie about Bond's history, and how obsolete he supposedly is. (Before it proves that he isn't obsolete at all.) It bathes in nostalgia for classic Bond, with the proud return of the famous Astin-Martin DB5, and a closing scene that "brings us full circle" to the Bond/M/Moneypenny Status Quo from Doctor No...

But it stars a Bond who is explicitly on only his third mission as a Double-Oh. It's not that it's Craig's first movie: Of all the problems that "Live and Let Die" had, accepting Moore as having been Double-Oh Seven for a long time wasn't one of them, and even George Lazenby had a scene fondly saying farewell to props from Bond movies he didn't appear in.

But we saw Craig "earn his bones" and become a Double-Oh in Casino Royale: He was a whole new Bond at a whole new beginning. Quantum of Solace was such a direct sequel that it began within about fifteen minutes of the closing shot of Casino Royale, and now Skyfall comes along. A Bond with just two known missions behind him is the wrong vehicle to wax nostalgic over fifty years of movies. Daniel Craig is not just a different face and form for the same Bond who followed Goldfinger across Europe in that DB5, He's a whole new guy, inhabiting a whole new universe, in which Blofeld and Rosa Klebb, Auric Goldfinger and Emilio Largo never existed.

It makes the whole thing feel weirdly wrong.

March 8th, 2013

"...Boy, do I itch all over!"

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
"When you lie down with dogs," the old saying goes -- and I'm stealing this opening from a commentator on '60 Minutes' in the early 1980s -- "you get up with fleas," and, Boy, do I itch all over!

Rand Paul is the worst sort of political idiot stooge. He's an ideological moron. But, as they -- including Chris Matthews, who said this last night in this context -- also say, "A stopped clock is right twice a day."

Rand Paul isn't "right" with anything close to that frequency.

But all the liberals and especially liberal journalists/commentators like Matthews and his MSNBC evening cohort Ed Schultz and others, should really STFU and stop embarrassing themselves about Rand Paul's filibuster.

Paul's filibuster went to a lot of silly places, and, frankly, it was, as is so much of his political career, a triumph of theory of practice, of ideas over reality. He stated as much, in so many words, himself.

But this is what the filibuster is for. I don't particularly disagree with the point Paul was making (I'll get back to this later) and, likewise, I think Senator Lindsey Graham made an important point about the partisan nature of the ginned-up outrage so many Republicans are expressing toward the drone program, but that's neither here nor there. When we talk about filibuster reform, there's a reason I don't want to see it done away with entirely, and this is why.

The filibuster exists so that a senator who has a deep and important concern about an important matter of public policy can bring the chamber to a pause, a moment -- or a few hours -- of cessura, to give attention to that matter. It's a Good Thing.

I'm especially troubled by the willful ignorance being exercised by MSNBC's Chris Matthews, a very good journalist who would be a great one if he would realize that he'll have more value if the people he's interviewing get to actually say what they're trying to say, in his criticisms of Paul's remarks.

Rand Paul said, and he's absolutely right, that Barack Obama is not an evil despot and that there is no reason to fear that he will kill an American sitting outside Panera Bread for breakfast in Chillicothe, OH, for political criticism of his administration. As Paul put it, "Nobody is Hitler," and he added that he finds the comparison of various political opponents to Der Fuhrer wrongheaded and distasteful. But what Paul points out is that it's not good enough to simply say, "I trust President Obama," because it's always possible that the tools we trust him with will end up in the hands of a duly elected government that is genuinely evil. Americans in 2016 or 2020 will not be inherently more moral than Germans in 1934.

So if you're going to rail at Rand Paul for comparing Obama to Hitler, STFU, because he didn't. If you're going to rail at him for comparing ANYBODY to Hitler, STFU, because he didn't.

And, Chris Matthews, don't pretend it's incomprehensible why he mentioned Hitler if he wasn't trying to compare anyone currently involved to Hitler, because you're lying. I know you're lying, because you've shown a fine grasp of the way Democrats and Republicans both seem loath to take away oft-abuse powers like the silent filibuster, because both sides are eager to have the ability to abuse them when THEY are in power.

Rand Paul spent thirteen hours talking to the nation about the importance of remembering that the powers you give a President you love and trust and respect will also belong to a president you loathe and fear and are ashamed of, and giving a good man the power and authority to kill anyone, anywhere, because you trust him not to abuse that authority is dangerous, because that office and authority will not always belong to that good man. That's a point worth making.

