Jon "Bad Wasabi" Wood's Journal

Time:

7:55 pm.

In a debate about sexism and objectification by gender, a guy said that a man being promised he will shortly become a prisoner's "bitch" is not misandrist at all, but actually solely misogynist, because it uses a comparison to a woman as a pejorative.

I clarified the term.

He insisted the actual rape part was irrelevant next to being compared to a woman.

I mad.

Comments: Add Your Own.

Subject:	Conspiracy Theorist Bingo
Time:	12:15 am.

B	I	N	G	O
using the parts of the "lying" official sources that support their argument	refusal to consider how many people would've been involved in the conspiracy	refusal to admit they're wrong or don't know something	declaring something unknowable, yet claiming to know what it is	"Xs demand an investigation!"
favoring info which "supports" them over much more info that refutes them	ignoring requests for proof entirely	quote-mining	avoidance of describing an overall theory	"no one can tell me that..."
accusing opposition of logical fallacies they themselves have been demonstrating	describing something as "simple", yet refusing to demonstrate it themselves	FREE	deriding opposition in lieu of evidence, sources, or logic	valuing doubts over facts
presenting "evidence" without explaining what it means	"Clearly/Obviously..."	deriding anyone who disagrees with them to open their post	avoiding subjects they're not "experts" on	"look it up yourself" when asked for evidence or sources
focusing on motive, means, or opportunity, and ignoring the other two	ignoring context	describing something as "a credible X" when they haven't been challenged	redirecting/changing subject when asked for proof	self-contradictory arguments

I ran out of space.

Refusal to look at both sides' claims and evidence.

Refusal to say which of their claims is most important.

Attempting to shift the burden of proof.

Declaring anyone who opposes them to be either a "sheep" or a "shill".

Using the term "open-minded" to refer to themselves and "close-minded" to refer to the opposition.

Declaring they want to know the "truth", despite the fact that they already act like they know what it is.

Comments: Add Your Own.

Subject:	Wankitywank bingo
Time:	6:50 pm.

The following applies to any instance a wanker replying/responding to a post anywhere on the Internet where they're mocked, whether in the comments or on their own site. It also applies to those responding in agreement with the original wanker.

B	I	N	G	O
"have no right"	"respect"	"these people are talking about you"	"they can dish it out, but they can't take it"	"hateful"
"just jealous"	"tries hard"	"nobody's perfect"	"insecure"	"behind your back"
"judgemental"	"just their opinion"	FREE	"just stupid"	"nothing better to do"
"you/they can't criticise unless you/they can"	"can't appreciate"	"high school"	"thanks for the hits!"	"small-minded"
"not worth my attention/time"	"don't care"	"can't handle reality/ job/ a relationship"	"just jaded/ biased/ bitter/ cynical"	"immature"

Comments: Read 19 or Add Your Own.

Subject:	Ginmar bingo!
Time:	1:05 pm.

B	I	N	G	O
"equalists are cowards"	"anon commenters are cowards"	"I've explained this already"	"they can dish it out, but they can't take it"	"Faux news"
"men and women are not equal"	"patriarchy"	"men fear retribution"	"there's no such things as equalists"	"I WENT TO IRAQ!"
"vast feminist conspiracy" (sarcasm)	I can't listen to you because _____	FREE	MASS GRAVE	"Xtian"
"hypocrisy"	ALL CAPS	"my father was Jewish"	avoiding the question entirely	"victim"/ "victimization"/ "victimized"
"men are insecure"	"...in fear of men"	"submission"/ "submissive"	"male privilege"	OPRESSION

Any of the above also apply if any of her sycophants says it.

Comments: Read 8 or Add Your Own.

Subject:	The Eleven Wank Commandments
Time:	4:16 pm.

Thou shalt misunderstand the statements of others completely.
Should thine opponent use Wikipedia, thou shalt dismiss it, claiming that anyone can edit it. Should one use Wikipedia, thou shalt use it as thine only support, regardless of how many relevant online resources one can use.
Thou shalt accuse one's opponent of "misunderstanding" thine argument(s), especially when said argument(s) has been soundly defeated.
Thou shalt post on thine blog or Livejournal about the wank. Should the journal be friends-locked, the post shalt be unlocked.
Should there be a post on *_wank, or any other snark community, thou shalt show up and defend thyself. After thine are pwned, thou shalt retreat to thine own journal and link to the *_wank post, while describing its commenters as losers, people with nothing better to do, or both.
Thou shalt use strange, bizarro-definitions of words and phrases. If thou wishes, thou shalt contradict thyself. Thou shalt also refer to an opponent's refutation of thine point as "proving my point".
Wheresoever thine grammar is criticized, thou shalt sieze upon any error in thine critic's grammar, and thereby dismiss the critique. The error need not be real.
Thou shalt never admit defeat, and continue wanking until the post is deleted or replies are frozen. Thou may then continue the wank at thine leisure at the post in thine journal.
Should a post of thine cause wank, thou shalt 'clarify' thine intent with edits to the original post. And the number thereof be of inverse proportion to the validity of one's original post.
Wheresoever one art cornered, one shalt claim thine opponent is judging thee, the arguement, or they that are under discussion.
If thou shalt leave the wank, though shalt return at a later date to defend thy argument.

Thus spake God to

mcity.
Contibutions accepted.
EDIT 27Jan06: Spelling corrected.
EDIT Mar 26th 06: Added 11th. Amended 10th and fourth.

Comments: Read 7 or Add Your Own.