Now, the fact is, the whole matter of the drone program and its attendant issue of the targeted killing of individuals, including Americans, is not the failure of transparency its critics pretend it is. It's a TRIUMPH of transparency, because we know it exists as a program. I assure you, there has never been an administration in this nation's history that has not had some agents of some sort who would go out and kill threats to the nation without allowing recourse to due process. It's ugly, but true. Every country has and has had its illicit assassins. Matt Helm and James Bond represent something real, and we've been happier not knowing about them.

In the "West Wing" episode "Isaac and Ishmael," Aaron Sorkin gives Alison Janney, as C.J. Cregg, the following speech:

"Look, I take civil liberties as seriously as anybody, okay? I've been to the dinners and we haven't even talked about free speech yet and somebody getting lynched by the patriotism police for voicing a minority opinion. That said, Tobus, we're going to have to do some stuff. We're going to have to tap some phones and we're going to have to partner with some people who are the lesser of evils. I'm sorry but terrorists don't have armies and navies. They don't have capitals. Some of these guys we're going to have to walk up to them and shoot them. Yeah, we can root terrorist nests but some of these guys aren't going to be taken by the 105th armored tank division. Some of these guys are going to be taken by a busboy with a silencer. So it's time to give the intelligence agencies the money and the manpower they need. We don't hear about their successes. Guess what? The Soviets never crossed the Elbe. The North Koreans stayed behind the 38th parallel. During the Millennium? Not one incident. Do you think that's because the terrorists decided that'd be a good day to take off? Not much action that day? End of song."

Welcome to the drone program. That's why Rand Paul is ultimately wrong. It's not that we will always have presidents who are trustworthy, and will never abuse the technology and authority and power. It's that all governments already have and exercise that power as they see fit, and, even though we'd rather not think about it, we're happier and better off because they do.

But Rand Paul's filibuster was a lawmaker bringing us to a halt for a little while to tell us that we need to pay attention to an important issue of law and morality. It was a Good Thing, and I thank him for it. This is what the filibuster is for, and it's still something we need.

Get off his back.

March 1st, 2013

The Relentless March of Science!

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pii4G8FkCA4


February 28th, 2013

Just Say Meow

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3scQ0wq5zLE


January 29th, 2013

A short musical interlude.

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Sung to the tune of "Daddy Wasn't There" by Ming Tea Featuring Austin Powers

Samwise
He's afraid of cats

Samwise
He's afraid of cats
Women wearing hats
Even girls in flats

He's afraid of cats

Samwise
He's afraid of cats
Perhaps he lost some spats
(they don't even act like brats)

But he's afraid of cats

When they're on the bed
Dunno what he read
You can see his dread
No matter what you said
They just get in his head
Then he can't be led
And he won't get in bed......

He's afraid of cats

When they're on the bed
Dunno what he read
You can see his dread
No matter what you said
They just get in his head
Then he can't be led
And he won't get in bed......

He's afraid of cats
He just can't face the prats
They scare him more than bats
He's afraid of cats

(Spoken) He's afraid of cats! Peace!





If you're unfamiliar with the source:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NimsvSNzFY8

Or, if you don't feel you've suffered enough:





http://leviathanstudios.com/He's%20Afraid%20Of%20Cats%20-%20Mixed.mp3

January 28th, 2013

Samwise

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

Samwise

After our heartbreaking loss of Mandy, the Bear-Shaped Dog, there was a dark cloud over the Sheen household. We have five cats, and love them, but I've always been a Dog person, and Mandy taught Cindy to crave canine company as well. It was clear we'd need to adopt another dog. We set about scanning online dog adoption listings. There were some false starts: There was Christy, a ten-year-old Chow Chow, whose adoption was on-track until the adopting agency insisted on a condition we'd ruled out in our very first communication. Then there was Arlo, a very sweet and loveable boy who was far too rambunctious for the safety of our cats. He spent a few days with us, and had to return to the shelter he'd come from, which we found gut-wrenching and heartbreaking, as well.

More recently, I read the story of a pair of Lhasa Apso/Shih-Tzu mixes who had excaped from a situation of dreadful neglect, only to be refugees from Hurricane Sandy, a terribly sad story we hoped to give a happy ending, but couldn't, as they turned out to be relentless cat-chasers. The agency that had them was one that specialized in American Eskimo Dogs. I was drawn to that breed, known colloquoially as "Eskies," because they are built and furred similarly to Chow Chows, and so would recall my beloved Bear-Shaped Dog. There were a couple of Eskies who had been in a neglectful environment, in whom we were also interested, but the lady in charge of the rescue agency had a different idea. Having read my tale of life with Mandy (included to give a sense of the sort of relationship we would want with any dog we adopted) Denise of Eskies Online had a very strong feeling that a dog she'd re-rescued so recently that he wasn't even listed on their website, would be a good fit for us, so she sent us two pictures of a dog thought to be a Golden Retriever/Collie cross, named "Gito:"



He certainly looked like a sweet fellow, but Cindy and I were sort of fixated on an Eskie named Simon, and there were some factors about Denise's recommendation that concerned me. He had been adopted out previously to a married couple, and that adoption hadn't worked out, because Gito had taken against the wife, who had a sort of nervous energy about her, which is a description I would, when stressed, apply to Cindy. That tail hanging down behind Gito also concerned me. It didn't look to me, after 8 years with Mandy, like a happy tail; it looked to me like the tail of a sad, defeated dog. Lastly, and most trivially, neither Cindy nor I liked the name "Gito." Still, it didn't seem fair to me to reject him out of hand, and he was clearly a good-looking dog, so we were open to meeting him as well as Simon.

Another wrinkle arose. Denise's usual method of adoptions is to bring the dogs to the home of the candidates. But we Sheens are fierce about our privacy, so that wouldn't work for us. We offered to go to Denise, but she had similar concerns. There was discussion back and forth, trying to come up with a comfortable alternative, until — and I'm inordinately proud of this — I hit upon the ideas of meeting up at a PetCo or PetSmart store, where patrons are encouraged to bring in their dogs, and there are usually benches for owners to wait while dogs are groomed or seen by veterinarians. When I suggested this to Denise, by Text Message, she looked up from the restaurant table where she was having lunch in her area, and across the street to where a PetSmart stood, and the plan was made on the spot.

The following Saturday, January 26th, 2013, we drove the two hours from our home just south of the New Hampshire border to the PetSmart in Johnston, Rhode Island. When we were within a couple of miles of the store, my phone rang, and it was Denise telling me she was going into the store with Gito. Honestly, I was disappointed. We were really thinking about Simon. But, hey, there's nothing wrong with meeting any dog, and it was hardly his fault he had a name we really hated! So we arrived, parked, and went inside. We recognized Gito immediately, and went over to introduce ourselves to Denise and her husband, and, of course, to Gito.

He was a very calm, sweet-natured dog, placidly greeting us and accepting petting from us in a way that reminded me a lot of Mandy. He was also extraordinarily soft and fluffy, with such amazing, warm, soft, lovely fur, we could hardly keep our hands off him. His tail was still hanging down behind him, but, without my having mentioned it, Denise said that his tail was one of her favorite things about him, and that, when he was happy, he carried it curled over his back. I was thrilled to hear that! I also took note that, while we were talking, a lady approached the nearby veterinarian's counter with two open cat-carriers with cats inside. That would have been enough to pre-occupy Arlo, but Gito paid the cats no mind, any more than he did passing dogs. Even though we saw no sign of the curled-above-the-back tail, and the ears still hung slack, he was so sweet, and so calm, that he totally stole our heart. After maybe twenty minutes sitting on a bench, petting Gito, I leaned over to Cindy and asked, "Do you want to meet Simon the Eskie?" She shook her head firmly. "Certainly not." So we told Denise and her Husband that we had decided. We would adopt Gito. We brought him outside, signed papers, paid an adoption fee, shook hands all around, and climbed into our car, me driving and Cindy in the back with Gito.

As we drove North, we talked to Gito, who was very relaxed and affectionate and placid, and talked to one another about him. Cindy thought the Golden Retriever/Collie theory was wrong. Those brown dots on his snout said "Spaniel" to her. I asked her how she was feeling about the name "Gito." She still didn't like it, and frankly, neither did I. I asked her if she had any ideas, and she brought up a series of commonplace male names, none of which grabbed us, and then she chuckled and suggested "Samuel the Spaniel?"

That joke didn't tickle me as a serious name, but there was something we both liked about "Sam" or "Sammy." We wandered about as we drove, considering names, and I found myself remembering that our grey-and-white cat, known by the nickname "The Little Man," was really named "Gandalf," and it struck me immediately. "Samwise?" I suggested. Cindy readily agreed, so we started calling him that. By the time we stopped at the Donelan's supermarket in our home town of Pepperell, Massachusetts, he was already starting to identify with that name, and with us as his people:

When we walked in the door on Saturday afternoon, he completely ignored our cats. By Saturday night, I took this picture:


That, my friends, is a happy tail!

As I write this, it's almost bedtime on the night of Monday, January 28th, 2013, after two and a half days with us, he's completely bonded with us, and he knows his name quite well. He's a very happy dog, and Cindy and I are sort of stunned that we've been lucky enough to bring him home. Research online has led us to conclude that the "Collie/Golden Retriever" theory is incorect. There could be Collie, and there could be Golden Retriever, but we're quite sure that he's partly Brittany Spaniel, and that that breed is so dominant that he may as well be a purebred -- if, indeed, he isn't! He's already a completely essential part of our lives. He's become more active and playful, but without losing his gentleness. He's extremely deferential to our cats, who are getting used to him, he sits with an audible thump in front of the door when approached with a leash -- although he also gets so excited he jumps up, and sometimes gets so excited when we go out that he races at high speed to the limit of the leash and back, like a cat with the crazies, grunting with pleasure at the fun he's having. He's really enjoyed today's snow.

So here, for your enjoyment, more of our wonderful new family member, Samwise:





December 26th, 2012

Black Armbands being worn at Shado Control, and the flags fly at half-staff on Tracy Island

Add to Memories Tell a Friend



www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-20845407


Gerry Anderson, Thunderbirds creator, dies

Gerry Anderson, the creator of hit TV shows including Thunderbirds, Stingray and Joe 90, has died at the age of 83.

He also created Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons and his puppet superheroes fired the imaginations of millions of young viewers in the 1960s and '70s.

Thunderbirds, a science-fiction fantasy about a daring rescue squad, ran from 1965 and was his most famous show.

Anderson had suffered from Alzheimer's since 2010 and the disease had worsened in recent months, his son Jamie said.

Jamie Anderson announced the news on his website, saying his father died peacefully in his sleep at noon on Wednesday.

"Gerry was diagnosed with mixed dementia two years ago and his condition worsened quite dramatically over the past six months," he wrote.

Gerry Anderson talked about the onset of the disease in June 2012.

Speaking on BBC Berkshire he said: "I don't think I realised at all. It was my wife Mary who began to notice that I would do something quite daft like putting the kettle in the sink and waiting for it to boil."

His other creations included UFO, Space: 1999, Supercar and Fireball XL5.

Actor Brian Blessed, who worked with Anderson on shows including The Day After Tomorrow and Space 1999, told BBC News: "I think a light has gone out in the universe.

"He had a great sense of humour. He wasn't childish but child-like and he had a tremendous love of the universe and astronomy and scientists.

"He got their latest theories, which he would expand on. He was always galvanised and full of energy."

'Great creation'

Celebrities paying tribute on Twitter included comedian Eddie Izzard, who wrote: "What great creation Thunderbirds was, as it fuelled the imagination of a generation."

TV presenter Jonathan Ross wrote: "For men of my age, his work made childhood an incredible place to be."

Anderson, who lived in Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, began his career studying fibrous plastering, but had to give it up when it gave him dermatitis.

After a spell in photographic portrait work, a job in Gainsborough films and time spent in air traffic control, he set up AP Films with some friends.

Commissions were few, however, so he responded eagerly to the opportunity to make a puppet series called The Adventures of Twizzle in 1956. It was nine years before Thunderbirds came into being on ITV.

The action was filmed on Slough Trading Estate in Berkshire.

The story revolved around International Rescue, a futuristic emergency service manned by the Tracy family, often assisted by Lady Penelope - voiced by Mrs Anderson - and her butler, Parker.

It included the catchphrases "Thunderbirds are go!" and "FAB".

The show marked the career apex for Gerry and his wife Sylvia, who had honed their "supermarionation" technique on Fireball XL5 and Stingray.

Nick Williams, chairman of Fanderson, the Gerry Anderson appreciation society, described him as "a quiet, unassuming but determined man".

"His desire to make the best films he could drove him and his talented teams to innovate, take risks, and do everything necessary to produce quite inspirational works," he said.

"Gerry's legacy is that he inspired so many people and continues to bring so much joy to so many millions of people around the world."

 

December 25th, 2012

Fandom, this is what you've done to me...

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
 Clarence Williams III, Peggy Lipton & Michael Cole in "The Mod Squad."
 

Is it wrong that, whenever I watch reruns of "The Mod Squad" on my local "METV" affiliate, all I can think is, OT3!!!!!!!!!!! ?

December 24th, 2012

It's that time again.....

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
 <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZSuPa2cpKK4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

December 21st, 2012

Stolen from The Smoking Gun: U.S. Olympian's Secret Life As Las Vegas Escort

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

I find this story really fascinating. There are a lot of interesting parallels I see between the "community" of escorts and clients, and the communities of the fandoms we're all involved in.


Click to read the stolen story )


Leviathan here again:

For this to make sense, I have to mention something else, another source of information I'm remembering.

There used to be a website called "CLReviews.com," on which clients  left reviews of their experiences with prostitutes. It was subdivided into regions -- Las Vegas, New England, New York, etc, etc -- and really existed as a consumer resource for johns, extolling the virtues of this call-girl, warning about problems with that one, etc. Sometimes girls would post on the board as well, either defending against bad reviews (sometimes with reason, others not so much) and it all sounded very familiar to me at the time.

There were very much community norms. Hookers were known as "Providers," and generally referred to with the same sort of respect you might show for a carpenter or a plumber or any other skilled craftsperson. Johns were "Hobbyists." A hobbyist who provided personal details about a provider -- especially a provider who wished to operate with a low profile ("UTR" for "Under the Radar") -- would be shamed by the other hobbyists on the site. They had their own terminology and slang. When a new provider came on the scene, a hobbyist asking about her would be encouraged to "TOFTT" ("Take One For The Team," meaning go ahead and pay for a session with her, and then review her on the board,) And reviews would be full of terms like "GFE" ("Girlfriend Experience," a style of session that's friendlier and more personal than just sex,) "DFK," ("Deep French Kissing,") "BB" ("Bareback," usually as a prefix on a longer abbreviation, like BBCG for "Bareback Cowgirl," meaning without requiring condoms ["Cowgirl" being a specific position you can figure out,]) and, my personal favorite, "DATY," which stands for "Dining At The Y," meaning a provider allows cunnilingus.

I found the site an entertaining read. I've never been a hobbyist -- too much wife, not enough money -- but I'm not against anything adults do with competent consent, and the reviews ranged from gross-out comedy to "Penthouse Forum" stuff, and knowing that I was reading about real women in my area who could be hired (even though I wouldn't do so) to have sex gave reading it an extra charge.

The reason I'm going into all this is that time spent on that site gave a real feeling for what that world was like to the people involved, and it was very much the same sort of tribal sense of community that we have in the  various fandoms we're all involved in here.

We have our rules, our norms. Where Favor Hamilton says, “He totally broke all the rules by outing me," but "I don’t want to be like him. Because he is scum. And I will not become scum to make myself feel good,” Favor Hamilton said. “I will not do it. I would suffer rather than go that route of being vindictive,” and, when the reporter is baffled by that attitude, replies, “I can’t expect you to understand, you aren’t in that world,” couldn't that be right out of any of our fannish communities?

So I find the whole story really fascinating, and I'd love to see it examined more thoroughly with an eye toward the way these tribal subcultures form, and how those can collide with the norms of outside society.



December 20th, 2012

Emma Watson's entire part from the trailer for "This Is The End"

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

December 14th, 2012

AMERICANS ARE FUCKING CRAZY.

Add to Memories Tell a Friend

Look, "Gentle" and "Polite" have obviously not worked. It's time to just come out and say it:

AMERICANS ARE FUCKING CRAZY.

WE ARE FULL-GOOSE-BOZO, ROUND THE FUCKING BEND, OUT OF OUR FUCKING MINDS.

The rest of the world knows it. Watch any episode of "Doctor Who" that involves both Americans and firearms. Americans and Guns aren't so much Thelma and Louise, but the two women in the french movie "Basé Moi," who travel around killing, maiming, crippling and disfiguring before they end up destroying themselves.

We're so fucking painless stupid that we think any regulation of any kind violates an amendment that begins with the words "A well-regulated."

We're full past the brim of assholes who fantasies themselves movie heroes, Dirty Harry, and are perfectly happy to see dozens of harmless innocents at a time -- politically active Arizonans, Batman fans in Colorado, now schoolchildren in Connecticut -- than have any risk of losing their "Dirty Harry" prop, their surrogate penis, their masturbatory "no-poke" dildo: Their gun.

Statistics show that the number of people who have protected themselves or their families with guns are vanishing small -- considerably smaller, in fact, than the number who have their own guns taken away, to be killed with them. Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidians tell you all there is to know about rugged American patriots defending their liberty from a tyrannical government. Even if George Washington _had_ said "Guns are our liberty teeth" -- which, to the eternal gratitude of those of us who like to think him capable of eloquent, elegant writing, he never, ever did -- trying to bite back with them has not historically worked out well for the biter.

But America has made its priorities clear. Better endless, infinite innocents die, shoppers and moviegoers and first, second, third and fourth graders, than anyone who wants to pretend he's a Tarantino character have to do so with a plastic toy.

We are out of our fucking minds.

Powered by JournalFen